Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJemimah Edwards Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 Chemical Bonds are lines Surface is Electrical Potential Red is positive Blue is negative Chemist’s Vie w Ion Channels Proteins with a Hole All Atoms View Figure by Raimund Dutzler ~30 Å
2
2 Channels form a class of Biological Systems that can be analyzed with Physics as Usual Physics-Mathematics-Engineering are the proper language for Ion Channels in my opinion ION CHANNELS: Proteins with a Hole
3
3 Physics as Usual along with Biology as Usual Ion Channels can be analyzed with
4
4 Biology is first of all a Descriptive Science Biology Involves Many Objects. The Devices and Machines of Biology must be Named and Described Then they can be understood by Physics as Usual
5
5 “Why think?. Exhaustively experiment. Then, think” Claude Bernard Cited in The Great Influenza, John M. Barry, Viking Penguin Group 2004 Biology as Usual Biology is first of all a Descriptive Science Then, Physics as Usual
6
6 Channels control flow in and out of cells ION CHANNELS as Biological Objects ~5 µm
7
7 ~30 Å Ion Channels are the Main Molecular Controllers “Valves” of Biological Function
8
8 Channels control flow of Charged Spheres Channels have Simple Invariant Structure on the biological time scale. Why can’t we predict the movement of Charged Spheres through a Hole? ION CHANNELS as Physical Devices
9
9 Physical Characteristics of Ion Channels Natural Nanodevices Ion channels have VERY Large Charge Densities critical to I-V characteristics and selectivity (and gating?) Ion channels have Selectivity. K channel selects K + over Na + by ~10 4. Ion channels are Device Elements that self-assemble into perfectly reproducible arrays. Ion channels form Templates for design of bio-devices and biosensors. Ion channels allow Atomic Scale Mutations that modify conductance, selectivity, and function. Ion channels Gate/Switch in response to pH, voltage, chemical species and mechanical force from conducting to nonconducting state. ~30Å Figure by Raimund Dutzler
10
10 Channels Control Macroscopic Flow with Atomic Resolution ION CHANNELS as Technological Objects
11
11 Ion Channels are Important Enough to be Worth the Effort
12
12 Goal: Predict Function From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws
13
13 Goal, in language of engineers, Develop Device Equation! Goal in language of Physiology: Predict Function, from Structure, given Fundamental Physical Laws
14
14 Current in One Channel Molecule is a Random Telegraph Signal
15
Voltage Step Applied Here (+ 80 mV; 1M KCl) Gating: Opening of Porin Trimer John Tang Rush Medical Center
16
16 Single Channel Currents have little variance John Tang Rush Medical Center
17
17 Lipid Bilayer Setup Recordings from a Single Molecule Conflict of Interest
18
18 Patch clamp and Bilayer apparatus clamp ion concentrations in the baths and the voltage across membranes. Patch Clamp Setup Recordings from One Molecule
19
19 Voltage in baths Concentration in baths Fixed Charge on channel protein Current depends on John Tang Rush Medical Center OmpF KCl 1M 1M || G119D KCl 1M 1M || ompF KCl 0.05 M 0.05M || G119D KCl 0.05 M 0.05M || Bilayer Setup
20
20 Current depends on type of ion Selectivity John Tang Rush Medical Center OmpF KCl 1M 1M || OmpF CaCl 2 1M 1M || Bilayer Setup
21
21 Goal: Predict Function From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws
22
22 Structures… Location of charges are known with atomic precision (~0.1 Å) in favorable cases.
23
23 Charge Mutation in Porin Ompf Figure by Raimund Dutzler Structure determined by x-ray crystallography in Tilman Schirmer’s lab G119D
