1. Nonprofit Status, Sustainability Leadership Next Generation September 15, 2009

2. Core Purpose Strengthen Nonprofits Core Values Sustainable Strategic Collaborative Native, non-Native, rural and urban

3. ISER Study

4. Key Findings Total sector expenditures $3.4 billion, –$2.4 expenditures in charitable organizations Sector employs 11% of workforce; –50% in rural Alaska (compared to 7% nationally) Alaska nonprofits more dependent on government funding Alaska nonprofits more dependent on corporate and foundation giving Individual Alaskans contribute below national norm, especially those making the most

5. Alaska Nonprofit Sector: Unofficial Count OFFICIAL COUNT……………………4,765 TOTAL OPERATING IN ALASKA……6,000

6. Alaska Nonprofit Sector: Major Types Reporting Public Charities & Funding Intermediaries (501c3) Member Serving Nonprofits—Other (501c6 and others) Civic Leagues and Social Welfare Orgs (501c4) 27 Categories of nonprofits in IRS Code

7. Reporting Public Charities: Expenditures of $2.4 Billion Larger public serving and service providing 501c3 nonprofits that can accept tax-deductible contributions  Health  Social Services  Civic  Education  Arts/Culture

8. Largest Charitable Organizations Providence ANTHC YKHC Banner Health South Central Foundation TCC SEARCH Central Peninsula Health Maniliaq Norton Sound Health Valley Health Salvation Army

9. National Nonprofit Sector: 501c3 Income Sources

10. Alaska Nonprofit Sector: 501c3 Income Sources

11. Compared USAK

12. Nonprofit Sector: Total US Private Giving Distribution of Private Giving Nationally About 36% of giving by individuals goes to religious organizations.

13. Nonprofit Sector: Total US/AK Private Giving US-$260 Billion –Corporate5% –Foundation12% –Individual83% Alaska-$240 Million –Corporate20%+ BP 5% ConocoPhillips 5%+ Others?10% –Foundation20%+ Rasmuson12% Others? 8% –Individuals60%

14. Alaska Nonprofit Sector: Individual Contributions Most Alaskans give, but slightly below national levels: –21% of Alaskans claim a charitable deduction, (IRS), compared to 30% nationwide, and A 2006 study ranks charitable giving comparing 50 states and the District of Columbia, individuals making $200,000 or more, Alaska ranks 51st!

15. Challenges Nonprofits represent almost ½ economy in rural Alaska, primarily federal funding Generational shifts, workforce shortage Non-sustainable revenue Perception that nonprofits need no “profit” Continued desire to start new nonprofits

16. Sustainability Board-staff balance –Functioning board –Competent staff Focus-no “mission drift” –Who you are –Where you’re going Collaboration- –Sticking to core competence, supporting others to stick to theirs Unrestricted Cash-manage cash flow and investment potential

17. Nonprofit Leadership

18. Nonprofit Staff Leader Profile Commitment to mission Technical skills to manage programs Staff and financial management skill MOST IMPORTANT –Must be able to work in partnership with board, share power.

19. Good to Great In Built to Last, Collins and Porras –" how did market leaders that maintained their dominance for more than fifty years do it?” Then, Collins for Good to Great –“how did average companies become great?”

20. Found Four Factors Disciplined People Disciplined Thought Disciplined Action Built to Last Focus Create great organizations!

21. Disciplined People Level V Leadership First Who, then What

22. First WHO, then what Hire the right people, not the right skills Work to get right people in right seats Once it is understood that someone is not the right person, with style, get them to leave. Learn from people mistakes.

23. Level 5 Leadership Leaders in most powerful seats are ambitious about the success of the organization, not themselves Leaders who praise others for success, look at self when things don’t work –Substance over style –Once decision is made, all team members support direction, even those who at one time disagreed.

24. Understands why boards matter Strong Board/ED partnership Selects right Board President Understands board member- demographics Uses Core Values as a tool Understands lifecycle of a nonprofit board Strives to be High Performing Board Board Leadership

25. Some truths about boards…

26. After analyzing data from 4,000 nonprofit boards across the country…”Effective governance by a board of trustees is a relatively rare and unnatural act.” Richard Chait, Thomas Holland and Barbara Taylor, Improving The Performance of Governing Boards, 1996, Phoenix:Oryx Press

27. 75% of boards didn’t know what to do Fewer than half had formal orientation Less than 30% had current board job description “Single biggest reason for why nonprofit boards are needed is that they impact nonprofit performance” William P. Ryan, Richard P. Chait and Barbara E. Taylor, “Problem Boards or Board Problems?” The Nonprofit Quarterly, 10 2 Summer 2003

28. Not very well 66% of board members rated their own board as only “somewhat effective” or “ineffective” The Nonprofit Governance Index, November 2000, a joint project of BoardSource and Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business Conclusion: How are boards doing?

