Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byShawn Strickland Modified over 9 years ago
1
I. Structural Aspects Sphere PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: Unit Cell Hand-Outs: 7
2
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC a a a = side of unit cell (Å, pm) = angle between 2 sides =120 “Coordinate System” Unit Cell Hand-Outs: 7
3
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC “A” a a Unit Cell A: (0, 0) a = side of unit cell (Å, pm) = angle between 2 sides =120 Hand-Outs: 7
4
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC “A” a a Unit Cell A: (0, 0) B: (1/3, 2/3) “B” a = side of unit cell (Å, pm) = angle between 2 sides =120 Hand-Outs: 7
5
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC “A” a a Unit Cell A: (0, 0) B: (1/3, 2/3) C: (2/3, 1/3) “Fractional Coordinates” “B” “C” a = side of unit cell (Å, pm) = angle between 2 sides =120 Hand-Outs: 7
6
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Three-Dimensions: Tetrahedron, ca. 79% Efficiency 70.5 Hand-Outs: 7
7
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Three-Dimensions: Tetrahedron, ca. 79% Efficiency 70.5 CANNOT fill 3D space with just tetrahedra! Hand-Outs: 7
8
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Three-Dimensions: Tetrahedron, ca. 79% Efficiency 70.5 CANNOT fill 3D space with just tetrahedra! Three-Dimensions: PERIODIC (Closest Packing: ca. 74% Efficiency) 1 st Layer: over “A” sites (0, 0) 2 nd Layer: over “B” sites (1/3, 2/3) Hand-Outs: 7
9
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Hexagonally Closest Packed HCP Cubic Closest Packed CCP = FCC A B A B A B C A ABAB h “h” = “BAB” or “CBC” or … ABCABC c “c” = “ABC” or “BCA” or … Jagodzinski Symbol c Coordination Environments Hand-Outs: 8
10
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Hexagonally Closest Packed HCP Cubic Closest Packed CCP = FCC A B A B A B C A ABAB h “h” = “BAB” or “CBC” or … Unit Cell c-axis: 2 closest packed layers c/a = (8/3) = 1.633 A: (0, 0, 0); B: (1/3, 2/3, 1/2) ABCABC c “c” = “ABC” or “BCA” or … Unit Cell c-axis: 3 closest packed layers c/a = ( (8/3)(3/2) = 6 = 3 / (1/ 2) A: (0, 0, 0); B: (1/3, 2/3, 1/3); C: (2/3, 1/3, 2/3) Jagodzinski Symbol c Hand-Outs: 8
11
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 La (DHCP): B C A A A ABACABAC Sm: hhc Examples: Hand-Outs: 8
12
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 La (DHCP): B C A A A ABACABAC hchchc “ hc ” Sm: hhc = BABACACBCBAB Examples: Hand-Outs: 8
13
Number of CP Layers in Unit Cell Number of Different Sequences Stacking Sequence Jagodzinski Symbol 21 AB h 31 ABC c 41 ABAC hc 51 62 73 86 97 1016 1121 1243 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Exercise: Fill in the Blanks, at Least for 5-8 layers Hand-Outs: 9
14
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Packing EfficienciesWells, pp. 141-161 Body-Centered Cubic Packing Unit Cell Efficiency = 2V sphere / V cell Hand-Outs: 10
15
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Packing EfficienciesWells, pp. 141-161 Body-Centered Cubic Packing Efficiency = 2V sphere / V cell V cell = a 3 R sphere = ( 3/4)a V sphere = (4 /3)(R sphere ) 3 = ( 3 /16)a 3 Unit Cell a 2a2a Hand-Outs: 10
16
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Packing EfficienciesWells, pp. 141-161 CNNameSphere Density 6Simple Cubic0.5236 8Simple Hexagonal0.6046 8 + 6Body-Centered Cubic0.6802 10Body-Centered Tetragonal0.6981 11Tetragonal Close-Packing0.7187 12Closest Packing0.7405 Body-Centered Cubic Packing Unit Cell a 2a2a Coordination Environment Efficiency = 2V sphere / V cell = ( 3 /8) = 0.6802 V cell = a 3 R sphere = ( 3/4)a V sphere = (4 /3)(R sphere ) 3 = ( 3 /16)a 3 Hand-Outs: 10
17
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 How to Quickly Draw a Closest Packing: Projection of 2 closest packed planes Hand-Outs: 11
18
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 How to Quickly Draw a Closest Packing: Hand-Outs: 11
19