24
24 Goal: Predict Function From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws
25
25 But … What are the Fundamental Physical ‘Laws’?
26
26 Verbal Models Are Popular with Biologists but Inadequate
27
27 James Clerk Maxwell “I carefully abstain from asking molecules where they start… I only count them…., avoiding all personal enquiries which would only get me into trouble.” Royal Society of London, 1879, Archives no. 188 In Maxwell on Heat and Statistical Mechanics, Garber, Brush and Everitt, 1995
28
28 I fear Biologists use Verbal Models where Maxwell abstained
29
29 Verbal Models are Vague and Difficult to Test
30
30 Verbal Models lead to Interminable Argument and Interminable Investigation
31
31 thus, to Interminable Funding
32
32 and so Verbal Models Are Popular
33
33 Can Molecular Simulations serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? Only if they count correctly !
34
34 It is very difficult for Molecular Dynamics to count well enough to reproduce Conservation Laws (e.g., of energy) Concentration (i.e., number density) or activity Energy of Electric Field Ohm’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Fick’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Fluctuations in number density (e.g., entropy)
35
35 Can Molecular Simulations Serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? Simulations are not Mathematics! (e.g., results depend on numerical procedures and round-off error) Simulations are Reliable Science when they are Calibrated
36
36 Simulations are not Mathematics! Simulations are Reliable Science when they are Calibrated The computer should not be used in the ‘stand-alone’ mode quotation from J.D. Skufca, Analysis Still Matters, SIAM Review 46: 737 (2004) because results often depend on numerical procedures and round-off error
37
37 Can Molecular Simulations serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? Only if Calibrated!
38
38 Can Molecular Simulations serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? What should be calibrated? I believe Thermodynamics of ions must be calibrated, i.e., activity = free energy per mole, which means the Pair Correlation Function according to classical Stat Mech
39
39 Calibrated Molecular Dynamics may be possible MD without Periodic Boundary Conditions ─ HNC HyperNetted Chain Pair Correlation Function in Bulk Solution Saraniti Lab, IIT: Aboud, Marreiro, Saraniti & Eisenberg
40
40 Calibrated Molecular Dynamics may be possible MD without Periodic Boundary Conditions BioMOCA ─ E quilibrium M onte C arlo (ala physical chemistry) Pair Correlation Function in Bulk Solution van der Straaten, Kathawala, Trellakis, Eisenberg & Ravaioli
41
41 Calibrated MD may be possible, even in a Gramicidin channel Molecular Dynamics without Periodic Boundary Conditions BioMOCA van der Straaten, Kathawala, Trellakis, Eisenberg & Ravaioli Simulations 235ns to 300ns, totaling 4.3 μs. Mean I = 3.85 pA, 24 Na + crossings per 1 μs 16 Na + single channel currents
42
42 Essence of Engineering is knowing What Variables to Ignore! WC Randels quoted in Warner IEEE Trans CT 48:2457 (2001) Until Mathematics of Simulations is available we take an Engineering Approach
43
43 What variables should we ignore when we make low resolution models? How can we tell when a model is helpful? Use the scientific method Guess and Check! Intelligent Guesses are MUCH more efficient Sequence of unintelligent guesses may not converge! (e.g., Rate/State theory of channels/proteins)
44
44 Guess Cleverly! Without qualitative understanding, quantitative models can be only vague statements of thermodynamics. Qualitative Simulations have an important role in Computational Biology
45
45 Goal in language of Physiology: Predict Function, from Structure, given Fundamental Physical Laws Goal, in language of engineers, Develop Device Equation!
46
46 Use Theory of Inverse Problems (Reverse Engineering) optimizes “Guess and Check” 1) Measure only what can be measured (e.g., not two resistors in parallel). 2) Measure what determines important parameters 3) Use efficient estimators. 4) Use estimators with known bias 5) no matter what the theory, Guess Cleverly!
47
47 Use the scientific method Guess and Check! When theory works, need few checks Computations (almost) equal experiments Structural Engineering Circuit Design Airplane Design Computer Design Can be done (almost) by theory,
48
48 Channels are only Holes Why can’t we have a fully successful theory? Must know physical basis to make a good theory Physical Basis of Gating is not known Is the physical basis of permeation known?
