Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGwendoline Wade Modified over 9 years ago
1
Professor Ewan Ferlie Dept of Management King’s College London January 2013 Presentation at NHS Confederation Event
2
Introduction Consider the theory and practice of organisational process research and why it may be a useful and distinctive approach to case based work; Large scale designs and connection to theory; Getting beyond the single descriptive case; Give a worked example from NIHR funded research on managed networks in health care;
3
Organizational Process Research Pettigrew is a key UK author ; A major current within general management research, associated with ‘soft’ strategy; ‘getting beyond the variables paradigm of the 1960s’ (Aston Group) Interest in processes of strategic change and of resistance to such change; Historical, cultural and political perspectives; Fitted well with the UK of the 1980s as a ‘high change’ decade (Pettigrew et al, 1992 on NHS); both private and public sectors; Also a more managerialist interest in ‘performance’;
4
Some Key Characteristics Treat ‘implementation’ as problematic and as something to be accomplished; Comparative case study designs; n=8! Purposeful selection of cases; Longitudinal and retrospective: where there is a clear organisational outcome to explain; Processual elements – decision streams unfold over time (Mintzbergian notion of strategy); rich seam of organisational politics;
5
Some Key Characteristics Contextual: - inner context; - outer context; narratives of health policy ‘reforming’; - receptive and non receptive contexts for strategic change (Pettigrew et al, 1992); Multi layered designs; Operates at the meso/strategic level rather than the macro (national health policy) or the micro level (the clinical team);
6
Research Methods Documents; Observation of meetings; Semi structured interviews; Team management and writing up the cases; What is a good case study? Comparative analysis;
7
Managed Networks Study Ferlie et al (2010) – nature, impact and performance of a set of 8 managed networks set up in the early 2000s (2006-09); Complex and large scale sites; 4 different pairs; E.g. Urban and County Cancer Networks; Attempt at a performance assessment and generation of proxy indicators; Emblematic New Labour reform to health policy so policy connected; (luckily for us) end of the New Labour period in May 2010;
8
Managed Networks Study 8 comparative cases, using standard methods; Approx 220 interviews; Retrospective following through of a major tracer issue E.g. Urology IOG in the cancer networks; Team of five researchers; Many team meetings at the end of the project to make sense of what we have found; Comparative cases written up in a common format;
9
Managed Networks Study First article addressed health policy implications (Ferlie et a, 2010) and made a measured defence of networks in ‘wicked problem’ arenas as the least bad governance mode; Of direct policy relevance – Future Forum workstream on networks (2011) picked up the Public Administration article ; Later article (Ferlie et al, 2012) developed an overall theoretical interpretation of governance modes found – Foucault and governmentality stream of literature;
10
Managed Networks Study Helped generate a distinctive overall interpretation of a New Labour period (1997-2010) in English health policy; Networks Vs Targets/terror (Hood and Bevan) Marketisation (Mayes et al)
11
Concluding Discussion Critics would see it as a relatively conservative variant of case study research; Large scale and comparative designs (so need big research teams and grants); Increases external validity concerns; there is always a concern for informing policy; In principle, can mix well with more quantitative components in a mixed design; Not hostile to a notion of proxy ‘performance’ measures (implicitly rather managerialist, see Pettigrew et al, 1992?); not really ‘critical’ enough?;
12
Concluding Discussion Important element of longitudinality makes it unsuitable for short studies; Comes with a sophisticated methodological discussion in mainstream org studies literature (Eisenhardt, 1989; Langley, 1999); Need good writing skills of a historian; Open to theory, including basic social science theory, as a way of emplacing the many empirical observations;
13
References Eisenhardt, K. (1989) ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Ferlie, E., Exworthy, M., FitzGerald, L. and Addicott, R. (2010) ‘Networks in Health Care: A Comparative Study of Their Management, Impact and Performance’, Final Report to NIHR, HS and DR project: 08/1518/102 Ferlie, L. FitzGerald, McGivern, G., Dopson, S. and Bennett, C. (2011) ‘Public Policy Networks and ‘Wicked Problems’: A Nascent Solution?’, Public Administration, 89(2): 307-324.
14
References E. Ferlie, G. McGivern and L. FitzGerald (2012) ‘New Modes of Organizing in Health Care?: Governmentality and Managed Networks in Cancer Services in England’, Social Science and Medicine, 74(3): 340-347 Langley, A. (1999) ‘Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data’ Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710. Pettigrew, A. (1990) ‘Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice’. Organization Science, 1(3): 267-292 Pettigrew, A., Ferlie, E. and McKee, L. (1992) ‘Shaping Strategic Change’, London: Sage
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.