1. Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Texas March 2015

2. Notice This presentation contains interactive graphics which should be viewed in the context of a powerpoint presentation. Viewing presentation as static slides will cause some data to be hidden from the viewer and may cause labels to appear with the wrong graph. 2

3. Impact Research Questions This impact study answers the following questions: How does the academic progress of charter school students compare to their traditional public school (TPS) counterparts in Texas? We examine: Total average academic growth for all charter students relative to TPS Average academic growth for charter school students for separate time periods Charter school student growth by elementary / middle / high school grade levels Charter school student growth by prior year academic achievement Charter school student growth by the major student subgroups Charter school student growth by the number of years student continuously attended charter schools For the group of charter schools in Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio, how do they perform compared to their peer schools in the same community? 3

4. A Quick Word About Methods Charter school students may be different than a typical student in TPS, so care is needed in testing their learning gains. We use a “Virtual Twin” approach to match each charter school’s students to TPS students who look just like them drawn from the TPS schools that have lost students to the charter school. A Technical Appendix provides a full explanation of our research methodology.Technical Appendix 4

5. A Quick Word About Methods Unlike other recent CREDO studies, this study does not include a conversion of effect sizes to days of learning. As the days of learning computation is based on the national NAEP scores, it would not be appropriate to apply it to the limited regional samples which almost certainly DO NOT progress at the same rate as the national population. 5

6. 6 Understanding the Slides A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN U RBAN R EGION – Average TPS Growth There are two growth values for reading. The left is for TPS students and the right for Charter students There are also two growth values for math. As before, the left is for TPS students and the right for Charter students This graph looks at the difference between the charter and TPS growth values. 0.03 – 0.08 - 0.05 -0.01 – 0.05 - 0.06 These are the marginal effects of charter enrollment. The left is for reading and the right for math. To compute the difference, we take the Charter growth value minus the TPS growth value for each subject.

7. AUSTIN Results 7

8. 8 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth

9. 9 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL STUDENTS BY G ROWTH P ERIOD Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

10. 10 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL STUDENTS BY G RADESPAN Average Elementary TPS Growth Student-Level Results

11. 11 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL STUDENTS BY Y EARS OF C HARTER S CHOOL E NROLLMENT This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after 2006-2007. Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

12. 12 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth

13. 13 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average Asian TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

14. 14 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Austin Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.

15. 15 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average Black TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

16. 16 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average Hispanic TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

17. 17 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average TPS in Poverty Growth Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth

18. 18 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL BLACK STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White, Non- Poverty TPS Growth Student-Level Results

19. 19 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White Non- Poverty TPS Growth Student-Level Results

20. 20 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average ELL TPS Growth Average Non-ELL TPS Growth

21. 21 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average SPED TPS Growth Average Non-SPED TPS Growth

22. 22 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN A USTIN – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Retained TPS Growth Average Non- Retained TPS Growth

23. DALLAS Results 23

24. 24 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth

25. 25 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL STUDENTS BY G ROWTH P ERIOD Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

26. 26 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL STUDENTS BY G RADESPAN Average Elementary TPS Growth Student-Level Results

27. 27 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL STUDENTS BY Y EARS OF C HARTER S CHOOL E NROLLMENT This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after 2006-2007. Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

28. 28 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth

29. 29 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average Asian TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

30. 30 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average Native American TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

31. 31 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average Black TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

32. 32 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average Hispanic TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

33. 33 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average TPS in Poverty Growth Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth

34. 34 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL BLACK STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White, Non- Poverty TPS Growth Student-Level Results

35. 35 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White Non- Poverty TPS Growth Student-Level Results

36. 36 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average ELL TPS Growth Average Non-ELL TPS Growth

37. 37 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average SPED TPS Growth Average Non-SPED TPS Growth

38. 38 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN D ALLAS – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Retained TPS Growth Average Non- Retained TPS Growth

39. EL PASO Results 39

40. 40 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth

41. 41 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL STUDENTS BY G ROWTH P ERIOD Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

42. 42 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL STUDENTS BY G RADESPAN Student-Level Results Average Elementary TPS Growth

43. 43 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL STUDENTS BY Y EARS OF C HARTER S CHOOL E NROLLMENT This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after 2006-2007. Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

44. 44 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth

45. 45 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average Asian TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

46. 46 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average Native American TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough El Paso Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.