49
49 Proteins Bristle with Charge Cohn (1920’s) & Edsall (1940’s) Ion Channels are no exception We start with Electrostatics because of biology
50
50 −0.55O 0.35HH_22 0.60C 0.50C_z 0.35HH_21 −0.45NH_2 0.35HH_12 −0.45NH_1 0.35HH_11 0.32 Average Magnitude 0.30H_e −0.40N_e 0.10C_d 0.00C_g 0.00C_b 0.10C_a 0.25H −0.40N Charge (units / e) Atom in Arginine Charge according to CHARMM
51
51 Many atoms in a protein have Permanent Charge ~1e Permanent charge is the (partial) charge on the atom when the local electric field is zero. Active Sites in Proteins have Many Charges in a Small Place
52
52 Active Sites of Proteins are Very Charged e.g. 7 charges ~ 20 M net charge Selectivity Filters and Gates of Ion Channels are Active Sites 1 nM = 1.2×10 22 cm -3
53
53 in a Sphere of diameter 14 Å Small Charge in Small Places Large Potentials * Start with electrostatics because * Current varies 2.7 × for 25 mV because thermal energy = 25 meV 1 charge gives V at psec times; dielectric constant = 2 mV at µsec times; dielectric constant = 80
54
54 We start without quantum chemistry* (only at first) * i.e., orbital delocalization
55
55 Although we start with electrostatics We will soon add Physical Models of Chemical Effects
56
56 It is appropriate to be skeptical of analysis in which the only chemistry is physical But give me a chance, ask Or email beisenbe@rush.edu for the papers
57
57 Very Different from Traditional Structural Biology which, more or less, ignores Electrostatics
58
58 Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) Note: physicists rarely ignore the electric field, even to begin with. Lowest resolution theory that includes Electrostatics and Flux is (probably) PNP, Gouy-Chapman, (nonlinear) Poisson-Boltzmann, Debye-Hückel, are fraternal twins or siblings with similar resolution
59
59 ION CHANNEL MODELS Poisson’s Equation Drift-diffusion & Continuity Equation Stay Tuned … Derivation on the way: Schuss, Singer, Nadler et al Chemical Potential
60
60 One Dimensional PNP Poisson’s Equation Drift-diffusion & Continuity Equation Chemical Potential
61
61 Poisson Equation and Nernst Planck Equation (Fick’s Law for charged particles) are solved together by Gummel iteration Poisson Transport Poisson Transport Or much better (but much harder) Newton Iteration
62
62 I V INPUT OUTPUT THEORY PNP STRUCTURE Length, diameter, Permanent Charge Dielectric Coefficient EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS Bath concentrations Bath Potential Difference PNP Forward Problem
63
63 Current Voltage Relation Gramicidin 3D PNP Uwe Hollerbach
64
64 Fit of 1D PNP Current-Voltage 100 mM KCl OmpF G119D Duan Chen John Tang Rush Medical Center
65
65 V I PNP -1 Inverse Problem Input Output Theory EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS Bath Concentrations Bath Potential Difference EXPERIMENTS ELECTRICAL STRUCTURE Length, diameter, Permanent Charge Dielectric Coefficient PNP -1 Inverse Problem for Mathematicians What measurements best determine electrical structure? Stay tuned, Berger, Engl & Eisenberg
66
66 Charge Mutation in Porin Ompf G119D Figure by Raimund Dutzler Structure determined by x-ray crystallography in Tilman Schirmer’s lab
67
67 Net Charge Difference = 0.13 1.1 = 0.97e Duan Chen John Tang
68
68 Shielding Dominates Electric Properties of Channels, Proteins, as it does Ionic Solutions Shielding is ignored in traditional treatments of Ion Channels and of Active Sites of proteins Rate Constants Depend on Shielding and so Rate Constants Depend on Concentration and Charge Main Qualitative Result
69
69 Main Qualitative Result Shielding in Gramicidin Uwe Hollerbach Rush Medical Center
70
70 PNP misfits in some cases even with ‘optimal’ nonuniform D(x) Duan Chen John Tang Rush Medical Center
71
71 Shielding/PNP is not enough PNP includes Correlations only in the Mean Field PNP ignores ion- ion correlations and discrete particle effects: Single Filing, Crowded Charge Dielectric Boundary Force
72
72 Neither Field Theory nor Statistical Mechanics easily accommodates Finite Size of Ions and Protein Side-chains How can that be changed? Learn from Mathematicians and/or Physical Chemists Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
73
73 Learning with Mathematicians Zeev Schuss, Boaz Nadler, Amit Singer Dept’s of Mathematics Tel Aviv University, Yale University Molecular Biophysics, Rush Medical College We extend usual chemical treatment to include flux and spatially nonuniform boundary conditions We have concrete results only in the uncorrelated case! We have learned how to derive PNP (by mathematics alone). Count trajectories, not states. Compute Field Equations, not pair-wise forces.
