1. A Radiological Evaluation of Radiolucent Cages Containing Autogenous Bone Graft or Bovine Hydroxyapatite (BH) in Cervical Fusion: a Retrospective Study in 46 Consecutive Patients
Wei-Chieh Chang, Hsi-Kai Tsou, Wen-Shian Chen ¹, Chi-Chang Chen ¹,Ting-Hsien Kao, Chiung-Chyi Shen
Department of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
¹Department of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

2. Purpose:
Anterior cervical discetomy and fusion (ACDF) with PEEK cages are widely used as the surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis.
Cages containing cancellous bone can improve the bony fusion. However, donor site pain is still the major problem.
Hydroxyapatite graft is then introduced as substitute materials. The authors investigated the radiological results in cervical fusion with radiolucent cages between cancellous bone and bovine hydroxyapatite graft.

3. Materials and Methods:
From July 2004 to May 2006, there were 46 consecutive cases of 109 levels of cervical degenerative disease between C2 and C7.
A retrospective analysis of cage fillers were divided into two groups: Group A (23 patients with 56 levels) packed with bone marrow and group B (23 patients with 53 levels) packed with bovin hydroxyapatite graft.

4. Surgical procedure: Smith-Robinson right side and anterior lateral approach followed by neck collar 8-12 weeks
Radiological results were evaluated by two neuroradiologists blinded to any clinical data.
Bone fusion was defined by the presence of bony trabeculation across the graft-host interfaces
The Prolo scale and Odom’s criteria : economic and functional status
The fusion was evaluated at intervals of 4, 12 and 24 weeks.

5. Patients inclusion criteria:
>Failure in conservative therapy traction, physical or chiropractic therapy, radiofrequency and pharmacotherapy
Surgical levels :
>Neurologic deficits correlated with MRI and/or EMG/NCV findings

6. Results July 2004 to May 2006, 46 consecutive cases of 109 levels
Mean follow up 14.1 months
autogenous bone graft
sinbone
Characteristic
( n = 23 )
Sex
Men 14
( 60.9 % ) 13
( 56.5 % )
women 9
( 39.1 % ) 10
( 43.5 % )
Age
51.39 ± 2.27 ( ) #
59.39 ± 2.92 ( ) #
CAGE
PEEK1 11 17
CFRP2 12 6

7. Affected level(total)
( n = 56 )
( n = 53 )
C2-3 1 2
C3-4 10 12
C4-5
19(33%)
18(34%)
C5-6
20(36%)
16(30%)
C6-7 6 5
One level 3 4
Two levels 9
Three levels
9(39%)
7(30%)
Four levels
Radiculopathy
18(78%)
22(41%)
Myelopathy
5(22%)
11(48%)
Neck pain
2(8%)
Arm pain
13(57%)
16(70%)

9. Table : Prolo Score Economic Status Functional Status E1
Complete invalid F1
Total incapacity(or worse than before operation) E2
No gainful occupation including ability to do housework or continue retirement activities F2
Mild to moderate level of lower back pain and/or sciatica (or pain same as before operation) but able to perform all daily tasks of living. E3
Able to work but not at previous occupation F3
Low level of pain and able to perform all activities except sports E4
Working at previous occupation part-time or limited status F4
No pain, but patient has had one or more recurrences of lower back pain or sciatica E5
Able to work at previous occupation with no restrictions of any kind F5
Complete recovery, no recurrent episodes of lower back pain, able to perform all previous sports activities

10. Table2. poro scale(A/S兩組及前後比較)
autogenous bone graft
sinbone
Parameter
Mean
SEM
p-value m
poro scale
p < f**
術前 (0)
0.15
0.13
0.143
術後1 (1)
5.91
(1)>(0)
0.20
6.00
0.29
0.285
術後2 (2)
6.61
(2)>(0)
0.38
6.65
0.34
0.677
術後3 (3)
7.26
(3)>(0)
0.39
7.43
0.487
m Mann-Whitney U test. f Friedman test. @ Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
*:p<0.05 **:p<0.01
註：Mann-Whitney U test = A與S兩組之比較差異(類似independent t test)
Friedman test = 四組術前術後之總比較
Wilcoxon signed-rank test = 術前術後兩兩較
4.04
3.74

