Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNorman Tucker Modified over 9 years ago
1
DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009
2
2 AGENDA Child Welfare Trends & Outcomes Safety Resources CFSR Outcomes OFI Trends & Outcomes Analysis of Decreasing TANF Child Only Cases
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6 REPORT DISPOSTIONS March 2008, September 2008 & March 2009 Total Reports March 2008=7,791 September 2008=8,115 March 2009=7,751
7
7 INVESTIGATIONS Total Investigations March 2008=2,794 September 2008=2,876 March 2009=2,371 Decrease in percentage of reports investigated in March 2009 but higher percentage substantiated. Unsubstantiated and opened have been excluded from this graph.
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS IN SAFETY RESOURCES
47
47
48
48 AVERAGE DAYS IN SAFETY RESOURCES BY REGION January & February 2009* Several regions indicated that judges are ordering safety resource placements for children. * As reflected in SHINES
49
49
50
50 Item 3: Services to Family to Protect Children in Home and Prevent Removal or Re-entry Into Foster Care May 2008 – April 2009
51
51 Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry Into FC Determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to provide services to the family to prevent children’s entry into foster care or re-entry after a reunification.
52
52 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry 739 of 143279.30%304 of 57778.95%
53
53 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry(FPS Only) 401 of 40175.56%173 of 17374.57% Item 3: Services to Family to Prevent Removal or Re-Entry(Plc/ Adopt Only) 90 of 64587.78%25 of 23284.00%
54
54 78.90% PIP Goal
55
55 Review Findings for Item 3 Lack of follow up with identified services to prevent removal and reduce risk. When parents were non compliant with services, documentation did not support the state’s efforts to secure court intervention. Delays in initiating services to the family. Safety and risk assessments are tools and not activities or services to prevent removal. Safety plans are not being monitored.
56
56 Safety Resources May 2008 – April 2009
57
57 Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 # of Cases W/SR Assessed Timely/ Appropriate Average Days in SR # of Cases W/SR Assessed Timely/ Appropriate Average Days in SR 21052%1357755%136 Safety Resources
58
58 FFY 2009 To-Date: October 2008 – April 2009 Regions 13 (Fulton) and 14 (Dekalb) do not include PLC/Adopt. Cases Region # of Cases With SR Assessed Timely/ Appropriate Average Days in SR 41644%103 51771%130 61553%183 81258%146 13540%96 14650%128 15650%142 Safety Resources
59
59 Review Findings for Safety Resources Screenings not completed on all household members in the safety resource home. Assessments not completed in required timeframe. Lack of follow up with children in safety resources. Lack of contacts and service provision with parents to reduce risk so children can return home. This trend could have a negative impact on the IV-E eligibility of children who may later enter foster care.
60
60 Other Issue: Utilize safety resource tab in SHINES by entering safety resource in a timely manner. Assessments in SHINES in the contacts/summaries section would not be captured as safety resource case. Accuracy of start and end date in SHINES.
61
PERMANENCY FOR CHILDREN
62
62
63
63
64
64
65
65
66
66
67
67
68
68
69
69
70
70
71
71
72
72
73
73
74
74
75
75
76
76
77
77
78
78
79
79
80
80
81
81
82
82
83
83
84
84
85
85 CFSR Georgia’s Program Improvement Plan
86
86 Georgia’s Program Improvement Plan 5 Strategies 111 Action Steps 26% of the Action steps (29) requested to be marked completed
87
87 Georgia’s Program Improvement Plan Nine Statewide Items Measured for Improvement Items 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 17,18, 19, 20 Two Kenny A measures for Fulton and DeKalb Outcome 24 Outcome 27 Four FORG Measures for Fulton and DeKalb Items 17, 18, 19, 20 Two Composite scores for the state from NCANDS and AFCARS Safety Composite 2 Abuse in Foster Homes Permanency Composite 2 Adoptions
88
88 ItemPeas Baseline data Federal Improve- ment Level Current PEAS as of 03/31/09 Gap 179%81%79.04%1.96% 377%78.9%78.96% 472%73.5%72.72%.78% 744%46.42%46.45% 1074%79.95%77.55%2.40% 1757%58.94%59.38% 1849%51.09%50.64%.44% 1959%60.73%63.04% 2021%23%20.63%2.37%
89
89 Fulton and DeKalb Kenny A Measurements for the PIP Items Baseline Kenny A data Federal Improve -ment Level Current Kenny A performance Gap Outcome 27 for CFSR Item 7 55%58.8%3.8% Outcome 24 for CFSR Item 10 30%33.7%3.7%
90
90 National Standard Neg. level of Improve- ment Current State Score Safety Outcome 2: Absence of child abuse Neglect in foster care 99.6898.6986 98.6 (2008 NCANDS) Permanency 2: Timeliness of adoption 106.4 or higher106.0779 104.8 (03/31/08 07B08A)
91
91 Safety 2 Safety Data: Absence of child abuse/neglect in foster care National Standard FFY 2006FFY 2007FFY 2008 Negotiated Improvement Goal Gap 99.6899.2298.998.698.6986.0986
92
92 Permanency Composite 2 Permanency Outcome 2: Timeliness of adoption National StandardFFY 2006FFY 2007FFY 20078 Negotiated Improvement Goal Gap 106.499.596.6104.8106.0779 1.2779 Items considered : Of children exiting to adoption, % exiting in less than 24 months of current removal date Of children exiting to adoption, median number of months in foster care Of children in care for 17 months or more at the start of the reporting year, % who exit to adoption by the end of the year Of children in care 17months or longer and not legally free for adoption at the start of the reporting year, % who become legally free within 6 months of the start of the year. Of children who are legally free for adoption in the previous year, % adopted in less than 12months of becoming legally free.
