1. FarmPath WP1 Lee-Ann Sutherland 22 March 2013

2. Work Package One Tasks 12 tasks, 3 deliverables Knowledge exchange with previous EC projects Web-site: www.farmpath.eu Project flier and powerpoint presentation Academic book (negotiations and 9 chapters) Fact sheets and press releases National stakeholder partnership groups Conference papers and journal articles Formatting handbook from WP5 International Conference

3. Agreed points on the academic book AGREED : Lead authors: to have discussion with co-authors about authorship and expectations. If lead author thinks that co-authors have not put in the right amount of work then they can decide if they will be still be involved. The editorial board can intervene. AGREED : When write chapter to have chapter 2 in front of you all the time so that there is a clear line of thought. This will be with the teams in February. AGREED : Teresa has an exception for the scenario chapter. Earliest possible deadline would be after the end of the scenario process – end of September is the earliest – 30 th September is the deadline for this. ACTION: Geoff: contact Claire for a template for book chapter ACTION: Email Geoff if want to use photos and colour images with details about photos or anything else that people want to be in colour. – guideline – max 3 images, no colour

4. DRAFT Revised schedule May 6:Detailed outline/draft chapters circulated to co- authors May 13 – 17:FarmPath writing week – individual and group work on chapters and other publications Output: complete draft of chapter(s) 1 July:Chapters submitted to assigned editor. Note: chapters should be of journal submission quality (i.e. written to high standard, correctly formatted – not drafts) 30 July:Editors return reviewed chapters to author with constructive requests for revisions 1 Sept:Final chapters due with the editorial team These dates can and should be negotiated with the co-authors and the assigned editor

5. Writing Principles The audience for this book is primarily academic – chapters should therefore be of the quality of a peer-reviewed journal article. Chapters should contribute to the development of the conceptual framework (i.e. make reference to the concepts in the conceptual framework – Chapter 2) Chapters should be analytical rather than descriptive (see examples) Chapters should have introduction and concluding sections but it is not necessary to retain the outline submitted in the original book proposal. Chapters should be formatted and referenced according to the designated End-Note referencing format (circulated by Claire) Chapters must remain within word limits.

6. Cluster Chapter Guidelines Example: Countryside Consumption 5.1 Introduction (500) 5.2 Understanding countryside transitions: from spaces of production to spaces of consumption (1500) 5.3 Pluriactivity and non-commercial farming in the UK (1300) 5.4 The project ‘Solidarno CSA’ in Bulgaria (1300) 5.5 Small-scale farms as new residential areas: new roles for traditional production systems in Portugal (1300) 5.6 Discussion and conclusions (1100) Example: Alternative Marketing Channels (6000) 10.1 Introduction (500) 10.2 Alternative marketing channels in European rural areas (1200) 10.3 Farmers co-building new identity and relationships with society through alternative marketing channels (1200) 10.4 Use of market-based tools and sustainability issues: economical added value, environment, work, and access to food (1300) 10.5 Alternative marketing channels and local networking: a key aspect for regional transitional pathways (1300) 10.6 Conclusions (500)

7. Lead Author Expectations liaise with assigned editor (well in advance of deadlines) on dates chapter is due and expected back liaise with co-authors on writing expectations and agreeing internal deadlines among co-authors agree author order, ensuring co-authoring teams are recognised and participate responsible for meeting chapter deadlines responsible for ensuring high quality chapter submitted to assigned editor responsible for identifying and ensuring copyright on any images utilised in chapter responsible for ensuring the chapter is submitted in the designated Endnote referencing style responsible for ensuring that the chapter is the correct length

8. Authorship Expectations Active participation in the writing of the chapter Meeting agreed internal and external deadlines Raise concerns about authorship and author order with lead author, if not resolved then with editorial team

9. Agreed points from September 2012 AGREED : To tell the team before they submit an article. This is to avoid using data from other people’s initiative or to stop two groups publishing on the same topic – in general ownership issues. AGREED : Every six months all team to communicate all outputs, data, topic, authors etc. AGREED : Teams to consider possible joint papers.

10. Review of planned journal articles Paper submitted  Diaz, M., I. Darnhofer, C. Darrot and J-E. Beuret. Green tides in Brittany: what can we learn about niche-regime interactions? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions  Zagata, L. "We want farmers' marts!" Case study of emerging civic food networks in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture. New paper to be submitted shortly: Sutherland and Holstead: On-farm wind energy production in farm business decision-making (Land Use Policy) Others?

11. Review of planned journal articles Planned papers Diaz, M., E. Lintanf: article about young farmers contribution to transition process (French cases) Darrot, C., and L. Zagata: causes of very different rhythm of transition observed in a Western and Eastern case study of AMC. Sociological Approach. Zagata, L., and Hrabak, J. Analysis of biogas development in the Czech Republic. Zagata, L, and K. Boukalova. Typology of the Czech farmers’ markets. This is based on follow-up survey of the farmers’markets organizers in the Czech Republic. Zagata, L., Lostack, M., Sutherland, L., Holstead, K. The ‘young farmer problem’ in Europe: Setting a research agenda. Sutherland, L., Zagata, L., Peter, S. A view from the farm: on-farm renewable energy as a multi-regime transition. Sutherland, L., Flanigan, S. Incremental Regime Change: A Case study of Aberdeenshire. (This is a combined analysis of all three JHI initiatives.) Further JHI papers on countryside consumption, machinery rings and farmer up-take of wind turbines, based on Aberdeenshire cases Collaboration paper?

12. Proposed Final Conference Format Welcome (9:15 am) Burning policy issues (DG Agri/Research) (15 min) FarmPath Project (10 min) Solinsa Project (10 min) Carousel or guided poster session on main findings (65 minutes divided by half hour coffee break) Feedback from guided tour plus synthesis by one person per project (45 minutes) Lunch

13. Final conference – after lunch Two parallel sessions (90 min) What policy recommendations can we formulate: FAS, Horizon 2020, EIP, others? How to put results in practice (tools and methods link to EIP)? Coffee break (15 min) Presentation of plenary results (30 min) Concluding words – DG Agri (20 min) Close at 4:30