74
74 Counting Langevin Trajectories in a Channel (between absorbing boundary conditions ) implies PNP (with some differences) PNP measures the density of trajectories (nearly) Zeev Schuss, Amit Singer: Tel Aviv Univ Boaz Nadler: Yale Univ,
75
75 Conditional PNP Electric Force depends on Conditional Density of Charge Nernst-Planck gives UNconditional Density of Charge mass friction Schuss, Nadler, Eisenberg
76
76 Boaz Nadler and Uwe Hollerbach Yale University Dept of Mathematics & Rush Medical Center Dielectric Boundary Force DBF PNP ignores correlations induced by Discovered by Coalson-Kurnikova, Chung-Corry, … not us!
77
77 Counting gives PNP with corrections 1)Correction for Dielectric Boundary Force* 2) NP (diffusion) equation describes probability of location but 3) Poisson equation depends on a conditional probability of location of charge, i.e., probability of location of trajectories, given that a positive ion is in a definite location. 4) Relation of is not known but can be estimated by closure relations, as in equilibrium statistical mechanics. 5) Closure relations involve correlations from single filing, finite volume of ions, boundary conditions, not well understood, … yet. Stay Tuned! *by derivation, not assumption
78
78 Until mathematics is available, we Follow the Physical Chemists, even if their approximations are ‘irrational’, i.e., do not have error bounds. Bob Eisenberg blames only himself for this approach
79
79 Physical Chemistry has shown that Chemically Specific Properties of ions come from their Diameter and Charge (much) more than anything else. Physical Models are Enough Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
80
80 Physical Theories of Plasma of Ions Determine (±1-2%) Activity* of ionic solutions from Infinite dilution, to Saturated solutions, even in Ionic melts. *Free Energy per Mole Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
81
81 Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks! Ions in a solution are a Highly Compressible Plasma Central Result of Physical Chemistry although the Solution itself is Incompressible
82
82 } Concentration-independent geometric restrictions solvation (Born) terms Ideal term electrochemical potential of point particles in the electrostatic mean-field includes Poisson equation Excess chemical potential Finite size effects Spatial correlations Chemical potential has three components
83
83 Simplest Physical Theory MSA Electrostatic Spheres Hard Spheres Ionic radii I are known values in bulk Learned from Lesser Blum & Doug Henderson … Thanks! We use Simonin-Turq formulation.
