Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNathan Goodwin Modified over 9 years ago
1
Tariffs © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 1 PowerPoint slides prepared by: Andreea Chiritescu Eastern Illinois University
2
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 2 Tariff revenues as a percentage of government revenues, 2007: selected countries TABLE 4.1 Developing CountriesPercentageIndustrial CountriesPercentage The Bahamas Guinea Ethiopia Ghana Sierra Leone Madagascar Dominican Republic Jordan 51.2 47.9 33.5 28.5 27.6 26.9 20.9 11.3 New Zealand Australia Japan Canada Switzerland United States United Kingdom Iceland 2.6 2.5 1.2 1.1 1.0
3
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 3 Selected U.S. tariffs TABLE 4.2
4
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 4 Examples of tariffs, selected countries (in %) TABLE 4.3
5
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 5 The effective rate of protection TABLE 4.4
6
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 6 China’s nominal and effective tariff rates in forestry products, 2001 TABLE 4.5
7
Tariffs often rise significantly with the level of processing (tariff escalation) in many industrial countries. This is especially true for agricultural products. Tariff escalation in industrial countries has the potential of reducing demand for processed imports from developing countries, hampering diversification into higher-value added exports. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 7 Tariff escalation on industrial countries’ imports from developing countries FIGURE 4.1
8
Consumer surplus is the difference between the maximum amount buyers are willing to pay for a given quantity of a good and the amount actually paid. Graphically, consumer surplus is represented by the area under the demand curve and above the good’s market price. Producer surplus is the revenue producers receive over and above the minimum necessary for production. Graphically, producer surplus is the area above the supply curve and below the good’s market price. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 8 Consumer surplus and producer surplus FIGURE 4.2
9
For a small nation, a tariff placed on an imported product is shifted totally to the domestic consumer via a higher product price. Consumer surplus falls as a result of the price increase. The small nation’s welfare decreases by an amount equal to the protective effect and consumption effect, the so-called deadweight losses due to a tariff. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 9 Tariff trade and welfare effects: small nation model FIGURE 4.3
10
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 10 Creeping protectionism during global economic downturn of 2008–2009: number of protectionist measures initiated* TABLE 4.6
11
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 11 Effects of increases in U.S. tariffs on the world price of imported goods TABLE 4.7
12
For a large nation, a tariff on an imported product may be partially shifted to the domestic consumer via a higher product price and partially absorbed by the foreign exporter via a lower export price. The extent by which a tariff is absorbed by the foreign exporter constitutes a welfare gain for the home country. This gain offsets some (all) of the deadweight welfare losses due to the tariff’s consumption and protective effects. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 12 Tariff trade and welfare effects: large nation model FIGURE 4.4
13
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 13 Economic welfare gains from liberalization of significant import restraints*, 2005 (millions of dollars) TABLE 4.8 Annual change in Economic WelfareImport-Competing Industry Textiles and apparel Sugar Dairy Footwear Ethyl alcohol Beef Tuna Glass products Tobacco $1,885 millions 811 573 249 120 48 24 20 19 *Import tariffs, tariff-rate quotas, and import quotas
14
A tariff placed on imported steel increases the costs of a steel-using manufacturer. This increase leads to a higher price charged by the manufacturer and a loss of international competitiveness. © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 14 How an import tariff burdens domestic exporters FIGURE 4.5
15
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 15 President Bush’s steel trade remedy program of 2002–2003: selected products TABLE 4.9
16
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 16 U.S. tariffs are high on cheap goods, low on luxuries TABLE 4.10
17
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 17 Hourly compensation costs in U.S. dollars for production workers in manufacturing, 2007 TABLE 4.11
18
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password‐protected website for classroom use 18 Productivity, wages, and unit labor costs, relative to the U.S.: total manufacturing, 2002 (U.S.= 1.0) TABLE 4.12
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.