1. Assessing Distribution System Performance: Sampling and Monitoring

2. Outline  Sampling Approach  Field Methods  Representative Sampling:  What, Why, Where  Critical Sites – identifying, sampling considerations, and the process  Optimization Monitoring:  What / Where, Frequency  Summary

3. Assessing Distribution System Performance  Objective: To develop an accurate “picture” of water quality in the distribution system. Optimization Monitoring Representa- tive Sample Sites Sampling Approach

4. Your Sampling Practices  How long do you flush a sample tap before you collect a sample?

5. Sampling Approach: Our Observations  Inconsistent practices for flushing a sample tap before sample collection:  Temperature: Note change by “feel.”  Time: All sites are considered “equal” (i.e., 5 to 15 minutes, 2 songs on the radio).  Flush until you get a “good” sample.  Practices vary by operator.

6. Who Cares? Regulatory vs. Optimization Sampling  For regulatory purposes: Frequently, the focus is on getting a “good” number to meet state regulations  For optimization purposes: The focus is on getting a “representative” number in order to:  Accurately characterize distribution system water quality – both spatially and temporally  Make important process control decisions in the distribution system  The sampling procedure used for optimization can be applied to regulatory sample locations (taps)

7. Calculated Flush Time Approach  A consistent & technically sound approach for sample collection.  Sample should represent water in the distribution system main immediately adjacent to the sample location.  Flush/waste the water in the service line before collecting a sample.  Avoid over-flushing, which may pull in water from another area of the distribution system. Based on article: Collect Representative Distribution System Samples, Opflow, January 2009 Intended Sample Site 6” main 12” main Service Line

8. Key Elements of the Optimization Sampling Approach  Provides guidance for sample taps and hydrants.  Does not use temperature or chlorine residual as indicator of “adequate” flushing.  Time-based flushing approach using the volume of the service line length, diameter, and pre- determined flow rate.

9. General Sampling Approach Can be applied to Taps or Hydrants 1. Estimate the length and diameter of the pipe that is to be flushed. 2. Determine flush time based on an estimated service pipe length, diameter, and flow-rate. 3. Slowly open the tap/hydrant  At a tap: immediately start the timer and verify that the flow is at the desired rate of 2 gpm if tap sampler is not used (e.g., by quickly timing the fill of a measuring cup)  At a hydrant: once the hydrant is fully open, open the flush valve and start the timer. The flow control valve will regulate the flow to 20 gpm 4. After twice the calculated flush time (CFT), or time specified by the rule of thumb, stop flushing and collect the water sample(s).

10. Tap Sampler

11. Step 1: Estimate Pipe Length and Diameter (Tap) Service LineDiameter: Estimate based water system staff knowledge, a system/site map, and/or best judgment.Length: Measure the distance from the meter/curb stop to building (at approximately where the service enters the building). Premise PlumbingDiameter: (Ideally) go into the building to estimate the pipe diameter.Length: (Ideally) go into the building to estimate the pipe length. Note: If the tap is close to where the service line enters the building, the volume of premise plumbing may be negligible. Main Service Line Estimating pipe length and diameter at tap sample Sites can be difficult. Hydrants are preferred for investigative sampling. Premise Plumbing

12. Recommended approach for calculating flush time ~ especially for taps sampled on a routine basis (e.g., TCR). Table shows CFT in minutes Can be determined for any length and pipe diameter Assumes 2 gpm flushing rate Determine CFT from matrix Flush time = 2 times the CFTFlush time = 2 times the CFT (adjust if the flush rate ≠ 2 gpm) Tap CFT Matrix Step 2: Determine Flushing Time- Calculated Flush Time (CFT) Tap Approach

13. Example 20’ of 3/4” Line 30’ of 1/2” Line Premise Plumbing: Pipe Length = 30’, Diameter of Pipe = 1/2” CFT = 0.2 minutes Distribution System Main CFT = 0.2 + 0.2 = 0.4 minutes Total flush time = 2* CFT = 0.8 minutes or 48 seconds Service Line: Pipe Length = 20’, Diameter of Pipe = 3/4” CFT = 0.2 minutes Assumes the flush rate is 2 gpm

14. Step 3 and 4: Flush, Then Collect Water Quality Sample(s) and Record Data  Flush at ~ 2 gpm (verify flow-rate if needed) for total flush time (previous slide).  Measure chlorine residual, temperature and pH and record the results on a data collection sheet.  Also, record the characteristics of the site:  Description of sample site (e.g., Chevron Station 600 Main St.).  CFT (*2) (it might be used in the future).  Type of customer demands (residential, commercial, rural area, old industrial area).  Pressure zone (if applicable).  Others (e.g., characteristics of water sample; site was recently flushed during seasonal flushing program, main pipe material and age).

15. Notes and Recommendations  The procedure provides a reasonable quick and easy estimate of flush time along with a controlled safety factor.  CFTs are only estimates because “precise” measurements of pipe length and diameter would be difficult to obtain.  Try to avoid sample locations where piping diameter/length are unknown.

16. Follow a Similar Approach When Sampling from Hydrants  Easier to estimate hydrant service pipe diameter and length than internal building plumbing.

17. Hydrant Sampler  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_d etailpage&v=2u0rR9TTENw https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_d etailpage&v=2u0rR9TTENw

18. Representative Sample Sites  What: Optimization sample sites that represent water quality throughout your distribution system. Optimization Monitoring Represent a-tive Sample Sites Sampling Approach

19. Representative Sample Sites: Why  Sampling throughout the distribution system helps ensure that your disinfection barrier is in-place! Consider your system… Do you think your current sample sites represent water quality throughout the system? Do you have data to confirm that you have a disinfection barrier throughout your entire system? Do you think some investigative sampling could help you better understand your system?