29. Concern about the cause only motive for board service. Not branded to particular agency. Demands agency quality. Must have proven impact. Demands to make a difference. Time Time most important resource. Conclusion: The ‘new’ board member pool

30. Does your board look like these “new board members?” Are you making moves to be ready for this new board member? Can you see leadership qualities in your current or upcoming board President? Turn to Your Neighbor

31. Six Tools

32. Driven by passion, based on values Core values tied to leadership – and visa versa Values impact publics’ confidence, essential Ethical standards high Core Values used to make choices: people, programs, planning 1 st tool: Understanding that the Sector is “value-based”

33. Understanding the life cycle of your board is another tool to help you stay: –visionary and future focused; –take calculated risks; –lead to good communications; –be a systems thinker; –be creative in our problem solving; –stays values focused Can “depersonalize” situation Can lead to best practices for similar situations 2 nd Tool: Understanding the Life Cycles of Boards

34. Not all organizations will get there Is not a linear process There are some outward qualities to watch for Progression usually looks and feels like a see-saw going from one extreme to another before balance can either be seen or attained. Ultimately it is how it works and feels –Rater than a statement of fact 3 rd Tool: Striving to be High Performing Board

35. Lack of board support or board problems “first or second reason why nonprofit CEOs resigning in record numbers.” Timothy Wolfred, Leadership Lost: A Study on Executive Director Tenure, March 1999 Several studies showing boards are increasingly unhappy with their CEOs because they won’t share power and/or only want boards to fundraise 4 th Tool: Understanding The CEO- Board Relationship

36. 1.The agency’s mission 2.Core values for the organization 3.How to judge success for the agency and the CEO 4.Who should do what Different perceptions on 4 key points: Main reason boards and CEOs don’t get along

37. Keep the board focused on what matters most. Continue to define the board’s boundaries to the board- what is the board expected/not expected to do. Monitor board discussion and ensure that board meeting time is used effectively –create ad hoc committees to propose options to difficult issues. Ensure that no one board member is dominating board discussions- –work toward operating as a team. 6 th Tool: Understanding Board Chair Responsibilities

38. Group Exercise What other factors make great staff or board leaders?

39. BREAK!

40. Generational Shift

41. Generation Change Can’t hide from it Nonprofits will be challenged on the –staff level, –board –volunteer recruitment, –marketing –technological changes, and in –significant financial impacts.

42. Who Are We Talking About? “Greatest Generation”-Born 1901-1924 Thumbnail: Size: 20 million When working with this generation, emphasize: Tradition, helping others, being part of a large-scale, valuable change. “Silent Generation”: Born 1925-1945 Thumbnail: Size: 30 million When working with this generation, emphasize: Tradition, loyalty to a key issue in their lives, value of joint work ethic.

43. And… “ Boomer Generation”: Born 1946-62 Thumbnail: Size: 80 million:. When working with this generation, emphasize: Their value to the team, your need for them, their ability to improve your services, that your workplace is young and “cool.” Publicly recognize them whenever possible. Tell them that they can help “change the world” by working with you. “Generation X” Born 1963-1980 Thumbnail: Size: 45 Million. When working with this generation, emphasize: Their value to the work of the organization, the value of independent thinking, that your organization focuses on work-life balance.

44. And most recently… Gen@ or GenY or Millenials Born 1981-2002 Thumbnail: Size: 75 million When working with this generation, emphasize: The good that they and their peers can do by working with you, the challenge of doing good in the community and doing it well, the need for their new perspective and ideas.

45. Trends that Matter 1)Financial stress 2)Technological acceleration 3)Diversity of population 4)Redefining the family 5)MeBranding 6)Work-life balance

46. Trend One: Financial Stress First, there’s not enough money. What there is will trend toward the Boomers. –Not just Medicare/Medicaid, also withdrawal from 401K’s. And remember as we age, we vote more! And then, there’s the Federal Debt. Finally, financial stress on families and students (read: current and future employees) from the cost of higher education)

47. Trend Two: Tech Acceleration A reality, not up for debate. How you feel about tech acceleration is, in large part, defined by your generation. –Boomers see tech through bifocals: some good, some bad. –GenXers see it through tinted lenses: how can tech work for me? –Gen@?: They really don’t “see” tech at all-it’s invisible to them, like air. It’s always been there. And, like air, it’s part of their environment. –Remember this—it’s really important.

48. Trend Three: Diversity We’re in our fifth great wave of immigration. This is an issue in all parts of our country, urban- rural, coastal, central, north, south. We HAVE to be able to accommodate this diversity in our marketing, services, hiring and fundraising. Remember, it’s not just about language fluency. It’s about cultural knowledge, sensitivity and competence.

49. Trend Four: Redefining Family More Mobile: more spread out and more connected. In past generations, families moved, but they all moved together. Now, generations spread out. More “stepped”. “Blended” families are more and more ubiquitous, but have a different set of wants and needs than “traditional” families. More multi-racial. Sometimes from marriage, sometimes from adoption, multi-racial families are also increasingly common. And your organization doesn’t deal with families? Think again.

50. Trend Five: MeBranding Tried to buy plain tomato soup, regular yogurt, or non-herbal deodorant? It’s hard. Want to buy a shoe that only you have? You can. If I only listen to my music, hear my news, have my 6 adjective coffee, and never have to try a one- size fits all anything…it becomes all about me all the time. And nonprofits are all about other people. In addition, customer now expect at least SOME customization or accommodation of services. I call this MeBranding, and it has profound implications for nonprofits.

51. Trend Six: Work-Life Balance Boomers: “Live to Work!” GenX and Gen@: “Work to Live!” Don’t believe me? Draw the circles of “Work”, “Family”, and “Life” Have all the Boomers draw theirs and then all the GenX and Gen@ staff. Compare---and learn. Want to do something really scary? Draw your circles and then have your family draw your circles.

52. Work Life Test FAMILY LIFE TYPICAL BOOMER WORK LIFE FAMILY WORK TYPICAL GEN@

53. Final Words Generation change is the challenge of a lifetime for your nonprofit. Pay attention, and get started. If you wait too long, you could seriously impair your ability to do high quality mission for the next generation of mission-recipients. Good luck!