Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAugusta Carr Modified over 9 years ago
1
Significant New “Learnings” From An Integrated Study Of An Old Field, Foster/South Cowden Field (Grayburg & San Andres), Ector County, Texas. Robert C. Trentham, DGS Center for Energy and Economic Diversification University of Texas of the Permian Basin
2
Project Results 290,000 BO Incremental Production 1996 to present
>650,000 BO Incremental Reserves 3 Re-entries 4 New Drills >12 Workovers Economic life of field extended from 9 to 16 years
3
Sec 36 Production 1977 to 1993
4
Bottom Line
5
“Learnings” Came in All Areas
Reservoir Characterization Well Testing Re-completions Production
6
INTEGATED STUDY GEOLOGICAL MODEL 3D SEISMIC / INVERSION MODELING
FLOW MODELING HISTORY MATCH SIMULATION WELL WORK, TESTING, AND MONITORING
7
PROCEEDURES PRODUCTION TESTING PRESSURE TRANSIENT TESTING
WATER CHEMISTRY WELL WORK
8
Type Log Queen Upper Grayburg –Main Pay Lower Grayburg – Minor Pay
San Andres – Large OOIP
9
FOSTER FIELD
10
INTEGATED STUDY Problems Solutions OLD WATERFLOOD
CROSS FLOW BETWEEN ZONES NO FRACTURE STIMULATIONS BHP DISCREPANCIES LOW PERMEABILLLTY WHERE DID THE OIL COME FROM AND WHERE DID THE WATER GO? OPEN HOLES / CASED HOLES GEOLOGICAL MODEL 3D SEISMIC / INVERSION MODELING FLOW MODELING HISTORY MATCH SIMULATION TESTING, WELL WORK, MONITORING
11
Discovered 1939 40 Acre spacing Nitro Open Holes Waterflood 20 Acres Laguna DOE Oxy
13
Reservoir Characterization
San Andres Reservoir – Over Estimates and Under Achievement Barriers to vertical flow Inversion Modeling to porosity maps Seismic Velocity related to Neutron Density Porosity
14
Porosity vs. Permeability
16
Seismic Inversion Modeling
18
Porosity - Inversion vs. log
Seismic Inversion Well Log
19
Well Testing Water Chemistry Bottom Hole Pressure Test results
Inefficient sweep Backup for well testing & workover results Carryover and Makeup water Bottom Hole Pressure Test results Complex layering of reservoir Cross flow Low permeability = Longer test duration Production tests 3 day minimum
20
HC03 S04 CL CA MG NA TDS UPPER GRAYBURG 170 2990 13500 1530 450
HC03 S04 CL CA MG NA TDS UPPER GRAYBURG 170 2990 13500 1530 450 7750 26390 LOWER GRAYBURG 386 2632 20295 1889 664 11245 37332 SAN ANDRES 980 3881 33846 2507 762 19855 61831 INJECTION WATER 793 3100 32000 2646 947 17757 57244 CANYON 329 1104 76532 5880 692 42193 126693 ELLENBURGER 439 1459 63917 3840 972 36064 106691
24
History Match 1939 Discovery 1961 Waterflood
25
Acre Infill 1996 Simulation
26
BOTTOM HOLE PRESSURE TESTING AND THE IMPACT OF PERMEABILITY ON PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
27
Upper Grayburg wells 1320’ apart
2124 # 544 # 1534 # 955 #
28
Dual Zone Test
29
After CIBP
30
Same Well After Re-frac
31
Recompletions/Workovers
1955 to 1982 Fracture Stimulation are closed, healed or scaled over Acid Stimulations unsuccessful in contacting reservoir Success rate can be estimated and candidates ranked by Bottom Hole Pressure, Water Chemistry and Production Tests
32
Brock Lease Workover Results
Well Work Date $$ BOPD MCFPD BWPD BR #5 Re-Frac 8/98 58.5 6 1 Post-Frac 72 10 200 6/02 13 3 71 BR#6 68.6 9 38 220 2 62 BR#7 77.2 5 44 242 15 178
33
Production Outcome of fracture stimulation is proportional to bottom hole pressure and Oil/Water production rates prior to treatment Flowing water recoveries do not condemn a well. Some wells produce many times load and have to have fluid level drop below 1000’ from surface before producing OIL!
34
Bottom Line
35
$ucce$$ful Project? PRODUCTION BEFORE WELL WORK (UPPER GRAYBURG ONLY) BO, 9 MCF, 181 BW INITIAL PRODUCTION AFTER WORK BO, 145 MCF, 3167 BW CURRENT PRODUCTION RATE BO, 65 MCF, 2323 BW
36
Acknowledgements Dick Weinbrandt Bill Robinson DOE Tulsa office
The Staff of Laguna Petroleum Baker-Hughes (previously Scientific Software Intercorp) Paul Laverty
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.