Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClaud Harris Modified over 9 years ago
1
NIAA Animal Health Emergency Management Council Cindy Cunningham Assistant Vice President, Communications National Pork Board 515-223-2600 ccunningham@pork.org
2
Source: USDA/FAS, PSD Data Share of Global Pork Exports
3
Top US Pork Export Markets: January 2014 Mexico 131.9 M lbs, ↑9% Japan 86.1, ↑4% China/HK 76.6, 0% Canada36.8, ↓12% Korea 25.1, ↓14% C/S Am24.9, ↑74% Oceania16.4, ↑16% ASEAN11.7, ↑7% Japan $163.4 M, ↓6% Mexico $113.2, ↑10% China/HK $82.7, ↑15% Canada $62.5, ↓6% Korea $33.3, ↓11% C/S Am $29.1, ↑79% Oceania $24.6, ↑25% ASEAN$12, ↑11% Volume (Million Pounds)Value (Million $) Source: USDA statistics compiled by USMEF, compared to 2013 Colombia ↑258% Singapore ↑627% New Zealand ↑63% 1/3 of U.S. exports
4
Exported Product Value to Producers For every $1 million dollars of muscle meats exported, live value increases by $0.05/CWT For every $1 million dollars of variety meats exported, live value increases by $0.20/CWT Variety Meat Product Domestic Price/lb. Exported Price/lb. Bungs$0.10$1.50 Ears$1.20$2.60 Front Feet$0.40$1.00 Hind Feet$0.20$0.70 Stomach$0.80$1.50 Tongues$0.60$1.65
5
How Do We Work To Keep Export Markets Open In A Crisis?
6
U.S. Pork Industry Crisis Plan Strategy
7
Pork Industry Organizational Responsibilities
8
National Pork Board Activate the communications efforts--overall coordination of team Provide scientific and communications resources Develop post-crisis communications and trade access maintenance plan domestic trade media producers
9
National Pork Producers Council Function as the liaison with government officials FAS FSIS APHIS USTR State Department In-country consultants DC-based embassies and ag staff OIE/Codex
10
U.S. Meat Export Federation Coordinate pipeline and in-transit product movement from and if needed back to the U.S. Function as a liaison Country directors Members Importers Distributors Retailers In-country FAS offices ATO offices Media inquiries related to trade
11
Within the First Hour At first notification of a crisis/outbreak, notify international trade crisis team Attend initial NPB, NPPC, USMEF crisis team meetings Send e-mail to international crisis team with call-in information for initial meeting of NPB, USMEF and NPPC. Assemble international trade team for initial meeting/call Distribute pork industry talking points, if available Review current industry responses from all three organizations Review international trade crisis plan, calling tree, responsibilities, assignments and country assumption lists Determine lead spokesperson/contact for international trade audiences) NPB, USMEF and NPPC staff will relay any pertinent information back to full their organizations’ full staff Define lead of international talking point revisions, to be in-sync with USDA/FAS talking points – Version 1: For international trade partners – Version 2: For domestic industry contacts
12
Detailed Crisis Plan Within the first three hours Within the first 24 hours Within the first 48 hours In the week that follows
13
FMD CROSS-SPECIES COMMUNICATIONS TEAM
14
FMD Cross-Species Team
15
Through coordination, these industries work together Operations and Communications Overall U.S. livestock crisis plan – Species-specific, yet in the interest of all
16
Research Overview
17
Research Objectives Before an outbreak, we want to understand current awareness and knowledge levels regarding: Awareness of vaccinations of livestock, Awareness and knowledge of FMD, and Top-of-mind concerns, if there was an FMD outbreak
18
Research Objectives Also want to explore consumers’ understanding and acceptance of various FMD message categories (last assessed in 2007) 1) Food Safety 2) Disease Impact and Management 3) FMD Containment 4) FMD Control 5) Vaccinations
19
Research Process Qualitative Two bulletin board focus groups (40 consumers) Focused on reactions to proposed messages Quantitative Online survey of 1,012 consumers to quantify perceptions and understanding of issues and messages Qualitative Two 90- minute online focus groups with seven consumers Focused on vaccination issues and messages All participants ate meat or dairy products at least two times each month. Mix of ages, sex, employment, education, ethnicity, income and geographic location.
20
People THINK they’ve heard of the disease...... but most often have it confused with HFMD People are interested...... and want more detail than anticipated People want reassurance... which means understanding there is collaboration and a plan Lessons Learned
21
Most Reassuring Messages Reassurance: The majority feels reassured by the different categories of messages. The FMD containment messages are the most reassuring.
22
Vaccination
23
Key Takeaways: Vaccination Collaboration is crucial People are more interested than anticipated Understanding the international landscape instills confidence
24
Vaccination Awareness Both qualitative and quantitative results suggest consumers do not have top-of-mind awareness of livestock vaccinations, yet the majority (55%) know animals are vaccinated when they think about it. “I don’t know if animals are currently being vaccinated. It would be fine with me if they do this, as long as they test the vaccine and make sure that it would not be harmful for humans.”
25
Vaccination Acceptance Consumers believe vaccines are necessary and routine for protecting humans, pets and livestock Some expressed concern about the potential for it to be passed to humans through consumption “I would not mind eating meat or milk from vaccinated animals as long as I know it is safe.”
26
A plurality (38%) of consumers who are aware of routine vaccinations feel this procedure makes meat or milk more safe to consume. One-fifth feels it makes products less safe. “Do you think these vaccines make the meat or milk more safe to eat, less safe to eat or have no effect on safety?” (n=587)
27
Vaccination Acceptance in the Context of an Outbreak Consumers are reassured by the messages that were tested – Some consumers would likely avoid consuming milk and meat until they knew it was under control – Consumers support vaccinations in the event of an FMD outbreak
28
Credible Sources 85% Vast majority of consumers consider government agencies credible sources of information. Fewer than half find livestock organizations credible. 28
29
The Bottom Line In the event of an FMD outbreak, communications should: – Assure consumers of food safety and what is being done to contain the outbreak – Reference trusted and credible organizations and sources – Provide resources for additional information – Integrate a human element
30
Questions Cindy Cunningham Assistant Vice President, Communications National Pork Board 515-223-2600 ccunningham@pork.org
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.