1. EMA2 IDEAS PhD and Postdoc

2. Name of Home Institution 1. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India 2 (22%) 2. Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan 0 (0%) 3. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia 1 (11%) 4. Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan 1 (11%) 5. Tribhuvan University, Nepal3 (33%) 6. Other2 (22%)

3. Name of Host Institution 1. Mälardalen University, Sweden 3 (33%) 2. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands 1 (11%) 3. University of Abertay Dundee, United Kingdom 1 (11%) 4. University of Tartu, Estonia1 (11%) 5. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia,Spain 1 (11%) 6. Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain 2 (22%) 7. Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Germany 0 (0%)

4. Duration of Mobility 1. 10 months6 (67%) 2. 20 months2 (22%) 3. 30 months1 (11%) 4. Other - due to special circumstances 0 (0%)

5. Which Target Group do you belong to? 1. TG 14 (44%) 2. TG 25 (56%)

6. How did you learn about this scholarship programme? 1. Through fellow student1 (11%) 2. Through colleague/ staff member at Home Institution 6 (67%) 3. Through advertisement in magazine/ news paper/ brochure 0 (0%) 4. Through internet/ web site2 (22%) 5. Other1 (11%)

7. The overall information on the IDEAS project web site about application process: 1. Excellent5 (56%) 2. Very satisfied4 (44%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

8. Information and instructions you received about the final selection and nomination for an IDEAS Scholarship: 1. Excellent6 (67%) 2. Very satisfied3 (33%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

9. The way the IDEAS coordination team replied and was accessibile for futher information during application and nomination process: 1. Excellent8 (89%) 2. Very satisfied1 (11%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

10. Availability of information by Home Institution on academic matters (academic strenght of Host Institution; research facilities etc.) 1. Excellent2 (22%) 2. Very satisfied5 (56%) 3. Adequate1 (11%) 4. Not satisfied1 (11%)

11. Availability of information by Home Institution on organizational matters of the IDEAS project: 1. Excellent2 (22%) 2. Very satisfied5 (56%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied2 (22%)

12. Availability of information by Host Institution on academic matters(academic strenght and research fields; teaching and lab facilities, English taught courses, international networking etc.) 1. Excellent5 (56%) 2. Very satisfied4 (44%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

13. Availability by Host Institution of information, including advising, on organisational matters of the IDEAS project: 1. Excellent3 (33%) 2. Very satisfied4 (44%) 3. Adequate2 (22%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

14. Was the work load at the Host Institution well balanced? 1. Excellent3 (33%) 2. Very satisfied6 (67%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

15. Style of supervision and academic support at Host Institution: 1. Excellent6 (67%) 2. Very satisfied3 (33%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

16. Supervisor's support and guidance at Host Institution: 1. Excellent7 (78%) 2. Very satisfied2 (22%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

17. Supervisor's support and guidance at Home Institution: 1. Excellent4 (44%) 2. Very satisfied5 (56%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

18. Did you fulfill the objectives you had set out in your work plan? 1. Yes4 (44%) 2. Fulfilled most of them3 (33%) 3. Fulfilled some of them1 (11%) 4. No0 (0%) 5. My work plan changed due to several reasons 1 (11%)

19. Did you attend any courses or conferences during or after your mobility period? 1. Yes8 (89%) 2. No1 (11%)

20. Will you be awarded an academic degree from your Host Insititution? 1. Yes3 (33%) 2. No6 (67%)

21. Was the lenght of the mobility adequate? 1. Excellent1 (11%) 2. Should be longer2 (22%) 3. Adequate5 (56%) 4. Should be shorter1 (11%)

22. Did you have difficulty in obtaining a VISA or Residence Permit? 1. Yes4 (44%) 2. No5 (56%)

23. The granted Erasmus Mundus scholarship was sufficient to cover the costs of the mobility period: 1. Excellent1 (11%) 2. Very satisfied6 (67%) 3. Adequate2 (22%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

24. Were the Host Institution's arragements regarding bank transfer of scholarship effective? 1. Excellent4 (44%) 2. Very satisfied3 (33%) 3. Adequate1 (11%) 4. Not satisfied1 (11%)

25. Campus facilities at Host Institution: 1. Excellent4 (44%) 2. Very satisfied3 (33%) 3. Adequate2 (22%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

26. Research facilities at the Host Institution in your area of research: 1. Excellent4 (44%) 2. Very satisfied4 (44%) 3. Adequate1 (11%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

27. Accommodation arranged by Host Institution: 1. Yes6 (67%) 2. No3 (33%)

28. Quality of accommodation: 1. Excellent1 (11%) 2. Very satisfied4 (44%) 3. Adequate3 (33%) 4. Not satisfied1 (11%)

29. Service at Host Institution offered by administrative staff (International Office, Student Services etc.): 1. Excellent7 (78%) 2. Very satisfied2 (22%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

30. Arrangement for your health and liability insurance: 1. Excellent1 (11%) 2. Very satisfied4 (44%) 3. Adequate2 (22%) 4. Not satisfied2 (22%)

31. Social activites at Host Institution: 1. Excellent1 (11%) 2. Very satisfied5 (56%) 3. Adequate3 (33%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

32. Did you take part in language course of the host country language: 1. Yes6 (67%) 2. No3 (33%)

33. Your knowledge of the host country language at end of mobility period: 1. Excellent0 (0%) 2. Very good1 (11%) 3. Adequate6 (67%) 4. Not good2 (22%)

34. Your stay at personal level: 1. Excellent1 (11%) 2. Very satisfied7 (78%) 3. Adequate1 (11%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

35. Your stay at academic level: 1. Excellent5 (56%) 2. Very satisfied4 (44%) 3. Adequate0 (0%) 4. Not satisfied0 (0%)

36. Will this mobility improve your career prospects at Home Institution: 1. Yes9 (100%) 2. No0 (0%)

37. Will this mobility improve your career prospects in Home Country: 1. Yes9 (100%) 2. No0 (0%)

38. Will this mobility improve your career prospects at international level: 1. Yes9 (100%) 2. No0 (0%)

39. Would you recommend the Erasmus Mundus Programme to others? 1. Yes9 (100%) 2. No0 (0%)

40. What is your overall rating of the programme on a scale of one to ten (one is the lowest rating and ten is the best)?: 1. 10 (0%) 2. 20 (0%) 3. 30 (0%) 4. 40 (0%) 5. 50 (0%) 6. 60 (0%) 7. 71 (11%) 8. 84 (44%) 9. 92 (22%) 10. 102 (22%)