Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlisha Simmons Modified over 9 years ago
1
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 1 Jenn Willems USGS EROS Data Center Archive Advisory Committee October 20, 2004
2
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 2 Presentation Outline Policy and implementation background Implementation organization Progress in each area Next Steps
3
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 3 US Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy Policy signed by President Bush on April 25, 2003 Policy Goal: Advance and protect US national security and foreign policy interests by: Maintaining the Nation’s leadership in remote sensing space activities Sustaining and enhancing the US remote sensing industry Synopsis of Policy directive to US Government: Rely to the maximum practical extent on US commercial remote sensing space capabilities Focus Government systems on needs that are practically met commercially Develop long-term sustainable relationship with industry Provide timely/responsive environment for licensing operations of commercial remote sensing space systems Enable US industry to compete with foreign providers
4
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 4 Civil Implementation Background Civil agencies were tasked to write an implementation plan The implementation plan: Established a lead civil agency (USGS) Established interagency committees: Senior Steering Committee (SSC) at policy level Implementation working group (IWG) at operational level Designated agencies to share plan execution responsibilities and/or leverage capabilities where possible (USGS, NOAA, USDA, NGA, etc.)
5
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 5 Participating Agencies Department of Commerce Census Bureau National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Defense National Geospatial Intelligence Agency US Army Corps of Engineers Department of Energy Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management US Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service US Geological Survey Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Service Transportation Safety Administration US Coast Guard Department of State Department of Transportation Federal Geographic Data Committee National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Capital Planning Commission US Department of Agriculture US Forest Service Natural Resources Conservation Service Foreign Agricultural Service Farm Service Agency US Environmental Protection Agency
6
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 6 CRSSP Implementation Organization IWG Sub-teams
7
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 7 Near Term Requirements The policy specifically requires civil agencies to: “Determine which civil needs can be met by commercial remote sensing space capabilities; and Communicate current and projected needs to the commercial remote sensing space industry”
8
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 8 Requirements Process Near-term requirements objective - characterize and quantify agency remote sensing data requirements from current systems for: Industry planning Civil budget planning Identification of procurement opportunities Leveraging resources to facilitate new orders Long-term requirements objective – Characterize needs for future systems (NOAA)
9
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 9 Requirements Collection Survey given to all civil agencies Asked to describe projects for FY 04-06 Area of interest, sensor, spectral characteristics, resolution, cloud cover, application (i.e. mapping, monitoring, science research, regulatory, crop survey, etc.) 257 requirements were submitted 60% of civil agencies reported
10
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 10 Geographic Focus Areas The requirements process identified areas appearing to be exceptional in the number of times they were requested and/or their correspondence with a concentration of civil mission needs. Further analysis identified key regions where commercial remote sensing data would be of immediate use… Alaska Great Lakes Coastal and Border Areas Emergency Response
11
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 11 Infrastructure Requirements Status / Feedback Search and Order Tool Customer Service Library Imagery Available? NO YES CRSSP/CDP* Archive Order New CDP*Task Order Data Product Civil User NOTE: The CRSSP and *commercial data provider libraries encompass the following archives: CRSSP Library NGA Archive USGS Archive USDA Archive Other Commercial Data Provider Library Space Imaging Archive Digital Globe Archive OrbImage Archive
12
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 12 Commercial Data Access Add commercial satellite data to menu of USGS data/imagery holdings Landsats 1-5 & 7; Terra/ MODIS, ASTER; Aqua/MOVIS; NOAA/AVHRR; SPOT historical scenes; declassified U.S. imagery; multitude of other DEM and other geospatial data sets Draw on decades of all-source civil imagery procurement, management and distribution Use experienced customer service to search, order, and redistribute data Complete initial infrastructure enhancements by March 2005 USGS has coordinated large requirements/procurements: USGS contracted for National 1-meter DOQ coverage (~$220M 1993- 02) Approximately 50% USGS funded, 50% reimbursable (Fed/State) USGS contracting for 1-ft imagery over US urban areas (~10M 2003- 2005)
13
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 13 Procurement Contracts signed late in FY04 with: Space Imaging, Digital Globe, ORBIMAGE. The contracts: Complement family of USGS geospatial services/imagery contracts Expand distribution rights including unrestricted and public domain Provide optimum terms and conditions for civil needs Customer services staff steeped in civil applications Over $1M purchased by agencies since August 2004 National Park Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Foreign Agriculture Service, Bureau of Land Management NPS largest collect; covering national parks in SE Alaska
14
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 14 Budget FY06 budget planning cycle was already well along SSC considered initiative ideas that pooled requirements around several key needs (Alaska, etc.) Internal agency review and approval processes were out of phase with the FY06 budget cycle Ideas will be reconsidered for potential addition to FY07 budget submissions
15
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 15 Civil/NGA Coordination Investigating options for replicating applicable ClearView data to populate CRSSP archive Define method of receiving new data updates Explore methods to compare unfunded requirements to NGA planned acquisitions Evaluating possible leverage of NGA infrastructure
16
