Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGyles French Modified over 9 years ago
1
Disability ranking of US workers employed in 206 occupations: The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 1986-1994 DJ Lee, LE Fleming, W LeBlanc, O Gómez-Marín, AJ Caban, T Pitman (University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136) Funding provided in part by NIOSH Grant number R01 0H03915; http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/groups/niehs/niosh/ INTRODUCTION Studies examining the disability status of selected worker groups such as nurses and postal workers have been published, but a study comparing the disability status of the major working groups in the US has never been undertaken. METHODS The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is a multipurpose household survey of the US civilian non-institutionalized population conducted yearly since 1957. Between 1986 and 1994, over 450,000 US workers, age > 18 years, participated in the NHIS. 1 A series of multivariate logistic regression analyses controlling for survey design, age, gender, race, ethnicity, and educational status compared workers in each occupational group to the remaining employed workforce on the following dichotomous dependent variables: = 4 days of restricted activity in the previous two weeks; 0 vs. >= 1 days of bed rest in the previous two weeks; 0 vs. >= 1 days of missed work in the previous 2 weeks due to illness or injury; = 4 doctor visits in the previous 12 months; 0 vs. >= 1 days spent in a hospital in the previous 12 months; 0 vs. >= 1 reported health conditions; and excellent, very good or good vs. fair or poor reported health status. A disability summary score was created by taking a weighted average of the survey- adjusted multivariate odds ratios for these seven measures. 2, 3 RESULTS The 15 occupational groups reporting the greatest disability included social workers, inspectors, postal clerks, psychologists, grinding machine operators (Table 1). The 15 occupational groups reporting the least disability included dentists, pilots, physicians, pharmacists, and dieticians (Table 2). Conclusions These findings aid in the identification of worker groups that require increased attention for disability research and prevention by the occupational health community. Some of these occupations, such as the nursing professions, have been studied fairly extensively with respect to job-specific tasks thought to increase the risk of disability (e.g., back strain due to lifting). Social workers and psychologists occupied the #1 and #4 rankings, respectively. Since these are both sedentary jobs, research into potential occupational stress-related factors influencing the health of these professions is needed. 4-7 The “low-risk” occupations identified in the present analysis, may have been identified as such due, in part, to a healthy worker effect (e.g., pilots). Nevertheless, study of selected professions, may identify job or worker characteristics which may be protective and which could be adopted for use in high-risk worker groups. 8 References 1. Massey J. Design and estimation for the NHIS 1985-94. Vital & Health Statistics Series #2. 1989 2.RTI. Software for survey data analysis (SUDDAN) release 8.0.0. 2001 3.Botman SL, Jack SS. Combining national health interview survey datasets: Issues and approaches. Stat Med. 1995;14:669-677 4.Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 5.Lonne RL. Social workers and human service providers. In: Dollard MF, Winefield T, Winefield HR, eds. Occupational stress in the service professions. London: CRC Press; 2003:281-309. 6.Griffiths SP. Stress in psychological work. In: Dollard MF, Winefield T, Winefield HR, eds. Occupational stress in the service professions. London: CRC Press; 2003:359-388. 7.Lloyd C, King R, Chenoweth L. Social work, stress and burnout: A review. Journal of Mental Health. 2002;11:255-265 8.Nelson DL, Simmons BL. Health psychology and work stress: A more positive approach. In: Quick JC, Tetrick LE, eds. Handbook of occupational health psychology. Washington, D.C.: APA Books; 2003:97-119. The 15 Occupations with the Greatest Reported Disability Following Adjustment for Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Educational Status: the 1986- 1994 National Health Interview Survey Ranking Census Occupational CodeOccupation Weighted Sum of the Odds Ratios AFD1 OR AFD2 OR AFD3 OR CFD1 OR CFD2 OR HS1 OR HS2 OR 1174Social workers1.421.401.461.531.441.281.401.42 2689Inspectors, testers, and graders1.391.511.491.431.571.161.491.26 3354Postal clerks, except mail carriers1.321.441.621.661.480.921.111.30 4167Psychologists1.301.181.141.111.621.240.991.37 5709 Grinding/abrading/buffing/polishing machine operators1.281.341.051.381.341.421.391.22 6447 Nursing aides, orderlies, and attendants1.281.471.391.571.071.391.461.25 7547Specified mechanics and repairers1.231.261.321.381.171.151.401.20 836 Inspectors/compliance officers, except construction1.231.261.271.411.321.300.991.16 9424Correctional institution officers1.221.451.151.491.261.311.041.13 10207Licensed practical nurses1.221.321.411.580.991.581.311.22 11706 Punching and stamping press machine operators1.211.131.071.31 1.460.991.23 12355Mail carriers, postal service1.211.341.171.561.301.100.811.25 13187Actors and directors1.201.271.231.111.350.841.121.19 14426 Guards and police, except public service1.191.021.011.021.351.251.361.21 15378Bill and account collectors1.191.471.691.831.061.781.161.12 AFD1 = 0 vs = 1 Restricted Activity Days in Prior 2 Wks AFD2 = 0 vs = 1 Bed Days in Prior 2 Wks AFD3 = 0 vs = 1 Lost Work Days in Prior 2 Wks CFD1 = 0-3 vs = 4 Doctor Visits in Prior 12 months CFD2 = 0 vs = 1 Hospitalizations in Prior 12 months HS1 = 0 if Health Self-rated Excellent or Good vs = 1 if Health Self-rated Fair or Poor HS2 = 0 vs = 1 Health Condition reported The 15 Occupations with the Least Reported Disability Following Adjustment for Age, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Educational Status: the 1986- 1994 National Health Interview Survey Ranking Census Occupational CodeOccupation Weighted Sum of the Odds Ratios AFD1 OR AFD2 OR AFD3 OR CFD1 OR CFD2 OR HS1 OR HS2 OR 192744 Textile sewing machine operators0.820.790.700.800.830.971.110.79 193514 Automobile body and related repairers0.810.961.040.900.680.931.030.78 194573Drywall installers0.791.000.921.080.640.571.110.83 195383Bank tellers0.790.840.88 0.850.890.640.74 196269Sales workers, parts0.790.800.750.940.800.820.730.77 197634Tool and die makers0.780.610.480.551.091.080.680.91 198275Sales counter clerks0.770.790.870.750.760.800.860.75 199264Sales workers, apparel0.770.830.970.790.730.700.870.76 200479Farm workers0.750.670.630.680.670.981.160.80 201806Driver-sales workers0.740.670.440.460.831.201.130.83 20297Dietitians0.740.840.730.690.950.460.600.72 20396Pharmacists0.720.800.780.710.580.691.020.78 20484Physicians0.680.700.570.560.570.930.640.77 205226Airplane pilots and navigators0.610.730.540.740.630.440.370.65 20685Dentists0.530.390.35 0.580.730.350.65 AFD1 = 0 vs = 1 Restricted Activity Days in Prior 2 Wks AFD2 = 0 vs = 1 Bed Days in Prior 2 Wks AFD3 = 0 vs = 1 Lost Work Days in Prior 2 Wks CFD1 = 0-3 vs = 4 Doctor Visits in Prior 12 months CFD2 = 0 vs = 1 Hospitalizations in Prior 12 months HS1 = 0 if Health Self-rated Excellent or Good vs = 1 if Health Self-rated Fair or Poor HS2 = 0 vs = 1 Health Condition reported
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.