1. Raymond S. Pastore, Ph.D.

3.  What is multimedia?  Verbal and Non Verbal representations better for learning than just one (Mayer, 2005)  Modality effect  Audio and visual representations are recommended for instructional delivery (Low & Sweller, 2005)  This reduces the cognitive load placed on the learner by allowing them to focus on the image and listen to the narration at the same time.  Split attention principle - When learners split their attention between text and visuals, they are increasing cognitive load because they are trying to integrate two sources of information that are required for comprehension.

4. But we care about….  Rapid  Fastest  Cheapest (cost effective)  Time Savings  Training?

5. Research Problem

6.  Recent research has revealed that audio can be compressed up to a certain point and still support high level learning (Pastore, 2009)  What is Time Compressed Speech? (Orr & Friedman, 1967)  The act of changing the tempo while preserving the pitch and retaining quality Invariant timing hypothesis (Honing, 2007). This hypothesis states that one cannot distinguish between the quality of audio when there is a tempo change (within normal wpm ranges and up to a certain point of compression).  Pastore (2009) revealed that spoken words could be digitally time- compressed up to 25% in a multimedia environment while preserving complex learning.  Thus, a one-hour multimedia session could take 45 minutes if time- compressed 25% and still maintain the same level of learner comprehension.

7. Research Problem  Redundancy Principle  Would time-compressed speech be more effective if text was provided?  This goes against redundancy principle  Current research has revealed a possible reversal effect associated with time-compressed instruction on factual knowledge (Ritzhaupt, Gomes, & Barron, 2008).  The reversal effect suggests that groups who received redundant representations outperformed groups who received non-redundant representations.  At this time however, no research has examined time- compressed instruction and redundancy on high-level learning objectives.

8.  The purpose of this study was to examine  1) the effects of time-compressed instruction on learning complex material in a multimedia environment  2) the redundancy principle on complex material in a multimedia environment and  3) the impacts of cognitive load on both time-compression and redundancy in a multimedia environment.

9. Methodology  Participants - 154 University Students (61 males/93 females)  Instruction  2,000-word script - based on the physiology and function of the human heart and its parts (Dwyer, 1965)  19 Simple line drawings  Audio Narration  Audio Compression  Audacity  WSOLA

10.  Design - 2x3 Experimental Design  Independent Variables -  Redundant and Non-redundant  Compressed Instruction - 0%, 25%, 50% 0% Compression25% Compression50% Compressionn Redundant25272577 Non- Redundant 25 2777 n5052 154

11. - Demographics Survey - Pre-Test - Dependent Variables:  Post Tests -  Identification - measures students’ understanding of factual knowledge  Comprehension - measures students’ understanding of problem solving  Cognitive Load – direct subjective measure given immediately after treatment  Time-on-Task  Review Behaviors - Back and Replay Buttons

12. Methodology – Sample without text

13. Methodology –redundant text

14. Methodology - Treatments Compression Percentage - Time TimeWords Per Minute 0%12:10164 25%9:08219 50%6:05328

15. Methodology - Procedure  University Computer lab – Mac lab  Each student had their own headphones/computer station.  They were given a CD with treatment and directions. Study took 45-60 minutes to complete  Introduction to study, demographics survey, pre-test, treatment, DVs

16. Findings  Prior knowledge (2x3 ANOVA) - No differences  Posttest Measures (2x3 MANOVA)  Redundancy  Non-Redundant (11.78) > Redundant (9.17) – factual  Non-Redundant (8.34) > Redundant (7.04) – Problem solving  *numbers indicate means; out of 20 points.  Compression (Tukey’s HSD for post hoc)  0% (11.82) = 25% (11.02) > 50% (8.63) - factual  0% (8.84) = 25% (8.25) > 50% (6.02) - Problem solving  *numbers indicate means; out of 20 points.  Cognitive Load (2x3 ANOVA)  Redundant (3.83) = Non-redundant (3.48)  0% (3.09) = 25% (3.36) > 50% (4.68)  *numbers indicate means; out of 7 points; 7 highest load.  Time On Task (2x3 ANOVA): 0% < 25% < 50%  Review Behaviors Load (2x3 ANOVA): No significant differences among groups

17. Conclusions and Recommendations  The results of both the low (factual) and high (problem solving) level learning tasks in this study revealed that multimedia instruction can be compressed up to 25% without sacrificing learning.  Computer based training should use compressed narration (where appropriate) to take advantage of the speed associated with reading as well as the modality effect  This could translate to significant financial savings when a one-hour computer based training session is reduced to only 45 minutes, which would accumulate more time saved by each employee who completes it

18. Conclusions and Recommendations  Implementation would be most significant during large-scale training efforts where hundreds or thousands of employees are training at one time.  Essentially there is a large return on investment when choosing to use this technology  Compressing audio takes very little time and effort, thus, it should not significantly impact development time and should not increase development costs as compression can be done using free software

19. Future Research  How it applies to others types of media (i.e., mobile)  Prior Knowledge  Preferences  Redundancy – limited text

20. Follow up study  What speeds do students prefer?  Students given samples of multimedia and just audio and asked the following:  Would you prefer this for learning? Lectures? Books? Entertainment? Etc. and asked to rate on 7 point scale.  Students taught how to do time compression and surveyed.

21. Questions?  Ray Pastore: rayme.pastore@gmail.comrayme.pastore@gmail.com  Website and blog: raypastore.com  Presentation: http://raypastore.com/wordpress/2011/11/ae ct-time-compression-presentation/ http://raypastore.com/wordpress/2011/11/ae ct-time-compression-presentation/  Paper citation:  Pastore, R. (2012). The effects of time- compressed instruction and redundancy on learning and learners’ perceptions of cognitive load. Computers & Education, 58(1), 641-651.