Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The European NPMs: facts, figures and trends Association for the Prevention of Torture Association pour la prévention de la torture Asociación para la.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The European NPMs: facts, figures and trends Association for the Prevention of Torture Association pour la prévention de la torture Asociación para la."— Presentation transcript:

1 The European NPMs: facts, figures and trends Association for the Prevention of Torture Association pour la prévention de la torture Asociación para la prevención de la tortura Strasbourg, 5 November 2009

2 Content of the presentation 1.The OPCAT: an innovative tool to prevent torture 2.Trends of NPMs in the European region 3.Current trends of NPMs in the region

3 1. The OPCAT: an innovative tool to prevent torture Mandate of the OPCAT preventive bodies -operational function: detention monitoring; regular and unannounced visits to all places of detention -an orientation function: advice, observations and recommendations on legislations and on improving domestic preventive measures

4 2. OPCAT and NPMs: facts and figures

5 Designated NPMs NPM designation processes in States Parties NPM designation processes in States Signatories

6 2. NPMs in Europe: facts and figures 26 States Parties 11 Signatories 20 NPMs designated in Europe

7 3. Current trends of NPMs in the European region a) New body b) National Human Rights Institutions c) National Human Rights plus civil society organisations d) Several bodies

8 3.a) New body as NPM France, Germany and Liechtenstein Challenges: -Sufficient resources -Long term -Access to all places of detention -Recognition; perception of independence and legitimacy

9 3 b) National Human Rights Institutions as NPM Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Estonia, Poland and Spain With a preventive unit: Albania, Czech Republic and Georgia Challenges: -Change of approach -OPCAT compliance -Necessary changes: mandate, resources, institutional and working methods -Access to all places of detention

10 3 c) National Human Rights Institutions plus civil society organisations Denmark, Macedonia (potentially), Moldova and Slovenia Challenges: -Degree of involvement of civil society organisations -Immunities and protection -Independence -Workload -Division of tasks, responsibilities and decision-making

11 3 d) Several bodies as NPM Malta, United Kingdom NHRIs plus other monitoring bodies: Sweden Challenges: -Coordination -Coverage of all places of detention -Coherence

12 Any questions? Comments?


Download ppt "The European NPMs: facts, figures and trends Association for the Prevention of Torture Association pour la prévention de la torture Asociación para la."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google