1. Electronic Eau Claire Conversation E2C2

2. Who is listening?   358 people have read Electronic Eau Claire Conversation.

3. Who is giving feedback?   68 people wrote or supported priorities.   That's 3.4 hours of public comment @ three minutes per priorities.

4. Age Demographics

7. Map District 1 = 10 responses District 2 = 9, District 3 =10 District 5 = 9, District 5 = 20 Outside of City = 9

13. Visitors to E2C2 67 participants (18.7%) 358 visitors Peak Democracy normal 10 – 15%

14. Satisfaction Survey  Yes = 56 (88%)  No = 6 (12%)

15. Satisfaction Survey All “no” comments   error in using 50 cents.   Site was difficult to navigate with iPad and iPhone; ended up having to enter information on desktop.   It was largely inaccessible to me as a blind computer user who reads with a screen reader.   It will get boring fast. I don't feel compelled to come back and use it again.   It doesn't break thins (sic) down into projects I may or may not agree with.

16. Satisfaction Survey Selected “yes” comments (17)   Very easy to navigate, allowed me to see percentage and make changes if I wanted.   It's nice to feel like you have a say. Hopefully it will matter.   It was user friendly and I felt like I had a say.