Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner of Accountability, Partnership and Assistance and Jesse Dixon Office of District and School Turnaround MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE)

2 2 Massachusetts Context 391 School Districts, 1800 schools Strong Teacher Unions Standards-Based Accountability since 1993 2008 – Redesigned System for Accountability and Assistance

3 3 Massachusetts Context 35 Lowest-performing schools (Level 4 Schools) Across 9 Urban Districts (18,000 students) 9 in 10 are eligible for F/R lunch (89%) 1 in 4 is an English-language learner (26%) 1 in 5 is a student with disability (21%)

4 4 Core Ideas for State Redesign The district, not school, is ESE’s entry point Accountability is essential, but not sufficient

5 5 Theory of Action: Building District Capacity If ESE can assist districts to intervene successfully in their lowest-performing schools, then districts will have the capacity to intervene successfully in their other low-performing schools.

6 6 SIG Monitoring: Beyond Compliance 1.Required by USED 2.Build district capacity to: monitor the implementation of turnaround initiatives use ongoing data from self-monitoring and external site visits to continually refine the strategies 3.Use data to differentiate ESE targeted assistance to districts 4.Discontinue investments with low likelihood of success 5.Identify schools where stronger state intervention may be necessary

7 7 Key Features of ESE SIG Monitoring September August FebruaryMay Implementation Benchmarks Monitoring (ESE) Monitoring Site Visits (consultants) LEA Renewal Application (ESE) Measurable Annual Goals (performance)

8 8 Implementation Benchmarks Monitoring ESE measures implementation progress through district- defined implementation benchmarks Benchmarks must distinguish between: Strategies (e.g., policy change, PD planned, new staffing) Technical Benchmarks – technical aspects of the strategy implemented by timeline (e.g., PD happened, new staff hired, new schedule is in place) Early Evidence of Change – evidence that the strategies are making an impact in actions or beliefs (e.g., classroom observations report 80% of staff now incorporating new strategies in instruction) Short-term Impacts (assessments, perception data, attendance) Long-term goals (student outcomes through MAGs)

9 9 Monitoring Site Visits External site visits to every SIG grantee in late winter/early spring (contract through Schoolworks) Data from documents, classroom observations, focus groups Assesses the implementation of benchmarks in the following areas: Effective school leadership Aligned curriculum Effective instruction Assessment, tiered instruction and adequate learning time Student social, emotional, and health needs Feedback produced in a report and a half-day feedback/planning session with the district/school leaders

10 10 Annual Renewal Process SIG grantees are not guaranteed funding for three years Renewal application includes: Early evidence of change Implementation benchmarks progress Overall what worked? How do you know? What changes are being made and why? (reference site visit and benchmarks data) Changes to budget

11 11 Measurable Annual Goals MCAS Performance – school-specific targets based on an analysis of what’s “rigorous but realistic”: school-wide and by subgroup Other Indicators Attendance Graduation/Dropout rates Out of school suspension rates School climate etc.

12 12 ESE Goals for Monitoring 1.Build district capacity to: monitor the implementation of turnaround initiatives use ongoing data from self-monitoring and external site visits to continually refine the strategies 2.Use data to differentiate ESE targeted assistance to districts 3.Discontinue investments with low likelihood of success 4.Identify schools where stronger state intervention may be necessary

13 13 For More Information Level 4 Schools website http://www.doe.mass.edu/sda/framework/level4/ School Redesign Grant (SIG) website http://www.doe.mass.edu/redesign/ Jesse Dixon - jdixon@doe.mass.edu


Download ppt "1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google