Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CLASSIFICATION “Grouping together items into categories based on a set criteria”

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CLASSIFICATION “Grouping together items into categories based on a set criteria”"— Presentation transcript:

1 CLASSIFICATION “Grouping together items into categories based on a set criteria”

2 Group Activity get yourselves into groups of 4
Brainstorm and list 20 domesticated animals -your job is to group your list of animals into different categories -you MUST: -use more than three categories -be prepared to describe the criteria you used for your groupings

3 Biological Classifcation
“Systematic grouping of organisms into categories on the basis of defined criteria” Taxonomy “the science of classifying ALL organisms”

4 Taxonomy Very general millions of species? - how to start classifying?
behaviour where they live/habitat appearance and characteristics (MORPHOLOGY) Mosquitoes –50 species Seed plants – species

5 Challenges to Classification?
- Yesterday? Variation: over space and time among individuals Evolution DNA

6 History of Classification
The biggest classification problem has always been consistency History of Classification (Coles notes) Ancient Greece First to introduce classification and binomial definition classify ALL LIVING things (Historia Animalium) blood/no blood, water/land -Hierarchical; each organism fixed position Humans Animals Plants Great Chain of Being Issues? complex plants below simple animals little genetic relationship Evolution? Aristotle (384 – 322 BC)

7 Carl Linnaeus (1707 - 1778) Irregularity amongst names
Virtually no innovation to Aristotle’s work till the 16th century virtually 2000 years!!! -shamans/Aboriginal healers/Andrea Cesalpino Irregularity amongst names needed agreed upon set of naming guidelines Scientific naming Carl Linnaeus ( ) Cesalpino went against Aristotle’s ideas. Linnaeus was Swedish naturalist - the father of taxonomy - 2 key contributions to classification: Consistent way of grouping species according to morphological similarities

8 Binomial Nomenclature
Naming system - 2 parts 1. Genus  species; capitalized, italicized 2. species  specific species; italicized Gerbera hybrida Binomial Nomenclature Flawed –bc of classifications he chose standard naming system for all organisms simple convenient flawed Systema Nature (1735)

9 Ursus americanus Share many characteristics Ursus maritimus Share few characteristics Phascolarctus cinereus

10 Ranks based on shared characteristics
Taxonomic Levels General/fewer similarities kingdom phylum class order family genus species Animalia Chordata Mammalia Primates Hominidae Homo sapiens Ranks based on shared characteristics -each level = taxon Specific/more - refined into subcategories

11 Dichotomous Keys “structure in which a large set of items is broken down into smaller subset, ultimately leading to the smallest available classification unit.” - series of branching two-part statements used to identify organisms - large set broken down to smallest classification unit - larger number of species, the more specific questions become Difficulties? number of species distinguishing characteristics are internal agreeing on criteria Page 18 Textbook Dichotomous Key practice

12 Activity Get into groups of 4-6
Within your group you will be creating your own dichotomous key The subject of your key will be classifying each member of your group Remember dichotomous keys “are a series of branching two-part statements used to identify organisms.” Therefore your keys need to contain multiple steps and be specific When, finished, you must demonstrate the viability of your key to Mr. Faulhafer for assessment Complete questions 5 and 8 on page 20 of textbook


Download ppt "CLASSIFICATION “Grouping together items into categories based on a set criteria”"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google