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 How to Quickly Draw a Closest Packing: Hand-Outs: 11
20
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Octahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 1 octahedral void / 2 atoms closest packed layers : 1 octahedral void / 1 atom Hand-Outs: 11
21
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Octahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 1 octahedral void / 2 atoms closest packed layers : 1 octahedral void / 1 atom HCP: share faces, edges AcBcAcBc CCP: share edges, corners AcBaCbAcBaCb A B c Hand-Outs: 11
22
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Tetrahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 2 tetrahedral voids / 2 atoms closest packed layers : 2 tetrahedral void / 1 atom Hand-Outs: 11
23
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Tetrahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 2 tetrahedral voids / 2 atoms closest packed layers : 2 tetrahedral void / 1 atom HCP: share faces, edges AbaBabAbaBab CCP: share edges, corners AbaBcbCacAbaBcbCac A B a b Hand-Outs: 11
24
I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Radius RatiosWells, pp. 141-161 Coordination Number Optimum Radius Ratio Coordination Polyhedron 40.225Tetrahedron 60.414Octahedron 0.528Trigonal Prism 80.732Cube 90.732Tricapped Trigonal Prism 120.902Icosahedron 1.000Cuboctahedron (ccp) 1.000Triangular Orthobicupola (hcp) Octahedral Hole Hand-Outs: 11
25
I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Atoms and ions are not “hard spheres;” What factors inflence “atomic radii”? Hand-Outs: 12
26
Atoms and ions are not “hard spheres;” What factors inflence “atomic radii”? (1) Repulsive Forces: approach of uncharged atoms with filled valence subshells (van der Waals radii) (2) Attractive Forces: effective nuclear charge; orbital overlap; electrostatic (metallic, covalent or ionic radii) I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12
27
Atoms and ions are not “hard spheres;” What factors inflence “atomic radii”? (1) Repulsive Forces: approach of uncharged atoms with filled valence subshells (van der Waals radii) (2) Attractive Forces: effective nuclear charge; orbital overlap; electrostatic (metallic, covalent or ionic radii) Scales of Atomic and Ionic Radii: Slater, Goldschmidt, Pauling – empirical, based on extensive surveys of interatomic distances. Some corrected for coordination numbers, ionicity, valence bond types, etc. I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12
28
Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 = d / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12
29
M(s) M(g) Filling M-M Bonding States Filling M-M Antibonding States Minimum Radii Maximum Cohesive E. I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 13
30
Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 = d / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 Estimation Strategies: (1) Constant V atom (How to estimate R 12 from BCC elements (R 8 )) FCC vs. BCC:V atom = (a FCC ) 3 / 4 = (a BCC ) 3 / 2 d FCC = 2R 12 = a FCC / 2 d BCC = 2R 8 = 3 a BCC / 2 Therefore, R 8 = 0.972 R 12 I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12-13
31
Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 = d / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 Estimation Strategies: (1) Constant V atom (2) Use alloys that show close packed structures, e.g., Ag 3 Sb (HCP) – provides R 12 (Sb) I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12-13
32
Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 = d / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 Estimation Strategies: (1) Constant V atom (2) Use alloys that show close packed structures, e.g., Ag 3 Sb (HCP) – provides R 12 (Sb) (3) Linear extrapolation of solid solutions of the element in a close packed metal. I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12-13
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.