Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDulcie Burke Modified over 9 years ago
1
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Ecce Homo: Why It’s Great to be Labeled a “Person” Clifford Nass Stanford University
2
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Three Stories Robot best friend Shylock –Bleed –Tickle –Poison –Eyes, hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions Dred Scott case
3
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Lessons to be Learned “Human” is nothing more than a label “Human”: not ontological “Human”: psychological and social
4
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Does the Label Matter? Not philosophical question Is experimental question
5
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Humor — Findings –Funny people are: Smarter More likable More friendly Does not harm performance –Even applies in task situations
6
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Humor — Variables –Independent variables Successful humor vs. no humor HCI vs. CMC –Dependent variables Perception of interactant Behavior Smiling responses
7
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Likable
8
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Cooperation
9
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Actual Task Time
10
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Joking
11
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Smiling
12
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Humor — Implications Profoundly human behaviors are acceptable on computers People will be verbally friendly to computers CMC is basically the same, but –More jokes –More smiles! Cognitive construction of person
13
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Adaptation: Findings Humans: Adaptation is universal Computers: Adaptation is uncommon –Hard problem –Focus on Technology Precision of measurement
14
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Possible processes Social facilitation –Confident people do better when observed –Non-confident people do worse Stress –Opposite of social facilitation Which explanation applies to: –human-computer interaction? –Human-human interaction?
15
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Method Computer-based GRE (same for everyone) IVs –Confidence in prior GRE performance High Low –Adaptation No adaptation Ostensibly adapts based on previous questions
16
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Performance on the GRE CMC
17
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Performance on the GRE HCI
18
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Performance on the GRE
19
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Implications Human label influences response to adaptation –Social facilitation in CMC –Choking in HCI Rarity effects?
20
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Animated Representations Conformity pressure is powerful –Informative –Normative Appearance is powerful
21
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Method Choice-dilemma questionnaire Representation –Text box –Stick figure –Rich animated figure (Ostensible) Interactant –HCI –CMC
22
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Traditional CMC
23
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Animated “People”
24
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Intelligence of Agent
25
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Public Conformity
26
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Implications Representation matters in HCI Representation matters in CMC! –Was that the mental construction? TTS evidence –Can’t draw general conclusions about faces, characters, etc. CMC exerts great social influence
27
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Visible Agents What happens when agents are indistinguishable from humans? –Distinction disappears or –Label makes a difference Expectancy Theory: Everything should match its label
28
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Labeling: Findings Expectation of consistency with label –Better than expected: Great! –Worse than expected: Awful!
29
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Demo Human Slide51.human.movSlide51.human.mov or Synthetic Slide51.synthetic.movSlide51.synthetic.mov
30
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Context Auction Site Human-looking or agent-looking “Human” or “Agent”
31
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Bidding Behavior
32
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Implications Labels matter Appearance matters Humans are held to higher standard
33
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Summary – Part I Turning Turing Test on its head –“Human” is not ontological –Not “Is it human” but “if it’s human, now what?” HCI does NOT equal social interaction But what about “Media Equation”? –Cognitive construction may be at the critical determinant
34
9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Final Question Will robots ever be labeled “human”?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.