1. During 2009-2010, room 206 in the Education Building was redesigned by the CEPS Technology Committee The purpose was to building a new style of classroom that did two things 1. Allowed for more collaboration 2. Incorporated new, cutting edge technologies Focus groups and surveys were recently used to assess the room’s usage and effectiveness

3. Classes in non-trad before?

4. Benefits? Group work Hands on experience Working with and not for the professor Technology present See screens from all angles More professional and better atmosphere

5. Drawbacks? Distractions Space issues Seeing the professor and professor seeing you Noise level Lack of 1:1 student to laptop ratio Professors not being able to fully use technology

6. Likes? Ability to interact w/ professor and other students Ease of information access Feel more comfortable with tech in real-world

7. Dislikes? No coffee Less opportunity to slack off

8. How to Improve? Teaching from the middle More laptops Tech training for students

9. Room Tech Professors using it every class, most of class Students using it very frequently Most used, but to various degrees Computers, Smart Board, Red Cat frequently DVD player, document camera less often

10. Tech to Get External mice Printer Mics and headphones

11. Take more?

13. Classes in non-trad before?

14. Benefits? Easier collaboration Hands on experience w/ technology Flexibility of space Students are more engaged and interactive More technology in room

15. Drawbacks? Traditional pencil & paper testing Non-mobile kiosk Students following teacher visually

16. How to Improve? Mice & keypads for laptops More time to practice with technology

17. Room Tech Professors & students both using it Computers, Smart Board, Red Cat most used Document camera least used

18. Tech to Get Student clickers iPod Touches or iPads

19. Teach more?