Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Break-Out Session Probation Part II. Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders: Technology, Evidence, and Implications for Community Supervision.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Break-Out Session Probation Part II. Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders: Technology, Evidence, and Implications for Community Supervision."— Presentation transcript:

1 Break-Out Session Probation Part II

2 Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders: Technology, Evidence, and Implications for Community Supervision American Probation and Parole Association Offender Supervision with Electronic Technology: A User’s Guide, 2nd Edition Sex Offender Community Based Supervision: Case Management Strategies and Tools

3 Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders [cont.] Technology Rapidly evolving Legislation = active GPS Technology offers one more tool Combined with others Means to end = structured containment Not the end Provides WINDOW into offender’s life

4 Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders [cont.] Many electronic tools for sex offenders Technology –Radio frequency –Location tracking –Computer monitoring and forensics –Crime and GPS data integration –Polygraph –Others

5 Radio Frequency: Martha Stewart’s Model

6 Radio Frequency

7 Radio Frequency [cont.] Home arrest Curfew monitoring Judge Love (Albuquerque, NM) 1983 –By 1990 in 50 states –Several countries Repairs False positives of violations

8 Radio Frequency [cont.] Drive-by units Random calling –Identity verification –Slow scan photos –Electronic voice analysis –Remote alcohol detection (late 1980s)

9 Location Tracking

10 Location Tracking [cont.] Late 1990s Cellular Technology 24 Satellites U.S. Department of Defense Active and Passive Exclusion Zones Workload Differences Liability Legislation Electronic Alibi

11 Location Tracking [cont.]

12 Polygraph and More

13 Polygraph and More [cont.]

14 Where’s the Evidence? Does electronic monitoring work? Does electronic monitoring reduce recidivism? Does electronic monitoring improve case management? How do we know?

15 Where’s the Evidence? [cont.] Little research - weak methodologies Mixed results –Better for some populations –Differences across types of offenders What is purpose of electronic monitoring? –Punishment? –Accountability? –Behavior change?

16 Where’s the Evidence? [cont.] Not a FIX –Electronic Monitoring does not replace OFFICER –ONE Tool Incorporated with other TOOLS Create highly structured CONTAINMENT

17 Evidence [cont.] Finn and Muirhead Steves (2002) –High-risk male parolees –Electronic monitoring showed no impact after four years –Sex offenders on electronic monitoring Less likely to return to prison Longer survival in community

18 Evidence [cont.] Bonta, Wallace-Capretta, & Rooney (2000) –Electronic Monitoring + Treatment –LOWER recidivism for high-risk –No effect on lower risk Match offender to interventions Low-risk in high-risk setting More recidivism

19 Evidence [cont.] Padgett, Bales, & Blomberg –75,661 (RF and GPS) Electronic monitoring of offenders in the community may prove an effective public safety alternative to prison

20 Evidence [cont.] Revocation for technical violation –RF = 95.7% less likely –GPS = 90.2% less likely –SO = slightly less likely Absconding –RF = 91.2% less likely –GPS = 90.2% less likely –SO = 42% less likely

21 Evidence [cont.] Revocation for new crime –RF = 95% less likely –GPS = 95% less likely –SO = 44.8% less likely

22 Implications

23 Implications [cont.] Consider workload –Repairs and malfunctions –Responding to alerts Consider liability –Active GPS –Constant information –Must process information

24 Implications [cont.] Consider offender type –Location tracking = high-risk sex offender –Curfew monitoring = lower-risk offenders Consider cost –RF = $1.97 –Active GPS = $8.97 –Prison = $51.22

25 Implications [cont.] Improve performance –Short-term management –Treatment completion No behavior change –Lack long-term –Lack cognitive-behavioral adjustment

26 Implications [cont.] Integrate TOOLS –Not a panacea –Highly structured = external control Containment of offender’s life –Overall strategy of ACCOUNTABILITY Legislation –Mandating active GPS

27 Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders Contact Information: Matthew T. DeMichele Research Associate American Probation and Parole Association c/o The Council of State Governments 2760 Research Park Drive Lexington, Kentucky 40578-1910 859-244-8123 (phone) 859-244-8001 (fax) mdemichele@csg.org

28 Questions and Comments


Download ppt "Break-Out Session Probation Part II. Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders: Technology, Evidence, and Implications for Community Supervision."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google