1. JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEM (JUSTIS) Case Study Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC) and Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA) of the District of Columbia Present JUSTIS Case Study Jointly Presented By: Timothy Barnes– Enterprise Director at CSOSA Richard Catalon – IT Liaison Officer at CJCC

2. 2 Agenda Overview of CJCC Overview of JUSTIS Overview of CSOSA Case Study – How CSOSA participates in Data Sharing –Goal –Objectives –Solution –Security & Privacy –Benefits Next Steps Questions and Answers

3. 3 The D.C. Appropriations Act, 2000 (P.L. 106-113, 113 Stat.1501,1532 (1999) mandated that the US Government Accounting Office (GAO) study and report on the DC criminal justice system In March 2001 the GAO released the report, entitled DC Criminal Justice System, Better Coordination Needed Among Participating Agencies, which recommended the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council as a necessary venue for the District's criminal justice agencies to identify and address interagency public safety issues CJCC History

4. In 2001, the DC Council implemented this recommendation by enacting DC Code §22-4232 which created the CJCC as an independent agency of the District of Columbia. The statute designated the Mayor as the chair of the CJCC and listed the agencies under the District Government that should participate Congress passed legislation (PL 107-180) the following year authorizing a federal payment and authorizing the heads of federal agencies to participate as members CJCC History Contd..

5. 5 CJCC is dedicated to continually improving the administration and execution of public safety and criminal justice in the District of Columbia. The agency provides a federal/district partnership, which is united in resolving concerns of our citizens about crime and justice. Who is CJCC?

6. 6 CJCC MISSION The mission of the CJCC is to serve as the forum for identifying issues and their solutions, proposing actions, and facilitating cooperation that will improve public safety and the related criminal and juvenile justice services for District of Columbia residents, visitors, victims, and offenders.

7. 7 Participating Agencies FEDERAL AGENCIES D.C. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency ( CSOSA ) U.S. Probation Office ( USPO ) U.S. Attorney’s Office ( USAO ) High Intensity Drug Trafficking Agency ( HIDTA ) U.S. Parole Commission ( USPC ) U.S. Secret Service ( USSS ) U.S. Capitol Police ( USCP ) U.S. Marshals Service ( USMS ) U.S. Alcohol and Tobacco and Firearms ( ATF ) D.C. Office of Unified Communications ( OUC )

8. DISTRICT AGENCIES D.C. Metropolitan Police Department ( MPD ) D.C. Superior Court ( DCSC ) D.C. Pretrial Services Agency ( PSA ) D.C. Office of Attorney General ( OAG ) D.C. Public Defender Service ( PDS ) D.C. Child & Family Services Agency ( CFSA ) D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services ( DYRS ) D.C. Department of Corrections ( DCDC ) Bureau of Election and Ethics ( BEE ) D.C. Department of Motor Vehicles ( DMV ) Participating Agencies Contd..

9. 9 A joint, regional project of local, and federal law enforcement agencies to share criminal justice data across and within the region. JUSTICE Information System (JUSTIS) of the District of Columbia Increase crime fighting capabilities that support defense of our communities and the Homeland. JUSTIS Overview

10. 10 JUSTIS Overview Contd.. A common interface to retrieve information securely from various agencies Provides search capabilities with sub second responses One stop solution – Agencies now have a one stop solution to view information and data from various Criminal Information Systems Intuitive interface satisfying performance, visual, security, data, privacy, and information requirements

11. 11 Provide Infrastructure to securely transfer information between agencies to support business processes A way to promote system integration and information sharing at an “ enterprise ” level A mechanism to implement inter-agency relationships and processes A way to align business processes and services with IT infrastructure and services Interfaces= n(n-1) Interfaces= 2n Justice Integ. Layer Source: US Department of Homeland Security… it.ojp.gov JUSTIS Overview Contd..

12. 12 JUSTIS Results Availability of information from multiple disparate systems in seconds Criminal justice practitioners can make faster and better informed decisions For example, Police Officer and Detectives have multiple mug shots available to see how the offender’s appearance has evolved over time Provides immediate capabilities for: – Tactical – Line Officer – Investigative – Detective – Analytical – Crime Analysts

13. 13 Easy plug-n-play interface for agencies to contribute and share data, thereby substantially reducing local implementation costs and improving the value of your Tax Dollars Standards based implementation (GJXDM, NIEM, SOA) resulting in long term viability of solution and easy integration at regional and national level Utilizes existing agencies’ systems and infrastructure 2007 Excellence.Gov Award by American Council of Technology JUSTIS Results Contd..

14. 14 Who is CSOSA? CSOSA is an independent federal agency created by the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 CSOSA has the operational responsibilities for Probation, Parole, and Supervised Release within the District of Columbia

15. 15 CSOSA MISSION The mission of CSOSA is to increase public safety, prevent crime, reduce recidivism, and support the fair administration of justice in close collaboration with the community

16. 16 Case Study CSOSA Data Sharing using Web Services Goal Provide the officers in the field and the rest of the criminal justice practitioners via JUSTIS the most up-to-date information from CSOSA Case Management System (SMART) Objectives Provide the following information / data for an offender Parole, Probation, and Supervised Release information Aliases Home and Employment Address Supervision information

17. 17 Case Study: Objectives Contd.. Mug Shots Release conditions and stay away orders on different cases Build one single reusable secure interface Provide information / data to external partners In near Real Time Encrypted / Securely Using XML and later upgrade it to be NIEM compliant Based on long term Service Oriented Architecture ( SOA )approach

18. 18 Case Study: Solution Develop Secure Web Services (WS) for information sharing WS’s can be discovered through JUSTIS JUSTIS can apply necessary security, content transformation, and content routing services

19. 19 Case Study: Solution Contd..

20. 20 Case Study: Solution Contd..

21. 21 Case Study: Security

22. 22 WS-Security Specification 128 bit AES Data Encryption using Symmetric key 256 Bit Encryption of Symmetric key using Public key of Requesting Agency Encrypted Data and Key passed over to Requesting Agency for Decryption IP Restriction to CJCC Domain Firewalls 128 Bit SSL certificate over HTTP Audit trail of requesting agencies users and data access details Error reporting Validation Module Usage Case Study: Security Contd..

23. 23 Case Study: JUSTIS Screenshot

24. 24 Improves business process efficiency by reducing cost and particularly time to connect applications Increases the feasibility of real time, remote access to core source of information (owner-CSOSA) which provides current information to JUSTIS Makes it easier to change or add partners Provides a fundamental platform to CSOSA to easily integrate its SMART application functionality with other pieces of software/system like JUSTIS Case Study: Benefits

25. 25 CSOSA Next Steps Develop complementary services to automate a key business process Utilize NIEM standard and map exchanges to corresponding Information Exchange Packet Documents (IEPD) Identify additional business practices and processes for information exchange and process automation Deploy Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) to enable enterprise wide SOA

26. 26 JUSTIS Looking Ahead Virginia District of Columbia Maryland

27. 27 Questions / Comments ?