84
84 Properties of Highly Compressible Plasma of Ions Similar Results are computed by many Different theories and Simulations MSA is only simplest. We (and others) have used MSA, SPM, MC, and DFT MSA : M ean S pherical A pproximation SPM: S olvent P rimitive M odel MC: M ont e C arlo Simulation DFT: D ensity F unctiona l T heory of Solutions Most Accurate Atomic Detail Calibrated ! Inhomogeneous Systems
85
85 back to channels Selectivity in Channels Wolfgang Nonner, Dirk Gillespie University of Miami and Rush Medical Center
86
86 Binding Curve Wolfgang Nonner
87
87 O½O½ Selectivity Filter Selectivity Filter Crowded with Charge Wolfgang Nonner
88
MSA Theory of Selective Binding Classical Donnan Equilibrium of Ion Exchanger Solve the simultaneous equations for by iteration Protein Permanent Charge Volume Occupied by Protein Pressures are not Equal Mobile Ions: Mobile Ions
89
89 Understand Selectivity well enough to Make a Calcium Channel using techniques of molecular genetics, site-directed Mutagenesis Goal: George Robillard, Henk Mediema, Wim Meijberg
90
90 General Biological Theme (‘adaptation’) Selectivity Arises in a Crowded Space Biological case: 0.1 M NaCl and 1 M CaCl 2 in the baths As the volume is decreased, water is excluded from the filter by crowded charge effects Ca 2+ enters the filter and displaces Na + Biological Case Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
91
91 Sensitivity to Parameters Volume Dielectric Coefficient
92
92 Trade-offs ‘1. 5’ adjustable parameters Volume Dielectric Coefficient
93
93 Binding Curves Sensitivity to Parameters 0.75 nm 3 volume 0.20 nm 3 volume
94
94 At Large Volumes Electrical Potential can Reverse 0.75 nm 3 volume 0.20 nm 3 volume - - 0 Potential- - 0 Potential Positive Negative
95
95 Competition of Metal Ions vs. Ca ++ in L-type Ca Channel Nonner & Eisenberg
96
96 Similar Results have been found by Henderson, Boda, et al. Hansen, Melchiona, Allen, et al., Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg, et al., Using MSA, SPM, MC and DFT for the L-type Ca Channel MSA: Mean Spherical Approximation SPM: Solvent Primitive Model MC: Monte Carlo Simulation DFT: Density Functional Theory of Solutions Atomic Detail Calibrated! Most Accurate Inhomogeneous Systems
97
97 Best Result to Date with Atomic Detail Monte Carlo, including Dielectric Boundary Force Dezso Boda, Dirk Gillespie, Doug Henderson, Wolfgang Nonner Na + Ca ++
98
98 Other Properties of Ion Channels are likely to involve more subtle physics including orbital delocalization and chemical binding Selectivity apparently does not! Learned from Doug Henderson, J.-P. Hansen, among others…Thanks!
99
99 Ionic Selectivity in Protein Channels Crowded Charge Mechanism Simplest Version: MSA How does Crowded Charge give Selectivity?
100
100 General Biological Theme (‘adaptation’) Selectivity Arises in a Crowded Space Biological case: 0.1 M NaCl and 1 M CaCl 2 in the baths As the volume is decreased, water is excluded from the filter by crowded charge effects Ca 2+ enters the filter and displaces Na + Biological Case Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
101
101 Ionic Selectivity in Protein Channels Crowded Charge Mechanism 4 Negative Charges of glutamates of protein DEMAND 4 Positive Charges nearby either 4 Na + or 2 Ca ++
102
102 Ionic Selectivity in Protein Channels Crowded Charge Mechanism Simplest Version: MSA 2 Ca ++ are LESS CROWDED than 4 Na +, Ca ++ SHIELDS BETTER than Na +, so Protein Prefers Calcium
103
103 2 Ca ++ are LESS CROWDED than 4 Na +
104
104 What does the protein do? Selectivity arises from Electrostatics and Crowding of Charge Certain MEASURES of structure are Powerful DETERMINANTS of Function e.g., Volume, Dielectric Coefficient, etc. Precise Arrangement of Atoms is not involved in the model, to first order.
105
105 Protein provides Mechanical Strength Volume of Pore Dielectric Coefficient/Boundary Permanent Charge Precise Arrangement of Atoms is not involved in the model, to first order. but Particular properties ‘measures’ of the protein are crucial! What does the protein do?