12. Fusion Two neuroradiologists blinded with clinical data
Post-op, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Lateral view of X-Ray
Osseous trabecular bone across the interface, trabecular bridging bone formation at the anterior and/or posterior cortex of the involved vertebral bodies, lucencies between cage and vertebral plates

13. Mrs Ju, 44 F, nuchal pain with radiating to right arm and lower limbs weakness for 6 months
CSMR, C3/4/5/6 4M
fusion
1 M

14. Mr. Liao, 49 M C4/5/6 Nuchal pain with radiating to LEFT arm for 1 year
fusion
Post-op

15. Mr. Yang, 64 M, C3-4, 6-7 CSMR, progressive nuchal pain with radiating to upper arms and lower limbs weakness for 2 years
Fusion
1 M
Post-op

16. Table3. Fusion, excellent outcome rates in both groups
autogenous bone graft
sinbone
p-value
Parameter
No. of patients / total %
Fusion rate
1 month
12 / 56
21.4 %
9 / 53
17.0 %
0.730
3 month
43 / 56
76.8 %
39 / 53
73.6 %
0.869
6 month
56 / 56
100.0 %
53 / 53 －
Odom’s criteria Excellent and good outcome rate
14 / 23
60.9 %
18 / 23
81.8 %
0.222
Yate's correction of contigency is used.

17. Complications
Autogenous bone graft
Sin bone
Iliac crest morbidity
Pain 18
Hematoma 1
Infection
Nerve injury
Interbody fusion
Breaking
Pull out
Subsidence
Pseudo-arthrosis
Re-open

18. Discussion Anterior approach to the cervical spine
Cloward ( J. Neurosurg 15: ,1958),
Smith and Robinson (J. Bone Joint Surg Am 44: , 1962 )
Kyphotic angulation, narrowing foramina, loss normal sagittal alignment >> fusion
Waters and Levinthal (Spine 19:2343-7, 1994) fusion with iliac crest bone graft
Donor site chronic pain(22%), hematoma, fracture, paresthetica (Spine 28:134-9 ,2003 )
Cages: immediate stability, resist axial displacement, minimize neck pain, maintain foraminal height and alignment, no donor site pain

19. Threaded titanium cage, polyestherstherketone (PEEK) cage, carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) cage containing autogenous bone graft for osteoconduction and osteoinduction, the mean time of fusion is less
Reduce the complication rate by 22% in comparison with autogenous iliac crest graft fusion --J Spinal Disord 13:511–514, 2000.
The PEEK cage is therefore a good substitute for AICG fusion in patients with cervical disc disease. --Neurosurgery 51: , 2002
Radiolucent cage: similar elasticity behavior, no MR signal distortion in follow-up, evaluation in fusion

20. Sinbone® (Purzer, TWN) : Ceramic from bovine cancellous bone:Ca10(PO4)6(OH) >> Osteoconductors, lack osteoinductive properties
Osteoinductive factors: osteoblast progenitor cells – periosteum, peritrabecular connective tissue and bone marrow ~J Cell Biocem 1994, 56:283-94
Osteoprogenitor cells were significantly more abundant in the iliac. It is advisable that iliac crest bone marrow would enhance vertebral interbody fusion Eur Spine J 2005, 14:645-8
In most studies, the cages were filled with autogenous bone taken from the iliac crest
~Acta Neurochir :1-8

21. Radiolucent cage containing BH

22. The fusion rate is better in group A (21
The fusion rate is better in group A (21.4%) then in group B(17%) in first month (No statistical significant p=0.73) No difference in six months after OP
Poro scale: No statistical significant in pre-op, post-op 4,8 and 12 weeks between both groups
Odom’s criteria excellent and good outcome rate (group A: 60.9%, group B: 81.8%, p=0.22) >> Myelopathy: Group A/B: 22%/48% >> Donor site pain: Group A/B: 78%/0%

23. Conclusion
Hydroxyapatite is a good substitute material as a cage filler
There were no donor site complications
The cervical fusion rate, postoperative Poro scale and Odom’s criteria had no difference.
Extended studies on these patient are indicated and are currently underway in our surgical group.

24. Comment…..