Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLorin Wilcox Modified over 9 years ago
1
Robert L Wears, MD, MS University of Floridawears@ufl.eduwears@ufl.edu Imperial College London École des Mines de Paris Why Has Crowding Been Intractable? Views from System Dynamics and Resilience Engineering ED / Hospital Overcrowding “There are no side effects. There are only effects.” J Sterman
2
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Overview and goals Introduction to system dynamics methods Causal loop diagrams, stocks & flows, dynamic simulations System dynamics and overcrowding Prototypical causal loops Modeling ED / hospital overcrowding Potential implications from a SD approach Understanding – how did the present come about? Action – what can we do, what should we not do?
3
ED / Hospital Overcrowding 4 years ago …
4
ED / Hospital Overcrowding James Fallows’ question How is it that a system that is – so technologically advanced and operated by such smart people who are all working very hard – performs so poorly?
5
ED / Hospital Overcrowding James Fallows’ question How is it that a system that is -- so technologically advanced and operated by such smart people who are all working very hard – performs so poorly? Is this as good as it gets?
6
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Is there something in the structure of the system? Work patterns, peak & valley variation, artefacts, organisational policies, goals, etc all play a role But are they sufficient explanations? Is there more? Are there factors that can explain overcrowding, and consequent resilient or brittle behaviours of the system at some higher level of abstraction?
7
ED / Hospital Overcrowding System dynamics models Developed in ’60s in control engineering (Maruyama) Popularized in 70-80s (Forrester, Sterman) Used mostly in business settings (unfortunately?) Useful in: Explaining counter-intuitive phenomena, especially in complex sociotechnical systems, when effects are time-delayed, multiple feedback loops, etc Determining where (where not) to intervene
8
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Fundamental lessons from system dynamics System structure influences system behaviour “Systems cause their own crises, not external forces or individuals’ mistakes” Structure in systems is subtle “Structure” = basic interrelationships among variables that control behaviour “Policy resistance”, “unintended consequences”, “intractability” come from lack of system thinking “Yesterday’s solution becomes today’s problem” Crowding a problem since mid 1980s Quarter century of work No progress, in fact, worse
9
ED / Hospital Overcrowding System dynamic methods Causal loop diagrams Feedback, positive & negative Delays Dynamic simulations Stocks Flows
10
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Causal loop diagrams
11
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Causal loop diagrams Reinforcing loop Positive feedback
12
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Reinforcing loops Growth, often exponential Bandwagon effect, compound interest, bacterial growth, … Rate of change increases Virtuous cycle Good service → more business → more money → better people, equipment → more good service … Exercise → sense of well-being → more exercise Vicious cycle Perceived gasoline shortage → “topping off” → lines at stations → greater perceived shortage … Often unstable Run on bank Arms race Gas crises
13
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Reinforcing loop behaviour – exponential growth
14
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Causal loop diagrams
15
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Causal loop diagrams Balancing loop Negative feedback
16
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Balancing loops Goal-seeking behaviour Homeostatic Stabilizing Rate of change decreases Thermostat, physiologic autoregulation, radioactive decay Responsive to change in goal state Resist all other changes
17
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Balancing loop behaviour – goal seeking
18
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Causal loop diagrams – delays
19
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Balancing loop & delay behaviour – damped oscillation
20
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Balancing loop with delays Oscillation and goal-seeking Balance depends on competing magnitudes of action and delay More vigorous action → greater instability Make haste slowly!
21
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Delays are common
22
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Stocks and flows “ED visits” in previous examples is a composite Components are: Rate of new arrivals (eg, pts per hour) Number of pts currently in ED Rate of departures
23
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Input – throughput – output model
24
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Basic elements combine to represent complex systems No limit to the possible ways to combine reinforcing, balancing loops, delays, stocks, flows Some archetypical forms occur over and over Exponential growth Goal seeking Oscillation Complex, nonlinear interactions Sigmoid shaped growth Sigmoid growth w/ overshoot, oscillation Growth and collapse* Random Chaotic
25
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Growth & collapse – a cautionary tale?
26
ED / Hospital Overcrowding A cautionary tale
27
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Hysteresis
28
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Predator-prey example
29
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Predator-prey example
30
ED / Hospital Overcrowding The ‘balance of nature’?
31
ED / Hospital Overcrowding The ‘balance of nature’?
32
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Response to an insult What will happen to foxes if drought cuts rabbit population in years 16 – 17?
33
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Almost nothing
34
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Objectives To use system dynamic modeling as a way to illuminate resilience (or collapse) related to ED overcrowding To identify more general underlying models of resilience / collapse in complex sociotechnical systems To identify factors associated with performance that could inform organisational policy / procedure
35
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Modeling process Two levels of modeling Scope hospital (not ED) level Societal (emergency medicine) level Two-pronged approach Abstract models displaying interesting behaviours Calibrated models expressive of domain constituencies in multiple sites Iteration between these two modes
36
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Simplest model: input – throughput – output
37
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Response to challenge
38
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Catastrophic dynamics
39
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Simple model, augmented w/ adaptive capacity
40
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Adaptive dynamics
41
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Effect of memory of adaptations
42
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Simple model conclusions Highly simplified, input-throughput-output model can demonstrate brittleness, resilience, and adaptation But: It’s a tautology And domain experts won’t buy it, it’s too simple
43
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Feedback from domain Input – throughput – output far too simple Too much is packed into ‘output’ Multiple compartment models Multiple additional effects? Cyclical? Acuity? Temporal – arousement, fatigue, etc
44
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Extended models
45
ED / Hospital Overcrowding More interesting observations Resilience from what point of view? Ironies of process improvement Co-dependency
46
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Disjoint views of resilience
47
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Disjoint views of resilience
48
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Addiction, co-dependency Delay
49
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Irony of improvement
50
ED / Hospital Overcrowding Summary & Conclusions “All models are wrong, but some models are useful” -- George E P Box Very simple models can demonstrate resilient / brittle behaviours Simple models can suggest: Complex mixture of gains and losses 2° to crowding Perverse effects of improvement attempts Origins of intra-organisational conflict Building / restoring ‘capacity’ may be more useful than limiting volume To be continued …
51
ED / Hospital Overcrowding
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.