93
93 National Standards/Composite Scores Due to the data clean up efforts and the subsequent re-submissions of NCANDS and AFCARS scores (mainly AFCARS) the composite scores are still likely to change as well as the required improvement level. We have re-submitted our AFCARS scores for 08AB and our negotiated levels are subject to change
94
94 Well-being Outcomes II and III Items 21, 22 and 23 May 2008 – April 2009
95
95 Item 21: Educational Needs of the Child Determine whether the agency made concerted efforts to assess children’s educational needs and whether identified needs were appropriately addressed in case planning and case management activities.
96
96 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 21: Educational Needs of the child 639 of 99688.26%232 of 35591.38%
97
97 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 21: Educational Needs of the child (FPS Only) 105 of 35178.10%36 of 12386.11% Item 21: Educational Needs of the child (Plc/ Adopt Only) 534 of 64590.26%196 of 23292.35%
98
98
99
99 Review Findings for Item 21 FFY 2009 – State is currently in substantial conformity for item 21 at 91.38%. Not item in PIP but Goal is 95% for the Outcome. Placement/Adoption cases rated higher than FPS cases.
100
100 Things to consider to improve item 21 Review all assessments and CCFAs to ensure follow up is made. Read recommendations carefully. Document education in SHINES for the children under person detail and youth detail tab. Document on case plan. External documentation.
101
101 Item 22: Physical Health of the Child Determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to address the physical health needs of the child, including dental health needs.
102
102 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 22: Physical Health of the child 781 of 99677.72%279 of 35586.02%
103
103 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 22: Physical Health of the child (FPS Only) 136 of 35173.53%47 of 12378.72% Item 22: Physical Health of the child (Plc/ Adopt Only) 645 of 64578.60%232 of 23287.50%
104
104
105
105 Review Findings for Item 22 Current, age appropriate medical or dental assessments were not documented in case files and there was a lack of follow up when needs were identified. Lack of follow up with dental needs is main issue with this item. Dental exam is required beginning at age 3. Lack of documentation of results of exams. Lack of documentation in SHINES in health detail/health log. Placement/Adoption cases rated higher than FPS cases.
106
106 Item 23: Mental/Behavioral Health of the Child Determine whether, during the period under review, the agency made concerted efforts to address the mental/behavioral health needs of the child(ren).
107
107 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April 2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 23: Mental/ Behavioral Health of the child 632 of 99681.33%227 of 35585.02%
108
108 Performance Indicator Rolling Twelve Months May 2008 - April2009 FFY 2009 To-Date October 2008 – April 2009 Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Number of Applicable Cases Achieved Item 23: Mental/ Behavioral Health of the child (FPS Only) 148 of 35162.84%46 of 12371.74% Item 23: Mental/ Behavioral Health of the child (Plc/ Adopt Only) 484 of 64586.98%181 of 23288.40%
109
109
110
110 Review Findings for Item 23 Mental/behavioral health needs were not assessed or services provided to meet the identified needs. Lack of follow up when counseling was recommended. Lack of follow up/reports from providers. Lack of documentation in health tab/health log in SHINES. Placement/Adoption cases rated higher than FPS.
111
111
112
OFFICE OF FAMILY INDEPENDENCE
113
113
114
114
115
115
116
116
117
117
118
118
119
119
120
120
121
121
122
122
123
123
124
124
125
125
126
Analysis of TANF Child Only Cases
127
127
128
128
129
129
130
130
131
131
132
132 FAMILY INDEPENDENCE QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW PROCESS Reviews are conducted based on the Federal Management Review Process which is based on national trends
133
133 FOOD STAMP PROGRAM POLICY ISSUES Outreach Case Record Review—Initial Certifications, Denied Applications, Terminations, Recertifications (approvals and closures) Customer Service: Application Process, interviews with staff/clients/advocates Hearing Logs
134
134 CORRECTIVE ACTION Quality Improvement Plan/Monitoring Corrective Action Plan Quality Control Data/Central File Error Prone Cases: –Wages and Salaries –Shelter and Utilities
135
135 Claims Management 5667 Log for OIS Referrals Overpayments/Underpayments IPV referrals made/documented timely Disqualified Recipient Subsystem (DRS) entry Sanctions applied timely Agency Error/Inadvertent Household Error claims documented on ADDR NARR screen
136
136 AGENCY COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES Civil Rights/Title VI Limited English Proficiency/Sensory Impaired (LEP/SI) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA/Section 504) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
137
137 IRS/BEERS SECURITY REVIEW Two Barrier Security Destruction Logs Annual Training/Logs/User Agreement Forms UNAX Poster County Security Plan
138
138 Other Review Items TANF Participation Activities/Validation of Hours TANF Mandatory Forms
139
139 Three Months and Six Months Trends Comparison Chart
140
140 Three Months and Six Months Trends Comparison Chart
141
141 Three Months and Six Months Trends Comparison Chart
142
142 Three Months and Six Months Trend Comparison Chart
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.