1. USJFCOM Exercise Support Working Group
30 March 2010
COL Dave Paschal
USJFCOM J-7 1

2. USJFCOM Exercise Support Brief-back
Purpose: This Working Group was convened to examine USJFCOM J7 exercise support. An in- depth look at the current year and next year calendar as well as an overarching view of 2-3 years out.
Discussion:
Conducted a month by month review of Joint Warfighting Center (JWFC) Exercise support calendar to resolve dates and support issues
Updated JWFC Deployable Training Team (DTT) support - returning the planning factor to two DTT’s
Caveat - real world operational support takes precedence
January Deconfliction Conference is the starting point for support issue identification
May and August continue to be support challenges at least thru 2013.
AW 11 concept support will to be socialized prior to the next WJTSC
KORCOM support and USPACOM priorities need to be addressed.
Outcomes: Excellent exchange between combatant command representatives concerning priorities and factors influencing JWFC support in their area of responsibility.
Integrated Operations Training: Mission Rehearsal Exercises and combatant command events are Inherently Integrated Operations Training Events
Issues: None
Several support to execution and enhancement briefs where presented for SA
JWFC WNN and OE support / capability,
JLVC status and supporting D/B release,
JWFC self assessment survey tool
J8 JSILL capability

3. Joint Task Force Capable Headquarters Readiness Working Group
30 March 2010
Mr. Dan Abahazy
USJFCOM J-7 3

4. JTF Capable HQ Brief-back
Purpose: Working Group (WG) addressed previously identified functional areas requiring increased training emphasis for Service HQ designated to be JTF capable HQ
Discussion:
Seven areas were identified in previous Working Group meetings: 1) Training for individual augmentees, 2) Training of Boards, Bureaus, Centers, Cells, Working Groups (B2C2WG), 3) Joint Manning Document (JMD) development/management, 4) Deployment planning/TPFDD development, 5) Readiness Reporting Tools, 6) Computer Network Defense, 7) Interagency.
Each of the seven areas were discussed to characterize the scope of the gap
Approaches developed to begin to mitigate gaps for items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6.
Item 5 and 7 were assessed as already identified issues with actions ongoing in other venues
Combination of improving already existing training products and services and developing new products and services will be examined; Joint Knowledge Online (JKO) products and services will be used to extent possible
Need for senior DOD guidance on JTF HQ requirements remains a concern
Outcomes:
Way ahead for above items developed; Command & Control (C2) Capability Portfolio Management JTF HQ Focus Integration Team Training WG will continue to collaborate and address actions.
Integrated Operations Training: Item 7: training with interagency partners is directly related. Existing procedures and initiatives will be leveraged.
Issues: existing issues and addressed in CE2 SLT

5. Joint Knowledge Development and Distribution Capability Stakeholder Meeting
30 March 2010
Mr. Joe Camacho
USJFCOM J-7 5

6. JKDDC Stakeholder Meeting Brief-back
Purpose: Provide Program Updates, propose FY11 Program Goals and Objectives, Review FY11 Stakeholder Requirements, Discuss Emerging Issues and New Business
Discussion:
~100 participants (Combatant commands, Services, USA Training & Doctrine Command (TRADOC), P&R, Combined Staff (CYBERCOM), other Combat support Agencies (CSAs).
Updates on products, metrics, projects
Small Group Scenario Trainer (SGST), Virtual Cultural Awareness Trainer (VCAT), Learning Management system (LMS) prototype demos
J7 Commander’s Intent for FY11 Goals and Objectives validated and vetted
Stakeholder briefs on Joint Knowledge On-Line (JKO) enabled programs
TRADOC demonstration of virtual world progress
Budget, issues and Way Ahead discussions in prep for next stakeholders resource allocation conference
Stakeholders survey collected
Outcomes:
J7 Guidance for FY 11 Goals and Objectives incorporated
Stakeholders satisfied with current status of JKO and understand challenges for the future
Integrated Operations Training: JKO web based training is a demonstrated enabling capability and tool for integrated operations training
Issues: None

7. Joint Training Enterprise
Working Group
30 March 2010
CAPT Bill Kovach
USJFCOM J-7 7

8. Joint Training Enterprise Brief-back
Purpose: To work Enterprise level requirements, activities, and shortfalls focused on improving the Joint Training Environment.
Discussion:
Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) Corporate Board
USJFCOM and Services presented (pre-decisional) POM 12 quads for collaboration and discussion
JNTC Program Director presented program update and received stakeholder approval on FY11 fixed costs
Joint Training Enterprise technical updates
USJFCOM J7 presented status of J7/JNTC programs including Next Gen Joint Training & Experimentation (JTEN), Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Federation, Joint Theater Level Simulation way forward and Cross Domain Information Sharing (CDIS) initiatives.
National Electromagnetic (EM) OPFOR Program Initiative – USSTRATCOM
Joint Unmanned Aerial Systems (JUAS) Collective Training Discussion – JUAS COE
Outcomes: This group is the focal point to collaboratively address issues impacting joint training at Services/Combatant Command venues.
Integrated Operations Training: Highlighted at this meeting were problems associated with Joint ISR and interagency integration.
Issues: N/A
To be filled out by all WG Command Representatives for use in building the AAR and EXSUM for Gen Mattis.