20. This System Thought Their Disinfection Barrier was Robust, Based on Their Historical Data Chlorine Performance (TCR Sites Only)

21. 22 4 1 0 3 Monitoring at Critical Sites Showed Something Different…

22.  Your system’s representative sample sites should include some combination of:  Plant effluent and/or master meter  Your regulatory sites (i.e., for TCR and DBP sampling)  Critical sites Areas in your system that have poor water quality These are determined (confirmed) by investigative sampling in your system Representative Sample Sites: Where

23.  Areas influenced by (draining) tanks:  With high turnover time (confirmed or suspected)  Operated in series  Standpipes (generally are poorly mixed)  Hydraulic “problem areas”:  O n dead-ends ~ actual and looped (subdivisions)  Towards the “extremities” of the distribution system (hydraulically far from the treatment plant)  Near pressure zone boundaries (i.e., closed valve creates a “hydraulic” dead-end)  Areas where water from different sources is blended Critical Sites Might Include…

24.  Areas with aging pipes (old cast iron lines)  Low demand, low flow, stagnant areas  Water quality problem areas:  At TCR / DBP sites with historically low chlorine residual, high DBPs, coliform occurrences  Areas with persistent customer complaints  In general,  These criteria should be considered when selecting potentially critical sites (i.e., have low chlorine residual); however, water quality data is needed to confirm. Critical Sites (cont.) Low chlorine residual = Critical site (high DBPs, high water age, microbiological risk)

25. Critical Sites Other Considerations  When conducting investigative sampling in your system for optimization, you may measure a free chlorine residual < 0.2 mg/L (especially at a critical sample location!)  Measure total chlorine to assess relative to the regulatory requirement  Write-down the data to determine whether this is a critical site, or a one-time incident  If the residual is extremely low, respond to increase the residual.  Document (write down) what is done in this area!

26. Identification of Critical Sites: Final Thoughts  Flexibility to sample at as many investigative sampling sites as you want to identify water quality problem areas in your system  Based on your investigative sampling results, select a minimum of ten potential sites to monitor on a routine basis (consider monthly during warmer months)  Review your sampling results to identify which sites will become part of your routine optimization monitoring program

27. What could you do with your data?  Assess whether you are meeting the:  disinfection optimization goals  DBP optimization goals (and Stage 2 compliance requirements)  Longer-term, ongoing monitoring data helps tell us whether process adjustments (operational changes) are needed to improve water quality  Assess the impacts of your distribution system optimization efforts.  However - it is difficult to do the above if the data is not collected or lost!!

28. Data Collection Sheet Sample Site Name (Lat & Long) DateTime Free Chlorine (mg/L) Temp. (C) CFT*2 (min) CFT Notes Comments (street location, sample location [faucet, hose, hydrant], description of sample site [i.e., remote, high demand, dead-end, residential, etc.], pipe material, pipe age, pipe diameter, pressure zone, and influence of which tank) EXAMPLE: 121 Main St. 36.5042 Lat -80.674754 Long 7/31/8414:352.1022.42.2 Hydrant Site – 6’ of 6” hydrant lead +9’ of 6’’ line = 15’ of 6’’ line = 1.1*2 = 2.2 flush time (@ 20gpm) Site located in a remote area off of main transmission line, old 6” cast-iron pipe, in low-pressure zone, likely influenced by Tank A

29. Optimization Monitoring: Where are we heading?  What: Long-term, routine sampling at representative sites throughout your distribution system, using the optimization sampling approach, to generate water quality data! Optimization Monitoring Representa- tive Sample Sites Sampling Approach

30. Field Methods Used for Optimization Monitoring

31. Objectives of Optimization Monitoring  To characterize water quality throughout all areas of the distribution system  Hopefully…ensures that the water quality goals (chlorine residual, DBPs) are consistently met  May… identify areas of poor water quality  Definitely… raises system’s awareness of issues in the distribution system!  Ensures integrity of the distribution system (disinfection) barrier is maintained.

32. Field Methods Used  For optimization work, parameter(s) should be:  Useful for process monitoring (i.e., can be used to assess impact of process/operational changes).  Easy to measure and provide relatively quick results.  A surrogate for the parameter of interest (e.g., chlorine).  Primary Parameters:  Free chlorine as surrogate for water age and DBP formation.  Total chlorine, pH, and temperature also measured (to support/verify the primary parameters).  Secondary Parameters:  TTHM and HAA5 (at regulatory sites and entry point to the distribution system).

33. Optimization Monitoring  Routine sampling at representative sites helps us to:  Develop water quality data and trends over time  Have a basis for assessing performance relative to water quality goals  Have data needed before process control is implemented  Confirm that your distribution system barrier is in-place

34. Steps to Assure Data Integrity  Collect representative samples (i.e., using the CFT approach throughout your distribution system)  Be familiar with the field test equipment and test methods  Routinely calibrate (or check) field instruments  Use clean glassware  Use reagents within the expiration date

35. Summary  Establishing a consistent and technically sound sampling approach is the foundation for distribution system optimization  Free chlorine residual is a surrogate for bacteriological water quality, DBPs, and water age. pH, temperature, total chlorine (and DBPs, less frequently) are also useful parameters to assess distribution system water quality  Sample at representative sites (system influent + compliance + critical sites)  Consider determining the CFT and utilizing for your routine sample locations (for TCR, DBPs, etc.)