Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance."— Presentation transcript:

1 10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance

2 Background Various forms of surveillance addressed in case law (e.g. electronic communication, surveillance of public spaces, data retention); Infringement of variety of human rights, in particular The right to freedom of expression; The right to privacy (private life); The right to effective remedy; Lack of large scale judicial challenges – no class action, cases brought For the review of the constitutionality/lawfulness of the legislation; or By human rights activists; or Within specific issue in criminal cases.

3 Developments at regional courts European Court of Human Rights (Council of Europe) Riina vs Italy (App. No. 43575/09, 11 March 2014) – video surveillance; Dragojevic vs Croatia (App. No. 68955/11, 15 January 2015) - lawfulness of surveillance; Pending cases Zakharov vs Russia (App. No. 47143/06, hearing in 2014); Big Brother Watch & Others vs the UK(App. no. 58170/13, communicated to the UK in 2014); European Court of Justice (the EU) Digital Rights Ireland vs Ireland (Joint Cases C-293/12 & C-594/12, 8 April 2014) – Data Retention Direction unlawful.

4 Developments in national courts Austria – The Constitutional Court - Case 47/2012 of 27 June 2014 - on statutory provisions on data retention; South Korea: The South Korean National Human Rights Commission - decision of 8April 2014 - on the lack of prior judicial authorization for access to the collected data; The United Kingdom: The Investigatory Powers Tribunal – decision from 6 February 2015 in the case of Liberty vs GCHQ – on regulations covering access by the UK intelligence agency to emails and phone records intercepted by the NSA

5 Cases to watch Pakistan: Bytes for All vs the Federation of Pakistan and others – against the use of FinFisher Command and Control Server on the network of Pakistan Telecommunications Company Ltd and suspected digital surveillance targeting human rights defenders, NGOs and population at large; Ethiopia: Kidane vs Ethiopia, launched in February 2014, in Federal Court in Washington, DC – challenging the Ethiopian government use of secret spyware (FinSpy); Venezuela: Omar Silva vs Public Prosecutor of San Cristobal – launched in October 2014, challenge by human rights attorney for being target by the intelligence agencies for his human rights work.


Download ppt "10 March 2015 Barbora Bukovska, ARTICLE 19 Freedom of Expression: Jurisprudential trends Focus on surveillance."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google