Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp."— Presentation transcript:

1 Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 313–341, 2005 4 주차 : 제 1 발제 인지구조 / 발제자 : 최봉환

2 Outline Introduction ACT-R Use of brain imaging The capacity for re-representation: A uniquely human trait?

3 Introduction Overview of ACT-R theory –illustrative application of it to algebra equation solving Algebra equation solving –uniquely human cognitive activity –"what is unique about human cognitive?" Comparing human brain with ACT-R –preliminary mapping ACT-R component to brain  functional fMRI

4 ACT-R Theory ACT-R –Adaptive Control of Thought–Rational = cognitive architecture Theory –for "how human cognition works"

5 ACT-R Architecture Role Input = Problem representation (3x - 5 = 7) Mental representation (3x = 12) Communication, Procedural Control Goal : Strategy decision (unwind stratage) Retrieve Critical Information (7+5=12) Output (x=4) massive parallelism & central bottle neck

6 Algebra equation manipulation Why algebra equation solving problem –substantial complexity –tractably characterized and studied unlike many human accomplishments (cf : Natural language) Problem – –solved by unwind strategy 

7 The ACT–R model General instruction – 

8 The ACT–R model : speedup Speedup –Compilation collapse multiple steps into single step –Reduction of retrieval times subsymbolic learning –instruction strongly encoded during day0 arithmetic fact repeated  major learning happening at the symbolic level –production rules

9 Regions of interest Caudate  procedural prefrontal  retrieval Anterior cingulate  goal Paretal  problem state or imaginal motor  manual

10  Measuring activity –BOLD : blood-oxygen-level-dependent measure neural activity directly have been attempted –profile of activity in modules t = time, s = scales the time, a = determines the shape of BOLD response, m = govern magnitude f(x) = engage function

11 Characterizing the differences among the brain regions

12 Assessing goodness of fit Measure the degree of mismatch against the noise in the data – 

13 토의 제안 인간과 동일한 구조를 모사하는 것의 의미는 ? – 인간과 동일할 필요가 있는가 ? 인간에게 원하는 것과 컴퓨터에게 원하는 것이 다를 것 같은데.. – 인간과 동일한 것을 증명할 필요는 있는가 ? 1+3 = 4 = 2+2=4 라면 내부구조의 의미는 ? 성능은 ? – 간단한 문제라서 잘 풀리는 것이 아닌지 ? – 수학적인 문제 혹은 논리적인 문제에만 적용 가능한 건 아닌지 모호함에 대한 해결책은 ? –ACT-R 은 Deliberative Agent 인듯한데 모호한 정의에 대한 묘사는 어떻게 ? –Goal based Agent 로 구성되어 있는데 목적지는 어떻게 찾을 것인가 ?


Download ppt "Software Agent 인지 구조 John R. Anderson, "Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture," Cognitive Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google