Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PHYSICAL CAPACITY COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS APRIL 26, 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PHYSICAL CAPACITY COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS APRIL 26, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PHYSICAL CAPACITY COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS APRIL 26, 2013

2 SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL CAPACITY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS The objective and charge of the Physical Capacity Committee is to identify additional spaces (general purpose classrooms) on campus to accommodate the projected additional 726.40 - 1,000 FTEs planned for academic growth. The Committee is to assess and find creative solutions to limited classroom space, alternate locations and evaluate class utilization and scheduling inefficiencies.

3 CAPACITY REQUIRED FOR GROWTH FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) Target FTE 2013/14 Academic Year 7,900 Current FTE (Per Spring 2013 SFDB) 7,173.60 FTE Deficient(726.40) Additional Global Recruitment FTE Target (Part of Target FTE) 300 - 500 Target Additional Capacity FTE 726.40 to 1,000 FTE

4 GENERAL PURPOSE ROOM UTILIZATION BASED ON FALL 2013 CLASS SCHEDULE There are 74 General Purpose Classrooms currently scheduled that range in seating capacity from 14 – 128 seats.  1 – 128 seat General Purpose Classroom  1 – 125 seat General Purpose Classroom  1 – 77 seat General Purpose Classroom  1 – 70 seat General Purpose Classroom  4 – 60 plus seat General Purpose Classrooms  6 – 50 seat General Purpose Classrooms  19 – 40 plus seat General Purpose Classrooms Of the 74 General Purpose Classrooms, 32 of the classrooms have nothing scheduled on Fridays. Of the remaining 42 classrooms, only 25 classrooms are scheduled and at less than 50% utilization. Classes are scheduled mostly in the mornings. Only 17 of the total 74 classrooms are fully scheduled and utilized on Fridays. The classroom sizes ranging from 14 to 64 seats have nothing scheduled on Fridays. Possible consideration is to implement the MWF module to increase room utilization.

5 SPACES CONSIDERED FOR FTE INCREASE Student Union first floor (two proposed classrooms - flexible classroom tables and chairs and lobby break out/study areas) Student Union second floor (two proposed classrooms - flexible classroom tables and chairs lecture/tablet-arm seating and lobby break out/study areas) Schroeder Hall (fixed lecture/tablet-arm seating)

6 REMODEL OF SPACES IDENTIFIED INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION, TECHNOLOGY AND FURNITURE CONSTRUCTION INCLUDES: Interior Finishes  Flooring  Paint  Acoustical Ceiling Tiles  Light Switching/Dimming  Light Fixture Lens Replacement  Window Blinds/Window Screening  Furniture TECHNOLOGY INCLUDES: Data Projector-Closed Caption capable, VGA connectivity, XGA minimum native resolution Projection Screens and Brackets-Controlled Screen Return Computers-Mac Mini, Intel Core Duo Monitor-VESA LCD Keyboards-Wired, USB Mice-Wired, USB

7 STUDENT UNION BUILDING FIRST FLOOR (Case Study Flexible Classroom Room No. 1 and Flexible Classroom No. 2 )

8 STUDENT UNION BUILDING CLASSROOM 1 Case Study Flexible Classroom Room No. 1 73 Stations (Case Study format tables and chairs) 170.09 FTE

9 STUDENT UNION BUILDING CLASSROOM 1 Case Study Flexible Classroom Room No. 1 (Case Study format tables and chairs)

10 STUDENT UNION BUILDING CLASSROOM 2 (Flexible Classroom No. 2) 75 Stations (tables and chairs) 174.75 FTE

11 STUDENT UNION BUILDING CLASSROOM 2 (Flexible Classroom No. 2 and No.4) (tables and chairs)

12 STUDENT UNION BUILDING SECOND FLOOR (Classroom No. 3 and Flexible Classroom No. 4)

13 STUDENT UNION BUILDING CLASSROOM 3 (Classroom No. 3) 31 Stations (tablet-arm chairs) 72.23 FTE

14 STUDENT UNION BUILDING CLASSROOM 2 (Flexible Classroom No. 3) (tablet-arm chairs)

15 STUDENT UNION BUILDING CLASSROOM 4 (Flexible Classroom No. 4) 54 Stations (tables and chairs) 125.82 FTE

16 SCHROEDER HALL (Lecture Space) 254 Stations (fixed seating tablet-arm chairs) 591.92 FTE

17 SCHROEDER HALL (Lecture Space) (fixed seating tablet-arm chairs)

18 SPACE SUMMARY BY BUILDING Building NameStation Count (Seats) FTEConstruction Budget Estimate Student Union233542.89$345,000 Schroeder Hall254591.82N/A Total4871,134.71$345,000

19 Facilities Management Physical Capacity Committee Christopher Dinno (Chair), AVP Admin. & Fin. Facilities Oper. & Planning Karin Enstam Jaffe, Faculty Anthropology Dennis Goss, Academic Resource Specialist Carol Ingerman, Director of Campus Planning John Kornfeld, AVP for Undergraduate Studies Paula Lane, Faculty School of Education Kevin Ryan, Network Analyst Bill Silver, Dean, School of Business and Economics Mike Visser, Faculty Economics Richard Whitkus, Faculty Biology


Download ppt "FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PHYSICAL CAPACITY COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS APRIL 26, 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google