Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCecil Gilmore Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 REACH Performance Tasks SY14-15 Library Science June 16, 2014
2
Agenda 2 Introductions Part I : REACH Performance Task Overview Part II : Performance Task Components Part III: SY 14-15
3
Agenda 3 Introductions Part I : REACH Performance Task Overview Part II : Performance Task Components Part III: SY 14-15
4
Performance Tasks as a Part of REACH Students REACH Performance Tasks are one of two student growth measures used in teacher evaluation. 4
5
REACH Performance Task Objectives Measure of Student Growth For teachers, by teachers Aligned to curriculum Communicate expectations Opportunity for collaboration Instructional Tool Build assessment creation skills Provide data on student performance Objectives 5
6
CPS Vision – Five Pillars 6
7
Definition: Performance Task A written or hands-on demonstration of mastery, or progress towards mastery, of a particular skill or standard. Beginning of year and end of year administration measures student mastery over the course of an academic year on a set of identified knowledge, skills, or understanding. Why performance tasks? Narrow but in-depth Reflect long-term, key outcomes Require higher-level and extended thinking 7 7 Overview
8
8 Administration 8 Administration Guidelines of REACH Performance Tasks Designed to be completed in one class period. All students sharing a common subject/grade level/classroom receive the same task with the same directions. Teachers proctor own class and collect tasks at the end. Teachers score the tasks of their students, in teacher teams if possible. Time to Complete Task Assignment Proctoring Protocol Scoring Protocol
9
Approximately 125 task sets (BOY & EOY) across 12 different content areas, grades PK – 12 250 CPS teachers participate in task-writing 30 content specialists support task-writers Over 275,000 students completed Performance Tasks across CPS in SY 13-14 ~5,500 students completed Library Science PTs REACH PT Program Scope 9
10
Agenda 10 Introductions Part I : REACH Performance Task Overview Part II : Performance Task Components Part III: SY 14-15
11
Part II Agenda - Performance Task Components 11 Step 1 – Identify Standards and Desired Student Outcomes Step 2 – Create the Performance Task Step 3 – Create the Scoring Rubric
12
Step 1a: Familiarize yourself with the standard 12 Content leads selected standard(s) using three criteria Measurable within REACH Performance Tasks Foundational to the course or grade level Highly likely to be part of scope and sequence of instruction
13
1. Identify the skill(s)/content assessed in the standard. 2. Identify the stretch level of measurable skill(s)/content 3. Phrase skill(s)/content as measurable objectives for the performance task Step 1b: Identify the skill(s)/content to be assessed from the standard 13 CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.9: Analyze the relationship between a primary and secondary source on the same topic. What is the stretch level of skill(s)/content? AdvancedFoundational Types of sources Analysis of an individual source Comparison and analysis of two or more sources on the same subject
14
Scoring Rubric Task ObjectivesInsufficient ResponseBelow MasteryEmerging MasteryMastery Student distinguishes between types of sources 0 Points? Points Student analyzes an individual source concerning a specific topic Student compares and analyzes the relationship between two or more sources about the same subject 0 Points? Points Summative Score Standards 0 Insufficient Response 1 Below Mastery 2 Emerging Mastery 3 Mastery CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.6-8.9 Analyze the relationship between a primary and secondary source on the same topic. ?-? Points ?-? Points Step 1b: Identify the skill(s)/content to be assessed from the standard 14 Each objective identified will guide development of the task and rubric. These will be referred to as task objectives during rubric design.
15
Part II Agenda - Performance Task Components 15 Step 1 – Identify Standards and Desired Student Outcomes Step 2 – Create the Performance Task Step 3 – Create the Scoring Rubric
16
Principles of Swagg 16
17
Step 2a: Create the Task Activity 17 Design PrinciplesKey Considerations Relevance Incorporates materials and activities that are authentic to instruction and student experience in a given discipline Rigor Maintains high cognitive demand throughout the task Stretch Includes items that address foundational and advanced skills/content within the standard Alignment Measures identified objectives (skills/content) that are aligned with the standard(s) Accessibility Incorporates text and/or activities that all students can engage with, or that can be easily adapted for diverse learners
18
Step 2a: Task Design Principle: Relevance 18 Relevance to:Key Considerations Teachers Task Type Choice reflects course instruction Text-based: Students must respond to or analyze text or data Action-based: Students physically demonstrate understanding Hybrid: Includes both text and activity Materials Brainstorm content resources that ALL teachers have access to Students Activity Activity given in engaging context Students apply situation or challenge to a relatable audience Age Appropriate Utilizes vocabulary and content appropriate for students’ level of understanding
19
Step 2a: Create the Task Activity 19 Design PrinciplesKey Considerations Relevance Incorporates materials and activities that are authentic to instruction and student experience in a given discipline Rigor Maintains high cognitive demand throughout the task Stretch Includes items that address foundational and advanced skills/content within the standard Alignment Measures identified objectives (skills/content) that are aligned with the standard(s) Accessibility Incorporates text and/or activities that all students can engage with, or that can be easily adapted for diverse learners
20
Step 2a: Task Design Principle: Rigor 20 RIGOR What is it? Refers to the complexity of cognitive demand and/or skill demonstration. Why incorporate higher levels of rigor? Encourages higher-order thinking More in-depth assessment of student learning How do you incorporate higher levels of rigor? Use Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Framework to craft task activity. Similar to Bloom’s Taxonomy 4 levels measure increasing complexity Concise approach to measuring the level of cognitive demand of a task, question, assignment, etc.
