Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFrederica Wilkerson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Nutrition and Food Services Department Child growth charts e-learning tool Judith Myers and Kay Gibbons October 2011
2
Nutrition and Food Services Department Session outline n Re-cap child growth and growth charts n New equipment guidelines n Practice examples – WHO under 2; CDC over 2 n Introduce e-learning tool
3
Nutrition and Food Services Department Child Growth = marker of health and development n Quick, non-invasive techniques n Plotting serial measurements on charts n Abnormal growth can indicate underlying health or developmental problems
4
Nutrition and Food Services Department ‘Normal’ growth n Weight and length ‘tracking’ on centiles Growth influenced by: n Genetics and epigenetics n Ethnicity n Birthweight n Nutrition n Environment
5
Nutrition and Food Services Department Birth to 2 years To nearest 0.1cm Weight to nearest 10g purpose‘infantometer’ to nearest 0.1cm
6
Nutrition and Food Services Department 2 & 3 ½ years Portable or fixed ‘for purpose’ To 100g / 0.1cm
7
Nutrition and Food Services Department Use of Growth charts Individuals Growth monitoring Growth failure or excessive growth Impact of illness and response to treatment Screening NHMRC, 2002, NHMRC 2003, Cochrane, (Panpanich) 1999, deOnis 2006, WHO 1995. Garza 2006, NHMRC 2011 Population reporting NHMRC, 2002
8
Nutrition and Food Services Department KAS growth measures and charts n KAS Visits* n Birth – 2 years Weight, length and head circumference Plotting on WHO charts n 2 – 5 years Weight and stature at KAS visits BMI when indicated Plotting on CDC charts * And whenever clinically indicated
9
Nutrition and Food Services Department Charts in the Victorian ‘My health and development’ record GirlsBoysCentiles 0 – 24 monthsWHOHead circ Weight for age Length for age Head circ. Weight for age Length for age 5 th – 98 th 2 – 18 yearsCDCWeight for age Height (stature) for age BMI for age Weight for age Height (stature) for age BMI for age 5 th – 98 th 5 th – 98 th (includes 85 th and 95 th centiles)
10
Nutrition and Food Services Department Birth to 2 years World Health Organisation (WHO) http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/en/
11
Nutrition and Food Services Department Effect of ethnicity on infant growth Onis et al. WHO child growth standards. ActaPaed 2006
12
Nutrition and Food Services Department 2 – 5 years CDC (Centre for Disease Control) http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/
13
Nutrition and Food Services Department Differences plotting 0 - 2 n Head circumference matches closely at all key ages n Birth weight position is similar on CDC or WHO at all centiles n Length pattern matches closely, but by 2 years, WHO appear slightly ‘taller’ in the lower centile range n At 6 months, infants plotted on WHO appear ‘lighter’ when compared with CDC n At 2 years, children in lower centiles appear ‘heavier’ on WHO compared with CDC
14
Nutrition and Food Services Department Summary of differences: WHO compared to CDC charts n More children 6 months - 2 years appear to grow slower n More children could be ‘overweight’ n More children < 6 months ‘underweight’ n More risk of ‘poor growth’ 2 – 4 months = breastfeeding
15
Nutrition and Food Services Department Principles of child growth assessment n Serial measurements of both weight and length / stature n Head circumference reflects early brain growth n Poor growth – decline in rate of weight gain first, followed by length/height gain n Appropriate growth when weight and length/height track along a curve – even it is ‘off’ chart n Correct for prematurity until 2 years
16
Nutrition and Food Services Department n ‘Flags’ Weight or length / stature < 5 th centile Weight or length /stature > 98 th centile BMI > 85 th centile n Further investigate Unexplained weight loss Weight not regained following acute illness Weight or length stature ‘plateau’ Weight, length / stature or BMI increasing or decreasing centiles
17
Nutrition and Food Services Department Measure and Plotting n 2 week check Birth weight is plotted at age ‘0’ (37+ weeks) If more than 10% below birth weight at 2 weeks need to assess Weight change = current – birth (g) % weight loss = weight loss ÷ birth weight x 100% n Pre-term Pre-term charts used until expected birth date ( Kitchen 1983) ‘Correct’ until 2 years (KAS framework 2009)
18
Nutrition and Food Services Department Measure and plotting 2 years Weigh on either infant, platform scale or with parent/ carer Measure height (stature) or recumbent length depending on child Plot stature on CDC chart (length on WHO) Plot on both if concerned Child may appear ‘lighter’ transferring from WHO to CDC – this is normal Child will appear ‘taller’ transferring from WHO to CDC – this is normal
19
Nutrition and Food Services Department How do key KAS growth points compare? Question
20
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 1: Boy weight for age CDC (left) and WHO (right) at 4 months
21
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 1: Boy weight for age CDC (left) and WHO (right) at 4 months
22
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 2: Boys weight for age: CDC (left) and WHO (right) at 2 years
23
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 2: Boys weight for age: CDC (left) and WHO (right) at 2 years
24
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 2: Boys weight for age: WHO (left) and CDC (right) at 2 years
25
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 3: Boys length for age at 2 – WHO (left) and CDC (right)
26
Nutrition and Food Services Department Does changing to WHO make any difference to children’s growth assessment? Question
27
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 4: ?underweight or normal WHO (left) and CDC (right)
28
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 4: ?underweight or normal WHO (left) and CDC (right)
29
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 5: underweight or normal?
30
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 5: underweight or normal?
31
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 6: normal or overweight?
32
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 6: normal or overweight?
33
Nutrition and Food Services Department Comparison 6: normal or overweight?
34
Nutrition and Food Services Department
35
18.4 kg/m2 >85 th centile = ‘overweight’
36
Nutrition and Food Services Department Summary of key points n Chart changes don’t change individual child growth n Stick to one chart n Don’t rely on one measurement n Trend is more important than a single measurement n Need accurate measuring and plotting n Need calibrated, high quality equipment n Despite many parents’ perceptions the 50 th percentile is not the goal for each child
37
Nutrition and Food Services Department Key references n www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/ www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/ n www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/en www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/en n http://consultations.nhmrc.gov.au/open_public_cons ultations/public-consultation-draf http://consultations.nhmrc.gov.au/open_public_cons ultations/public-consultation-draf n Cole TJ. BMI cut-offs BMJ 2007 n Garza C. New growth standards for the 21 st century 2006 n de Onis. Comparison of the WHO and CDC growth charts 2007
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.