9. Australian, Canadian, Great Britain and United States (ACGU) Working Group
31 March 2010
COL Tom Walrond
USJFCOM J-7 9

10. ACGU Training Integration Brief-back
Purpose: To provide a collaborative forum to enhance ACGU Joint, Combined, and Multilateral training that increase operational capability, preparedness and improve interoperability;
Discussion:
Validated the Joint Training Coordination Program (JTCP) as the means to schedule training
Provided way ahead on ACGU Training Environment Enclave (JTEN)
Continue to engage, socialize and work ‘Enhancement of ACGU Interoperability’ issues
Expand to allow COCOMs to collaborate with ACGU partners and to share activities, synchronize capabilities, and solicit ACGU training participation
Discussed ACGU lessons learned  Diverted to Joint Lessons Learned Working Group
Outcomes: Successfully achieved objectives and desired end state; Refocusing on integrating partner training environments with the Joint Training Environment
Integrated Operations Training: Principal focus now shifts to development and execution of the ACGU Training Environment to increase training opportunities by enhancing interoperability
Issues: Integration of ACGU Partners into the Joint Training Enterprise
To ensure that partners have trained together prior to operating in combat:
1) Execute combined training; 2) develop an integrated training environment that increases training opportunities 10

11. Integration of ACGU Partners into the Joint Training Enterprise
Briefer: Col Walrond
ACGU: Australia, Canada, Great Britain, United States
Issue : The enhancement of ACGU Joint, Combined, Multilateral training in order to increase operational capability, preparedness, and improve interoperability.
Discussion:  No formal procedure exists for scheduling and coordinating ACGU Joint Combined and Multilateral training and use of the full range of Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) training capabilities. An ACGU working group (WG), including Combatant Commands and JS J7, needs to be established to draft agreement(s), develop business rules, and identify/develop the appropriate forum for coordination. The WG will use the PACOM-AUS Joint Combined Training Capability (JCTC) work as a starting point. Formal business rules will require a long term effort, but short term efforts will continue to leverage existing multilateral venues.
Endstate: Defense level policy guidance, and agreements. A formal coordination process, business rules and/or other documents as necessary for ACGU partners and combatant commands/Services that outlines the process for scheduling and coordinating bi-lateral and multilateral training and exercises enhanced via LVC enablers using ACGU networks. Short term endstate will address OIF/OEF pre-deployment training. Long term solution expected to take several years.
POA&M: Formalize overarching vision statement and reach agreement in principle (c/w)
- Establish ACGU Working Group membership and chair (Policy/Scheduling and Technical/Systems) (c/w)
- Define ACGU training scope
- Establishment of a scheduling process for the JTEN and Virtual & Constructive assets
- Develop and adopt ACGU country agreements/business rules formalizing this process
OPR: USJFCOM; OCRs: USPACOM, USNORTHCOM, USEUCOM, ADF, PJHQ J7, CFD/CFEC, OSD.
I&SJT WG Comments: Need further analysis of combatant command requirements, JKDDC capabilities and costs from a broader system of systems view (relationships between mutually supporting systems such as command LMSs, JTIMS, DRRS, JKDDC, personnel systems). JKDDC is not covering Combatant Command unique learning requirements. JKDDC will be a complementary capability to any Combatant Command deployed LMS.
JUN 09
OCT 09
DEC 09
SEP 08
MAR 09
JAN 10
MAR 10
Approved POA&M
Initial ACGU WG Agreement in principle
Established
ACGU WG
Determine venue for event coordination
Draft ACGU Charter
Enlist OSD rep as WG member
Objectives/End State Obtained; Action Completed 11 11