106
106 Mechanical Strength Volume of Pore Dielectric Coefficient/Boundary Permanent Charge But not the precise arrangement of atoms Implications for Artificial Channels Design Goals are
107
107 Implications for Traditional Biochemistry Traditional Biochemistry focuses on Particular locations of atoms
108
108 Traditional Biochemistry assumes Rate Constants Independent of Concentration & Conditions
109
109 Implications for Traditional Biochemistry Traditional Biochemistry (more or less) Ignores the Electric Field
110
110 But Rate Constants depend steeply on Concentration and Electrical Properties* because of shielding, a fundamental property of matter, independent of model, in my opinion. *nearly always
111
111 Electrostatic Contribution to ‘Dissociation Constant’ is large and is an Important Determinant of Biological Properties Change of Dissociation ‘Constant’ with concentration is large and is an Important Determinant of Biological Properties
112
112 Traditional Biochemistry ignores Shielding and Crowded Charge although Shielding Dominates Properties of Ionic Solutions and cannot be ignored in Channels and Proteins in my opinion
113
113 Make a Calcium Channel using techniques of molecular genetics, site-directed Mutagenesis How can we use these ideas? George Robillard, Henk Mediema, Wim Meijberg BioMaDe Corporation, Groningen, Netherlands
114
114 More?
115
115 Function can be predicted From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws (sometimes, in some cases). Conclusion
116
116 More?
117
117 Make a Calcium Channel using techniques of molecular genetics, site-directed Mutagenesis How can we use these ideas? George Robillard, Henk Mediema, Wim Meijberg BioMaDe Corporation, Groningen, Netherlands
118
118 Strategy Use site-directed mutagenesis to put in extra glutamates and create an EEEE locus in the selectivity filter of OmpF Site-directed mutagenesis R132 R82 E42 E132 R42 A82 Wild typeEAE mutant E117 D113 George Robillard, Henk Mediema, Wim Meijberg BioMaDe Corporation, Groningen, Netherlands
119
119 Zero-current potential or reversal potential = measure of ion selectivity Henk Mediema Wim Meijberg
120
120 Ca 2+ over Cl - selectivity (P Ca /P Cl ) recorded in 1 : 0.1 M CaCl 2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS (1) Conclusions: - Taking positive charge out of the constriction zone ( = -3, see control mutant AAA) enhances the cation over anion permeability. - Putting in extra negative charge ( = -5, see EAE mutant) further increases the cation selectivity. Henk Mediema Wim Meijberg
121
121 Ca 2+ over Na + selectivity (P Ca /P Na ) recorded in 0.1 M NaCl : 0.1 M CaCl 2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS (2) Conclusion: - Compared to WT, EAE shows just a moderate increase of the Ca 2+ over Na + selectivity. - To further enhance P Ca /P Na may require additional negative charge and/or a change of the ‘dielectric volume’. Work in Progress! Henk Mediema Wim Meijberg
122
122 Selectivity Differs in Different Types of Channels Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie Other Types of Channels
123
123 Ca channel Na channel Cl channel K channel prefers Small ions Ca 2+ > Na + prefers Small ions Na + > Ca 2+ Na + over K + prefers Large ions prefers K + > Na + Selectivity filter EEEE 4 − charges Selectivity filter DEKA 2 −, 1+ charge Selectivity filter hydrophobic partial charges Selectivity filter single filing partial charges PNP/DFTMonte CarloBulk ApproxNot modeled yet Selectivity of Different Channel Types The same crowded charge mechanism can explain all these different channel properties with surprisingly little extra physics.