21
Step 2a: Task Design Principle: Rigor 21 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Framework Level 1 Recall requires simple remembrance or identification of such information as a fact, definition, term, or simple procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept involves some mental skills, concepts, or processing beyond a habitual response; students must make some decisions about how to approach a problem or activity. Level 3 Strategic Thinking requires reasoning, planning, using evidence, and thinking at a higher level. Level 4 Extended Thinking requires complex reasoning, planning, developing, and thinking, most likely over an extended time. Cognitive demands are high, and students are required to make connections both within and among subject domains. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/news/coverStories/aligning_alternate_assessments.php
23
Step 2a: Create the Task Activity 23 Design PrinciplesKey Considerations Relevance Incorporates materials and activities that are authentic to instruction and student experience in a given discipline Rigor Maintains high cognitive demand throughout the task Stretch Includes items that address foundational and advanced skills/content within the standard Alignment Measures identified objectives (skills/content) that are aligned with the standard(s) Accessibility Incorporates text and/or activities that all students can engage with, or that can be easily adapted for diverse learners
24
Step 2a: Task Design Principle: Rigor vs. Stretch 24 Stretch in REACH Performance Tasks The task activity should measure varying levels of skill/content within a standard. 1.Provides a more precise baseline measure 2.More effectively captures student growth Foundational Advanced STRETCH (Skill/Content Levels)
25
Step 2a: Task Design Principle: Rigor vs. Stretch 25 Stretch in REACH Performance Tasks The task activity should measure varying levels of skill/content within a standard. 1.Provides a more precise baseline measure 2.More effectively captures student growth Foundational Advanced STRETCH (Skill/Content Levels)
26
Step 2a: Create the Task Activity 26 Design PrinciplesKey Considerations Relevance Incorporates materials and activities that are authentic to instruction and student experience in a given discipline Rigor Maintains high cognitive demand throughout the task Stretch Includes items that address foundational and advanced skills/content within the standard Alignment Measures identified objectives (skills/content) that are aligned with the standard(s) Accessibility Incorporates text and/or activities that all students can engage with, or that can be easily adapted for diverse learners
27
Step 2a: Create the Task Activity 27 Design PrinciplesKey Considerations Relevance Incorporates materials and activities that are authentic to instruction and student experience in a given discipline Rigor Maintains high cognitive demand throughout the task Stretch Includes items that address foundational and advanced skills/content within the standard Alignment Measures identified objectives (skills/content) that are aligned with the standard(s) Accessibility Incorporates text and/or activities that all students can engage with, or that can be easily adapted for diverse learners
28
Step 2a: Task Design Principle: Accessibility 28 AccessibilityKey Considerations Text-Based Tasks Select shorter text (10-15 minutes max to read) Define complex or unfamiliar vocabulary within text Avoid cultural, class and linguistic bias Age and grade level appropriate Provide embedded text supports (pictures, headings, etc) Action-Based Tasks Design activity so that all student can engage Add accommodations, if necessary, for physical challenges Incorporate varying means of task delivery and demonstration of mastery
29
Agenda 29 Introductions Part I : REACH Performance Task Overview Part II : Performance Task Components Part III: SY 14-15
30
REACH Performance Tasks SY 14-15 30 ALL CPS teachers must administer a BOY and EOY Performance Task to one of their classrooms in SY 14-15 SY 14-15 BOY window: Sept. 15 - Oct. 17 Beginning of year (BOY) tasks provide a baseline measure of student proficiency ‐Teachers can target areas of improvement for their students based on their analysis of student work SY 14-15 EOY window: May 11 – June 12 End of year (EOY) tasks capture whether or not students “grew” along the assessed standard
31
REACH PT Completion 31 1.Tasks are ordered from the Department of Student Assessment through a distributed Google Form (survey) PTs are delivered to schools at the start of the window Tasks are also downloadable on the Knowledge Center 2.Teachers enter their students’ BOY and EOY scores into CIM while the respective windows are open 3.Teachers use the Performance Task Verification process (in the Battelle for Kids system) to confirm which task they administered to which students
32
REACH PT BOY 14-15 Timeline 32 Teachers Order BOY Tasks Using Google Form 8/25 – 8/29 BOY WINDOW Administration, Scoring, and Data Entry 9/15 – 10/17 Tasks Delivered to Schools 9/15 – 9/17 Tasks Uploaded to Knowledge Center 9/8 – 9/10
33
THANK YOU! 33
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.