Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVictor Warren Modified over 9 years ago
1
Science Policy, Budgets and Politics: What the Future May Hold Michael S. Lubell Chairman, Physics Department CCNY, New York, NY and Director of Public Affairs American Physical Society, Washington, DC BESAC Meeting, December 6, 2004
2
Lessons from the Election The Five Hot Issues Based on Exit Polls TerrorismBush Iraq WarBush/Kerry Economy and JobsBush/Kerry Health CareKerry Moral ValuesBush, Bush, Bush Post Election Issues Poll Results National Security Domestic Issues: Economy, Jobs, Education, Health Moral Values25%!!!
3
Science’s Image Elitist Arrogant Liberal Democrat Out of Touch with Middle America Enemy of the Bush Administration – Cuts Both Ways
4
Science the Enemy of the Bush Administration Kyoto Protocols ABM Treaty Stem Cell Research Evolution vs. Creationism The Union of Concerned Scientists Reports Scientists for Change
5
Building Bridges To the Public More than 85 percent of people polled believe that science is beneficial But only 20 percent people polled name jobs and the economy as a principal benefit Fewer than 10 percent can name any place where research is performed
6
Building Bridges To the White House Repair the damage Speak the language Engage industrial allies Encourage conservative scientists to speak out
7
The Budgetary Challenges Structural deficit (FY04: $413 b unified $575 b on-budget) Historic current accounts deficit ($50 b/mo; 5.6% of GDP) Foreign ownership of federal debt (92% during last 4 yrs) The sinking dollar Entitlement pressures – Social Security & Medicare Tax cuts Iraq war Homeland security
9
Timeline for the FY 2007 Budget Spring 2005: OMB Guidance to Agencies Summer 2005: Agency Planning Sept. 2005: Agency Requests Submitted to OMB Thanksgiving 2005: OMB “Pass Backs” Sent to Agencies Jan. 2006: Presidential Request Finalized Monday, Feb. 6, 2006: Presidential Budget Submitted to Congress April 15, 2006: Budget Resolution Passed by Congress – Or Not! Spring and Summer 2006: 13 Appropriations Bills Passed by House Spring and Summer 2006: 13 Appropriations Bills Passed by Senate Summer 2006: 13 Appropriations Bills Conferenced Sept. 30, 2006: 13 Appropriations Bills Passed and Signed into Law Oct. 1, 2006: Start of FY 2007
12
The Inside Story of the FY 05 Budget DOE Champions: Hobson, Visclosky, Biggert, Domenici, Reid, Alexander, Bingaman The NSF Squeeze: Veterans and Moon- Mars Evils and Benefits of an Omnibus Bill
15
Science Messages Economic Growth and Jobs Competitiveness National Security Health Care High Tech Workforce
16
Benchmarking the Future Patents High-Tech Industry Output R & D Spending Publications Student Enrollments
21
Physics Review Submissions
22
Graduate Students in Engineering, Physical Sciences, Math & Computer Sciences in U.S. Institutions
23
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 1955196019651975198519951970198019902000 Students and Federal Funding Federal R&D, $M, Non-Biomed (Constant 1996 Dollars) Bachelor’s Degrees in Physical Sciences, Math and Engineering Year Budget Data: Table D in National Patterns of Research and Development Resources: 2000 Data Update (NSF Pub 01-309), National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. Also, the NIH Almanac (NIH Pub. 01-5), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 2001. Student Data: Science and Engineering Degrees 1966-1998 (NSF Pub 01-325), National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2001. Pre-1966 data: Science and Engineering Degrees: 1950-80. A Source Book. Special Edition. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 1982. Dollars Students Mayo, Bruggeman, and Sargent (2002)
24
What can we do? Engage the public – all elements Get political – both parties Use our power in numbers — we’re very large
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.