124
124 Sodium Channel (with D. Boda, D. Busath, and D. Henderson) Related to Ca ++ channel removing the positive lysine (K) from the DEKA locus makes calcium-selective channel High Na + selectivity 1 mM CaCl 2 in 0.1 M NaCl gives all Na + current (compare to calcium channel) only >10 mM CaCl 2 gives substantial Ca ++ current Monte Carlo method is limited (so far) to a uniform dielectric Stay tuned…. Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
125
125 Na + Ca ++ Na + /Ca 2+ Competition in the Sodium Channel Biological Region Ca ++ in bath (M) Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
126
126 Model gives small-ion selectivity. Result also applies to the calcium channel. Na + /Alkali Metal Competition in Na + Channel Biological Region Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
127
127 ‘New’ result from PNP/SPM combined analysis Spatial Nonuniformity in Na + Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
128
128 Na + vs K + Selectivity Na + K + Channel Protein Na + Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
129
129 Na + Channels Select Small Na + over Big K + because (we predict) Protein side chains are small allowing Small Na + to Pack into Niches K + is too big for the niches! Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie Summary of Na + Channel
130
130 Sodium Channel Summary Na + channel is a Poorly Selective Highly Conducting Calcium channel, which is Roughened so it prefers Small Na + over big K + Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
131
131 Cl − Selective Channel Selective for Larger Anions The Dilute Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
132
132 Chloride Channel Channel prefers large anions in experiments, Low Density of Charge (several partial charges in 0.75 nm 3 ) Selectivity Filter contains hydrophobic groups these are modeled to (slightly) repel water this results in large-ion selectivity Conducts only anions at low concentrations Conducts both anions and cations at high concentration Current depends on anion type and concentration Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie Doug Henderson Dezso Boda
133
133 Biological Case Chloride Channel Selectivity depends Qualitatively on concentration Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
134
134 The Dilute Channel: Anion Selective Channel protein creates a Pressure difference between bath and channel Large ions like Cl – are Pushed into the channel more than smaller ions like F – Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
135
135 Key: Hydrophobic Residues Repel Water giving Large-ion selectivity (in both anion and cation channels). Peculiar non-monotonic conductance properties and IV curves observed in experiments Hydrophobic repulsion can give gating. ‘Vacuum lock’ model of gating (M. Green, D. Henderson; J.-P. Hansen; Mark Sansom; Sergei Sukarev) Chloride Channel Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
136
136 Conclusion Each channel type is a variation on a theme of Crowded Charge and Electrostatics, Each channel types uses particular physics as a variation. Wolfgang Nonner Dirk Gillespie
137
137 Function can be predicted From Structure given Fundamental Physical Laws (sometimes, in some cases).
138
138 More? DFT
139
139 Density Functional and Poisson Nernst Planck model of Ion Selectivity in Biological Ion Channels Dirk Gillespie Wolfgang Nonner Department of Physiology and Biophysics University of Miami School of Medicine Bob Eisenberg Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology Rush Medical College, Chicago
140
140 We (following many others) have used Many Theories of Ionic Solutions as Highly Compressible Plasma of Ions with similar results MSA, SPM, MC and DFT MSA : M ean S pherical A pproximation SPM: S olvent P rimitive M odel MC: M ont e C arlo Simulation DFT: D ensity F unctiona l T heory of Solutions Most Accurate Atomic Detail Inhomogeneous Systems
141
141 Density Functional and Poisson Nernst Planck model of Ion Selectivity in Biological Ion Channels Dirk Gillespie Wolfgang Nonner Department of Physiology and Biophysics University of Miami School of Medicine Bob Eisenberg Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology Rush Medical College, Chicago
142
142 We (following many others) have used Many Theories of Ionic Solutions as Highly Compressible Plasma of Ions with similar results MSA, SPM, MC and DFT MSA : M ean S pherical A pproximation SPM: S olvent P rimitive M odel MC: M ont e C arlo Simulation DFT: D ensity F unctiona l T heory of Solutions Most Accurate Atomic Detail Inhomogeneous Systems
143
143 Density Functional Theory HS excess chemical potential is from free energy functional Energy density depends on “non-local densities” Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
144
144 HS excess chemical potential is Free energy functional is due to Yasha Rosenfeld and is considered more than adequate by most physical chemists. The double convolution is hard to compute efficiently. Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg We have extended the functional to Charged Inhomogeneous Systems with a bootstrap perturbation method that fits MC simulations nearly perfectly.
