1. Mark Hallett Senior Director, International Student & Scholar Services International Students at CSU: Dramatic Growth and a Quality Experience

2. International Students at Selected U.S. Doctoral Institutions 2010-11 Institution International Students U. Of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign7,991 Purdue U. main campus7,562 Ohio State U. main campus6,082 U. Of Michigan at Ann Arbor5,995 Michigan State U. 5,748 Indiana U. at Bloomington5,471 U. Of Minnesota – Twin Cities5,124 U. Of Wisconsin at Madison4,647 Iowa State U.3,631 North Carolina State U. 3,235

6. International Students as a Percent of the Total Student Population ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Purdue University15% Iowa State University11% Michigan State University11% Texas A & M University 9% North Carolina State University 8% Ohio State University 8% Oklahoma State University 8% Washington State University 6% Oregon State University 5% Colorado State University 4% University of California, Davis 4% Board of Governors Peer Comparison

7. International Student Enrollment Scenarios for CSU Total Enrollment 26,000 28,000 36,000 4% Int’l Students 1,040 1,120 1,440 8% Int’l Students 2,080 2,240 2,880 10% Int’l Students 2,600 2,800 3,600

8. CSU Goals for 2020 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3,000 international students (~8%) 1,000 INTO students in that 3,000 enrollment 800 other new international students 1,200 Chinese students (40% of int’l students) – 400 CSU partner schools – 400 INTO students – 400 other

9. International Student Barometer Overviews for CSU Overall satisfaction with educational experience Learning Living experience Student support National Rank (25) 3 2 Int’l Rank (240) 9 10 20 9

10. Categories in which CSU ranked #1 in U.S. ______________________________________________________________ quality of teachers expert lecturers research safety campus environment dining services eco-friendly attitude “good place to be” social activities

11. COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS FALL 2011 International Student Barometer Survey

12. What is the ISB Students invited to participate from October to December 2011 209,422 international students responded from 238 institutions in 16 countries Institution-specific results compared against comparator groups, national and international benchmarks

13. Benchmark Group: Participating Institutions Colorado State University DePaul University Long Island University Iowa State University University of Pittsburgh Indiana University Bloomington Indiana U—Purdue U Indianapolis University of Cincinnati Northeastern University Arizona State University Michigan State University Western Michigan University The George Washington University Drexel University Kent State University State University of New York Oswego State University of New York New Platz Stony Brook University SUNY Plattsburgh The Fashion Institute of Technology

14. Areas of Strength Learning above ISB and U.S. averages in all statistically significant elements:  Teaching  Content elements Living ranked very highly:  Quality of location  Facilities  People elements Satisfaction with all support elements above 80%

15. U.S Support Elements Ranked #1:  Dining services Ranked #2:  Lory Student Center  Office of International Programs  Cashier’s Office Ranked #3:  Student clubs and associations  CASA  KEY  Academic advising  Counseling

16. Opportunities for Improvement Student arrival  Airport Pick-up Transportation Integration with campus community Diverse community Worship facilities Career Services

17. Support Utilization Implications as international enrollment increases?