Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWarren Houston Modified over 9 years ago
1
The DREAM Act: Myth v. Reality
2
First introduced in 2001 Introduced several times throughout the past decade: 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010 Most recently re-introduced May 2011
3
DREAM History DREAM Provisions DREAM: Myth v. Reality Future of DREAM??
4
Conditional non-immigrant status if: Under 29 years of age Arrived in U.S. at age 15 or younger Have been in U.S. for at least 5 years
5
Conditional non-immigrant status if: Graduated from American HS or obtained GED “Good moral character” as defined by DHS Registers for Selective Service Underwent security and law-enforcement checks
6
EXCLUDES non-immigrant status if: Committed one felony or three misdemeanors Engaged in voter fraud or unlawful voting Committed marriage fraud Abused a student visa
7
Conditional Permanent Residency: At 6 year period must prove: Acquired college degree or two years in a program for a bachelor’s degree Served at least 2 years in the armed forces or have honorable discharge
8
Myth #1: Grants Automatic Citizenship to Illegal Immigrants Myth #2: This is a Disguised Amnesty Program Myth #3: Gives Scarce Aid Dollars to Non- Citizens Myth #4: Costs Taxpayer’s Money Myth #5: Creates Magnet Effect Myth #6: Partisan Issue
10
Myth #1: Grants Automatic Citizenship Fact #1: Students go through conditional nonimmigrant status AND conditional permanent residency status (NOT automatic citizenship)
11
Slide 11 © NASFAA 2011 Myth #2: Disguised Amnesty Program Fact #2: Students themselves have committed no crime. And, DREAM does not simply grant automatic citizenship.
12
Slide 12 © NASFAA 2011 Myth #3: Gives our Scarce Aid Dollars to Non-citizens Fact #3: DREAM students are only eligible for loans and FWS
13
Slide 13 © NASFAA 2011 Myth #4: DREAM Costs Taypayers Money Fact #4: DREAM students would generate over $1 trillion in income over a 40-year period and the bill would reduce deficits by about $1.4 billion over 10 years.
14
Slide 14 © NASFAA 2011 Myth #5: Creates a Magnet Effect Fact #5: According to recent research, immigration is actually down across the country.
15
Slide 15 © NASFAA 2011 Myth #6: DREAM is a Partisan Issue Fact #6: DREAM has traditionally had bipartisan support
16
Current State Policies Regarding Undocumented Students (May, 2011) Allows in-state tuition for some undocumented students and makes them eligible for state aid New Mexico, Texas, California Allows in-state tuition for some undocumented students but not state financial aid Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Nebraska, New York, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin Does not specifically allow in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants but has other tuition policies that result in many undocumented students paying in- state rates Minnesota, Nevada Explicitly prohibits undocumented immigrants from being granted in-state tuition Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Oklahoma Bans admission of undocumented immigrants at some or all public colleges Alabama (banned at public two-year colleges), Georgia (banned at selective public institutions), South Carolina (banned at all publics) Unstipulated policy Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut*, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon*, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming *Currently considering legislation that would allow in-state tuition for undocumented students ^Currently considering legislation that would make undocumented students ineligible for in-state tuition Sources: National Conference of State Legislatures (2011); Chronicle of Higher Education (2010, July 25); Russell (2011)
17
Admissions: In general, the admissions policies of public institutions are consistent with the policy environment of the states in which they are located Tuition Policies: The majority of public institutions (86%) in states with inclusive tuition policies reported allowing undocumented students to pay in-state tuition; erring on the side of more restrictive in unstipulated environments Financial Aid Policies: Erring on the side of more restrictive in unstipulated environments; 80% of institutions located in states with unstipulated or restrictive policies reported that they do not provide any kind of financial aid for undocumented students; private institutions are more likely than publics to award financial aid to undocumented; 92% of aid is institutional aid
18
Bring Us One Step Closer to Filling the 20 Million Hole in College Educated Workers
19
Original supporter of the DREAM Act Continued to support throughout the last decade NASFAA Board recently voted unanimously to not only support the DREAM Act but to support administrative relief for otherwise DREAMers
20
Future of the DREAM Act
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.