1. NZAA - RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM ON DRIVER INATTENTION, DISTRACTION AND FATIGUE SEPTEMBER 2011 Leo S Mortimer, Manager Safety, Road & Rail Group - Ministry of Transport

2. The role of regulation Various forms of bring about behavioural change The introduction of the cell phone ban as an example When do you regulate? What do you regulate?

3. Objectives – Mobile phones The public policy objective is to reduce the risks caused by driver distraction, particularly those related to the use of hand-held communication devices.

4. Options Publicity campaign to increase driver awareness A comprehensive ban on using a mobile phone while driving Banning the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving Do nothing

5. Over this six year period the social cost associated with these crashes is estimated at $187.9 million YearFatalInjury Total crashes Social cost (2008$, real) 20034465021.7m 20045596431.8m 20057727942.5m 20062939527.0m 200769610238.5m 2008111611726.6m Table 1. Crashes where mobile phone communications device was a contributing factor and social cost

6. Estimated reduction in social cost of mobile phone related crashes (2008$, real terms) Year20102011201220132014 High$9.1m$10.0m$10.9m$11.7m$12.6m Low$7.6m

7. Estimated benefit to cost ratio under different scenarios High benefitLow benefit High cost1.71.3 Low cost3.32.5

8. Consultation 53 submissions discussed the proposal to ban the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving unanimously (at least in principal) in favour of a ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving. banning the “use” of hand-held mobile phones would be difficult to enforce. A number of submitters supported the hands free rather than a total ban While many others said the use of hands-free mobile phones should also be banned. prohibit their use would be costly to businesses and the economy,

9. What was the public saying? Broad public support for the banning of hand- held mobile phones. A NZ Automobile Association poll at that time said 76 percent of its members supported a ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones A recent Research New Zealand poll revealed 86 percent public support for a ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving

10. Casualties in mobile phone crashes Casualties in crashes where 'cell phone' was identified as a contributing factor; (prior to late 2009 other 'communications devices' were also included) (hand held devices are not identified separately) (law forbidding use of hand held devices while driving took effect Nov 2009) YearFatalSeriousMinor 2005101481 2006222101 2007815121 2008124133 200951572 201051573

11. Mobile phone crashes – Crash severity Crashes where ‘mobile phone' was identified as a contributing factor (prior to late 2009 other 'communications devices' were also included) (hand held devices are not identified separately) (national data for causes for non-injury crashes began in 2007) (law forbidding use of hand held devices while driving took effect Nov 2009) YearFatalSeriousMinorNon-injury 200571162 200622077 200761585223 200812296218 200951363174 201051350129

12. Questions Leo S Mortimer Manager Safety - Road & Rail Group Ministry of Transport L.mortimer@transport.govt.nz