1. CKM priority setting 2015: CC Team CKM Team Meeting Addis Ababa, February 2015

2. Team members

3. CKM Delivery Areas Prioritization

4. Perceived importance of CKM delivery areas from participatory matrix scoring

5. Perceived importance of CKM delivery areas from participatory matrix scoring: embedded versus institutional

6. Perceived importance of CKM delivery areas from participatory matrix scoring – by team type

7. Pairwise ranking: Relative importance of CKM delivery areas

8. CKM Enablers Ranking

9. CKM Enablers at ILRI 4= major constraint, 0= no constraint

10. CKM Deliverables Ranking

11. CKM High Level Deliverables 4= high priority, 0= no priority

12. CKM Big Projects Ranking

13. CKM Big Projects 4= high priority, 0= no priority

14. CKM Small Projects Ranking

15. CKM Small Projects 4= high priority, 0= no priority

16. Reflections We focused more on engagement, awareness and collaboration irrespective of our individual focusses We clarified some terms ‘ curation’, ‘engagement’ what they mean/include For some projects/locations- their focus may remain different eg. Publishing for SE Asia rather than for the whole of CKM How did the discussion go? We came to consensus more than we thought