Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

10 Myths and Mistakes of First Generation TOD presentation to Prince George’s County Planning Staff Alia Anderson, ULI Washington June 29, 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "10 Myths and Mistakes of First Generation TOD presentation to Prince George’s County Planning Staff Alia Anderson, ULI Washington June 29, 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 10 Myths and Mistakes of First Generation TOD presentation to Prince George’s County Planning Staff Alia Anderson, ULI Washington June 29, 2012

2 Characteristics: Close to high-quality transit High(er) Density Mixed-use Walkable Less parkingBenefits: Reduced transportation costs Community investment and revitalization Improved job access and regional economic competitiveness Enhanced community amenities including retail, services, open space, institutional uses Less congestion and improved air quality Healthier families with reduced obesity rates Transit-oriented Development (TOD)

3 1. Transit-adjacent ≠ Transit-oriented TOD = A walkable neighborhood near transit Transit station platforms must be an easy and attractive walk to destinations Sidewalks must be wide, well-lighted and landscaped Small parks and open spaces throughout

4 1. Transit-adjacent ≠ Transit-oriented Example: Mockingbird Station, Dallas Model TOD has been criticized for lack of strong pedestrian connectivity Mockingbird Station, Dallas Texas http://www.dallascityhall.com/forwardDallas/pdf/UrbanDesignElement.pdf

5 2. Overbuilding Retail Why is mixed-use fundamental to TOD?  Active streetscape  Walk to errands, lunch, etc.But… Many places can’t support entire ground floor of retail Goal is mixed-use district – not every building has to be vertical mixed-use Can activate streetscape in other ways Siena Park, Arlington

6 3. Who benefits from TOD? Many early TOD projects didn’t prioritize affordability Low income people spend higher portion of income on housing + transportation New development can lead to increased surrounding property values Solutions Solutions Preservation New Units

7 3. Who benefits from TOD? Preservation of existing affordable units Help maintain district affordability & preserve neighborhood character Help bring community on board with TOD Case Study: LA Housing Dept. TOD Preservation http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/PDFs/20120524L AHDTODPreservationFinal.pdf

8 3. Who benefits from TOD? New Units Regulatory strategies or incentives Market-affordable projects Property Acquisition Case Study: Rhode Island Station, Washington, DC

9 4. Family-oriented TOD  Biggest demand for TOD coming from empty nesters and young professionals  Family-friendly TOD can:  Create diverse and stable communities around transit  Help retain existing residents  Improve physical activity and access to opportunity for youth Strategies: Identify which stations are best for family- focused TOD Involve students and youth in your planning process Create a place for school officials in the planning process

10 5. NIMBYs Creating YIMBYs takes: Long-term commitment Ex: Great Communities Collaborative Early public engagement Champions “Developers worry about the market but fear public process.”

11 5. NIMBYs What we know about champions: One Champion must be an influential political official Champions need to be able to make the business case Projects also need “Technical Champions” Project champions need to know, trust and work together Champions need to be in it for the long haul

12 6. Myth: “If you zone it, they will come” Transit alone is not enough Great zoning alone is not enough TOD ingredients:  Transit  Market  Infrastructure  Zoning Might involve saying NO to projects Requiring new partnerships Example: Central Corridor Funders Collaborative “Is greenfield development still cheaper and easier than infill and TOD?”

13 7. Creative parking and TDM Parking drives the economics and design of a project A study found that TOD projects in CA provided 37% more parking spaces than needed during peak hours. “Are TODs Over-Parked?” Cervero et. al. 2011 Strategies: Shared parking, Market pricing, Variable pricing, Parking maximums…. Creative transportation demand management programs: Example: Pleasant Hill BART Station Segwey-share

14 8. Prioritizing TOD efforts Jurisdictions must have laser focus on priority areas Case Study: Portland Metro’s TOD Strategic Plan

15 9. The Role of Transit Focus is on frequency and reliability of transit, not mode Some success with BRT TOD but still limited Example: Cleveland TOD without transit? Walkable Urban Places $4.3 billion in private investment along corridor In the DC region, as walkability features that attract pedestrians increase, so do office, residential, and retail rents, retail revenues, and for-sale residential values. “Walk this Way: The Economic Promise of Walkable Places in Metropolitan Washington, D.C.” Lineberger and Alfonzo, 2012

16 10. Making TOD Unique Most people think of TOD as…. TOD should be unique and indigenous Historic Preservation is key Product depends on the context Housing Office Retail (big box?) Case Study: Englewood, CO

17 Transit-oriented Development (TOD) Questions and Feedback


Download ppt "10 Myths and Mistakes of First Generation TOD presentation to Prince George’s County Planning Staff Alia Anderson, ULI Washington June 29, 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google