145
145 Example of an Inhomogeneous Liquid A two-component hard- sphere fluid near a wall in equilibrium (a small and a large species). Near the wall there are excluded-volume effects that cause the particles to pack in layers. These effects are very nonlinear and are amplified in channels because of the high densities. small species large species Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
146
146 The Problem We are interested in computing the flux of ions between two baths of fixed ionic concentrations. Across the system an electrostatic potential is applied. Separating the two baths is a lipid membrane containing an ion channel. ionic concentrations and electrostatic potential held constant far from channel ionic concentrations and electrostatic potential held constant far from channel membrane with ion channel Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
147
147 Modeling Ion Flux The flux of ion species i is given by the constitutive relationship The flux follows the gradient of the total chemical potential. where D i is the diffusion coefficient i is the number density i is the total chemical potential of species i Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
148
148 } concentration-independent geometric restrictions solvation (Born) terms ideal term electrochemical potential of point particles in the electrostatic mean-field includes Poisson equation excess chemical potential the “rest”: the difference between the “real” solution and the ideal solution The chemical potential has three components Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
149
149 When ions are charged, hard spheres the excess chemical potential is split into two parts } } Electrostatic Component describes the electrostatic effects of charging up the ions Hard-Sphere Component describes the effects of excluded volume the centers of two hard spheres of radius R cannot come closer than 2R Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
150
150 Density Functional Theory HS excess chemical potential comes from free energy functional Energy density depends on “non-local densities” Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
151
151 HS excess chemical potential is Free energy functional is due to Yasha Rosenfeld and is considered more than adequate by most physical chemists. The double convolution is hard to compute efficiently. Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg We have extended the functional to Charged Inhomogeneous Systems with a bootstrap perturbation method that fits MC simulations nearly perfectly.
152
152 Density Functional Theory Energy density depends on “non-local densities”: Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
153
153 Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg The non-local densities ( = 0, 1, 2, 3, V1, V2) are averages of the local densities: where is the Dirac delta function, is the Heaviside step function, and R i is the radius of species i.
154
154 We use Rosenfeld’s perturbation approach to compute the electrostatic component. Specifically, we assume that the local density i (x) is a perturbation of a reference density i ref (x): The ES Excess Chemical Potential Density Functional Theory Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
155
155 The Reference Fluid In previous implementations, the reference fluid was chosen to be a bulk fluid. This was both appropriate for the problem being solved and made computing its ES excess chemical potential straight-forward. However, for channels a bulk reference fluid is not sufficient. The channel interior can be highly-charged and so 20+ molar ion concentrations can result. That is, the ion concentrations inside the channel can be several orders of magnitude larger than the bath concentrations. For this reason we developed a formulation of the ES functional that could account for such large concentration differences. Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
156
156 Test of ES Functional To test our ES functional, we considered an equilibrium problem designed to mimic a calcium channel. two compartments were equilibrated edge effects fully computed 24 M O -1/2 CaCl 2 NaCl or KCl 0.1 M The dielectric constant was 78.4 throughout the system. Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
157
157 Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
158
158 Nonner, Gillespie, Eisenberg
159
159 Conclusion: Density Functional Theory can Include Electrostatics
160
160 ‘New’ Mathematics is Needed: Analysis of Simulations
161
161 Can Simulations serve as “Fundamental Physical Laws”? Direct Simulations are Problematic Even today
162
162 Can simulations serve as fundamental physical laws? Direct Simulations are Problematic Even today Simulations so far cannot reproduce macroscopic variables and phenomena known to dominate biology
163
163 Simulations so far often do not reproduce Concentration (i.e., number density) (or activity coefficient) Energy of Electric Field Ohm’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Fick’s ‘law’ (in simple situations) Conservation Laws (e.g., of energy) Fluctuations in number density
164
164 The larger the calculation, the more work done, the greater the error First Principle of Numerical Integration First Principle of Experimentation The more work done, the less the error Simulations as fundamental physical laws (?)
165
165 How do we include Macroscopic Variables in Atomic Detail Calculations? Another viable approach is Hierarchy of Symplectic Simulations
166
166 Analysis of Simulations e.g., How do we include Macroscopic Variables Conservation laws in Atomic Detail Calculations? Because mathematical answer is unknown, I use an Engineering Approach Hierarchy of Low Resolution Models
167
167 Simulations produce too many numbers 10 6 trajectories each 10 -6 sec long, with 10 9 samples in each trajectory, in background of 10 22 atoms Why not simulate?
168
168 Simulations need a theory that Estimates Parameters (e.g., averages) or Ignores Variables Theories and Models are Unavoidable! (in my opinion)
169
169 Symplectic integrators are precise in ‘one’ variable at a time! It is not clear (at least to me) that symplectic integrators can be precise in all relevant variables at one time
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.