47. 47 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average Black TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

48. 48 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average Hispanic TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

49. 49 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average TPS in Poverty Growth Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth

50. 50 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL BLACK STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White, Non- Poverty TPS Growth Student-Level Results

51. 51 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White Non- Poverty TPS Growth

52. 52 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average ELL TPS Growth Average Non-ELL TPS Growth

53. 53 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average SPED TPS Growth Average Non-SPED TPS Growth

54. 54 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN E L P ASO – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Retained TPS Growth Average Non- Retained TPS Growth

55. FORT WORTH Results 55

56. 56 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth

57. 57 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL STUDENTS BY G ROWTH P ERIOD Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

58. 58 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL STUDENTS BY G RADESPAN Average Elementary TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Fort Worth Middle School students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size. Student-Level Results

59. 59 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL STUDENTS BY Y EARS OF C HARTER S CHOOL E NROLLMENT This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after 2006-2007. Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

60. 60 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth

61. 61 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average Asian TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

62. 62 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average Native American TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Fort Worth Native American students in Math to compute an effect size.

63. 63 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average Black TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

64. 64 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average Hispanic TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

65. 65 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average TPS in Poverty Growth Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth

66. Student-Level Results 66 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL BLACK STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White, Non- Poverty TPS Growth

67. Student-Level Results 67 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White Non- Poverty TPS Growth

68. 68 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth

69. 69 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average SPED TPS Growth Average Non-SPED TPS Growth

70. 70 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN F ORT W ORTH – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Retained TPS Growth Average Non- Retained TPS Growth

71. HOUSTON Results 71

72. 72 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth

73. Student-Level Results 73 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL STUDENTS BY G ROWTH P ERIOD Average TPS Growth

74. Student-Level Results 74 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL STUDENTS BY G RADESPAN Average Elementary TPS Growth

75. Student-Level Results 75 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL STUDENTS BY Y EARS OF C HARTER S CHOOL E NROLLMENT This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after 2006-2007. Average TPS Growth

76. 76 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth

77. 77 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average Asian TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

78. 78 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average Native American TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

79. 79 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average Black TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

80. 80 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average Hispanic TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

81. 81 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average TPS in Poverty Growth Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth

82. Student-Level Results 82 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL BLACK STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White, Non- Poverty TPS Growth

83. Student-Level Results 83 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White Non- Poverty TPS Growth

84. 84 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average ELL TPS Growth Average Non-ELL TPS Growth

85. 85 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average SPED TPS Growth Average Non-SPED TPS Growth

86. 86 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN H OUSTON – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Retained TPS Growth Average Non- Retained TPS Growth

87. SAN ANTONIO Results 87

88. 88 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth

89. 89 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL STUDENTS BY G ROWTH P ERIOD Average TPS Growth Student-Level Results

90. 90 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL STUDENTS BY G RADESPAN Average Elementary TPS Growth Student-Level Results

91. 91 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL STUDENTS BY Y EARS OF C HARTER S CHOOL E NROLLMENT This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after 2006-2007. Student-Level Results Average TPS Growth

92. 92 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth

93. 93 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average Asian TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

94. 94 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average Native American TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

95. 95 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average Black TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

96. 96 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average Hispanic TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth

97. 97 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average TPS in Poverty Growth Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth

98. 98 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL BLACK STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White, Non- Poverty TPS Growth Student-Level Results

99. 99 A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS IN POVERTY Average White Non- Poverty TPS Growth Student-Level Results

100. 100 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average ELL TPS Growth Average Non-ELL TPS Growth

101. 101 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average SPED TPS Growth Average Non-SPED TPS Growth

102. 102 Student-Level Results A VERAGE A CADEMIC G ROWTH FOR C HARTER S CHOOL STUDENTS RELATIVE TO PERFORMANCE OF V IRTUAL T WINS IN T RADITIONAL P UBLIC S CHOOLS IN S AN A NTONIO – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Retained TPS Growth Average Non- Retained TPS Growth