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 16 Next Steps Continue to make use of requirements data: Examine/consolidate requirements for procurement opportunities Examine requirements for potential initiatives Field test new requirements collection system Implement system in Jan FY05 Validate our FY04 data with industry actuals Update FY05-06 Addition of FY07 requirements Synchronize requirements and budget processes Develop case studies that demonstrate satellite utility for major national needs such as emergency response Expose more users to satellite data by populating highly visible, user friendly civil archive Continue productive civil/NGA cooperation for commercial remote sensing
17
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 17 Back-up Slides
18
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 18 Improving Short-term Requirements Process Improvements slated: Implement web-based interface tool for data capture and reporting Automate data input into controlled fields Automate analysis and GIS display tools Dynamic update of requirements Clarify requirements scope Involve any additional agencies Send out new GIS specialist to help agencies submit and validate requirements
19
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 19 Alaska Alaska lags behind other states in completeness and currency of its base mapping Most available data does not meet National Map Accuracy Standards Its size, remoteness and capricious weather hampers conventional mapping Alaska’s infrastructure is isolated and widely distributed
20
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 20 Floods, Avalanche,Earthquakes
21
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 21 Industrial Disasters, Oil Spills
22
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 22 Wildfires
23
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 23 Key Alaska Needs Critical targets .5 – 2.5 meter high resolution orthoimagery - core infrastructure 2.5 – 5.0 meter lower resolution orthoimagery – federal interest areas Core infrastructure includes cities, towns, villages, roads, pipeline, ports and energy producing and development areas Shared interest among multiple agencies and organizations for Alaska Data Key areas of use include: Aviation Safety, Disaster Response, Homeland Security, Land Transfer, Public Safety, Environmental Research, Resource Assessment, Community & Economic Development
24
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 24 Great Lakes Regional Needs: Better Emergency Preparedness Imagery to enhance existing oil/toxic spill response mapping Minimize disaster losses / increase response timing / efficiencies Improve Public Health Protect water intakes from threats Fewer beach closures Enhance Ecological Protection / Restoration Monitor wetland changes caused by encroachment and invasives Protect Endangered Species Sensitive near shore habitats
25
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 25 Great Lakes Partners Interest high for sharing high resolution satellite imagery between federal, state, tribal and local agencies and Non governmental organizations (NGOs): Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) - Coast Guard, Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Border Patrol, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) US Dept. of Agriculture (USDA) – Farm Service Agency (FSA), National Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), Forest Service (FS), Crop Insurance Dept. of Interior (DOI) – National Park Service (NPS), US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), US Geological Survey (USGS) Dept. of Transportation (DOT) – Federal Highway Administration (FHA) Dept. of Defense (DOD) – US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)- International Joint Commission (IJC) States, counties and cities Tribes Ducks Unlimited, The Nature Conservancy Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Great Lakes Observing System (GLOS) is coordinating remote sensing requirements
26
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 26 Great Lakes Partners Universities Minnesota University of Minnesota - Duluth Wisconsin U of WI – Madison and Milwaukee Michigan Michigan State University Central Michigan University Ohio Ohio State University of Toledo New York State University of New York – Buffalo Cornell Research and development for production of value-added products
27
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 27 Great Lakes Priority Needs Option 1 – “Comprehensive Coverage” Option 2 – “Special Monitoring”
28
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 28 Coastal & Border Areas US Coast Guard National Defense Missions General Defense Operations Maritime Interception Operations Military Environmental Response Operations Port Operations, Security, and Defense Coastal Sea Control Operations Peacetime Military Engagement Polar Icebreaking
29
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 29 55 Military & Economically Important Ports Mobile, AL Anchorage, AK * Valdez, AK * Los Angeles/Long Beach, CA * SFO/Oakland/Richmond, CA Port Hueneme, CA San Diego, CA (JHOC developing) New Haven, CT New London, CT Wilmington, DE Panama City & Port St. Joe, FL Pensacola, FL Tampa/Port Manatee, FL West Palm Beach, FL Miami & Port Everglades, FL Port Canaveral, FL Jacksonville, FL Kings Bay, GA Savannah, GA Guam Honolulu, HI Pearl Harbor, HI Chicago, IL Louisville, KY Baton Rouge, LA Lake Charles, LA New Orleans/Port of South, LA Morgan City, LA Boston, MA Baltimore, MD Portland, ME Detroit, MI Duluth/Superior, MI St Louis, MO Pascagoula, MS Morehead City, NC Wilmington & MOT Sunny Pt, NC Portsmouth, NH Buffalo, NY New York/New Jersey Cincinnati, OH Cleveland, OH Toledo, OH Portland, OR Pittsburgh, PA Philadelphia, PA San Juan, PR Providence, RI Charleston, SC Memphis, TN Corpus Christi, TX Port Arthur/Beaumont, TX * Galveston/TX City/Freeport, TX * Houston, TX * Norfolk/Newport News, VA (JHOC) * Seattle/Tacoma, WA Vancouver, WA Huntington, WV * Only active inport surveillance capability tracking commercial vessels over 300 GT
30
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 30 Familiarization/Visualization
31
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 31 Infrastructure Assessments Utilities –Power Plants –Water/Sewage Treatment Road Networks Power Networks Water Treatment Plant Road Pipeline Imagery backdrop for GIS databases Imagery supports creation of detailed site diagrams of facilities. Images courtesy of DigitalGlobe
32
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 32 Safety Applications Event Modeling –Determine Potential Areas Affected –Help Plan for Different Types/Levels of Response –Crisis Support Prevailing Winds Agent Release Point Event + 9 Hours Event + 7 Hours Event + 5 Hours Event + 3 Hours Event + 1 Hour Image courtesy of DigitalGlobe
33
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 33 Border Control
34
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 34 Disaster Response
35
Attachment F Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy (CRSSP) 35 Requirements Infrastructure Assessments Utilities Power Plants Water/Sewage Facilities Road Networks Power Networks Safety Applications Event Modeling Determine potential areas affected Help plan for varying levels of response Crisis support
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.