Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis(es): Quantifying Chicken Bone Decalcification by Mass Section 102 GROUP.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis(es): Quantifying Chicken Bone Decalcification by Mass Section 102 GROUP."— Presentation transcript:

1 University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis(es): Quantifying Chicken Bone Decalcification by Mass Section 102 GROUP 1B AIMS:  Determine mass percent of calcium in chicken femur shafts  Quantify percent calcium lost as a function of decalcification time HYPOTHESES:  Calcium lost from total decalcification will account for ~13% of bone mass  The relationship between decalcification and time will follow a logarithmic relationship

2 University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Methods, Protocol & Equipment: Pre-lab Week 1.Prepare 5 chicken bones. 2.Place one sample in beaker A containing 20 mL RapidCal and the other sample in beaker B containing the same volume of water. Repeat for all 5 samples 3.Place beakers on agitator for the following week Lab Week 1.Dry and weigh bones from previous week 2.Prepare 25 chicken bones to make 50 samples (strip, cut, label A or B) 3.Take initial wet masses 4.Place samples into respective beakers, start timer 5.At t = 0, 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes respectively, removed paired samples, dry in oven, and take final masses

3 University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Proposed Results/Findings/Deliverables: 1) Pre-week bones/ In-lab bones Results: Two groups: 1) Bones in decalcifier; 2) Bones in DI H 2 O Values of % mass loss due to calcium loss = 100% * {final dry weight of bone in DI H 2 O - final dry weight decalcified bone} initial wet mass (2) initial wet mass (1) 2) Findings: Table Compile table % mass loss due to mineral detraction after: a) full week, b) 0 min, c) 5 min, d) 15 min, e) 30 min, f) 60 min Reasoning for timing : Expectation of logarithmic % calcium mass loss Compare b-f to a to determine % total calcium lost at time x = % mass loss due to calcium loss (at time x) % mass loss due to calcium loss (full week) 3) Deliverables: Further Use of Pilot Study Data A table of values relating calcium loss to time soaked in decalcifier for use in studies dealing with bone fracture strength, bone composition, etc.

4 University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Potential Pitfalls: 1. Bone piece dimensions not constant 2. Possibly too many bone samples to handle 3. Bone drying period may prove insufficient 4. Decalcifying for a week could be harmful 5. Underestimate of the total decalcification time

5 University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Materials and Budget & Justification: RapidCal™ (BBC Biochemical):1 gallon $59.00 -decalcification Autopsy Saw (Miami Medical) $1021.38 -accurately and precisely cut bones Stainless Steel Mesh Glove (Levitt-Safety) $96.51 -protection of the hand used to hold the bone during cutting Polypropylene 100ml Beakers (Fisher Scientific): 100 $29.50 -containers for all samples Chicken Legs (Purdue Drumsticks): 4 dozen $18.20 Total $1224.59


Download ppt "University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis(es): Quantifying Chicken Bone Decalcification by Mass Section 102 GROUP."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google