12. Modeling and Simulation (M&S)
Working Group
30 March 2010
Col Tom Walrond
USJFCOM J-7 12

13. M&S Brief-back
Purpose: To provide a collaborative forum to advance the Joint Training Environment by focusing on M&S capabilities, policy, gaps ,current/future initiatives, interoperability and standards
Discussion:
Training Gap Analysis Forum (TGAF): a mature process executed in February 2010 that combines stakeholder requirements with rigorous frontend analysis
Training M&S Business Plan: Current plan in coordination with other M&S Communities
Application of M&S and Gaming to support deployed Small Unit Mission Rehearsal
Joint Theater Level Simulation (JTLS) way ahead brief: obtain resources to integrate into JLVC , modernize JTLS code and evolve with other M&S simulations
KORCOM: developing an enterprise training capability to support USFK transformation
Outcomes: Formalize an M&S Community of Interest (CoI) to address enterprise level issues that are aligned with Department of Defense (DoD) Training Strategy
Integrated Operations Training Top issues: Cross Domain Information Sharing/interoperability standards
Issues: Recommend be combined with
Supporting Joint Training with the Joint Live, Virtual, Constructive (LVC) Federation
Joint Training Enterprise M&S Gaps (POM 12)
To be filled out by all WG Command Representatives for use in building the AAR and EXSUM for Gen Mattis. 13

14. Supporting Joint Training with the Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Federation
Briefer: Col Tom Walrond
Issue : Diminishing resources dictate the need for a cost effective solution for delivering Joint training. Currently both the JLVC Federation & Joint Theater Level Simulation (JTLS) support Joint training. A revised strategy for development & sustainment of an enterprise training capability that supports Joint training is required
Discussion: The JLVC Federation is the standard for Joint training & provides the most realistic environment to align joint training with combatant command assigned missions, requirements & constraints. The JLVC federation is comprised of both Joint & Service simulations & tools. JTLS supports the combatant command Joint Exercise Program (JEP), yet, JTLS lacks the capability to model high fidelity strategic to tactical operations. This shortfall was noted in the Joint Staff’s Training Capabilities Analysis of Alternatives Gaps JLVC addresses these gaps. Recent cuts to Training Transformation (T2) Research, Development, Testing & Evaluation funds have driven the need for a revised strategy for development & sustainment of an enterprise training capability that can met future training requirements such as those of United States Korea Command (KORCOM). JTLS sustainment is funded (O&M) for FY10. Sustained maintenance of JTLS is required. The JLVC is funded through the FYDP with combatant command funding for event integration (CE2) & USJFCOM T2 funding for development.
Endstate: A single Joint training federation that is compostable, has a low overhead competitive capability, & can meet the training requirements of Tier I – IV training audiences (including those of KORCOM).
POA&M: Develop a JLVC low cost option. Determine capabilities of JTLS needed to be incorporated into the JLVC. Develop a plan for implementing capabilities into the JLVC & conduct a business case analysis to determine cost effectiveness of the plan. Conduct front end analysis of KORCOM training requirements. Obtain needed T2 funding for JLVC development.
OPRs: USJFCOM, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands
MAY - JUL 09
POM 12
NOV 08
MAR 09
AUG 09
SEP 09
MAR 10
Mar 10
FY11
Training Gap
Analysis Forum
Develop JLVC
Low Cost options
Front End Analysis of KORCOM Requirements
Submit PR11 funding Rqmnts
Brief OSD on KORCOM funding strategies
Develop plan with costing to incorporate JTLS Requirements into the JLVC
JTLS / JLVC transition decision
Obtain KORCOM funding
Obtain JTLS funding through FYDP 14

15. Joint Training Enterprise Training Modeling & Simulation Gaps
Briefer: Col Walrond
Issue : Joint Training Enterprise identified key training Modeling & Simulation (M&S) gaps which are currently unfunded.
Discussion: The Joint Training Enterprise executed a M&S Training Gap Analysis Forum (TGAF) on 16 February 2010 in order to re-validate the top training M&S gaps as directed by OSD P&R. The forum was conducted using the established Joint Training Review Group ( JTRG) technical requirement procedures. Re-validation occurred with minimal change to the prioritized issue list. Three of the top identified gaps from the M&S TGAF are currently unfunded (IAMD, Space, Cyber).
Endstate: Approval of validated M&S TGAF process and results; funding or mitigation plans to support the development of solutions that close the training M&S gaps identified by the Joint Training Enterprise.
POA&M: Joint Training Enterprise identified the M&S Gaps; USJFCOM to lead the effort of gap analysis to determine detailed estimated costs to close the gaps. Conduct detailed analysis to determine optimal solutions.
OPR: USJFCOM; OCRs: Combatant Commands; Services
NOV 08
MAR 09
JUL 09
AUG 09
FEB 2010
MAR 2010
AUG 2010
M&S TGAF
Briefed top 5
Training M&S
Gaps at
WJTSC 09-1
M&S TGAF
VTC
Brief analysis at
WJTSC 09-2
M&S TGAF
(Solutions Conference)
M&S TGAF
(Solutions Conference)
M&S TGAF
VTC 15 15