Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNeal Harris Modified over 9 years ago
1
Detergent update David Gleeson Moorepark Milk Quality Workshop 2011
2
Introduction Detergent product list Cleaning system experiments at Moorepark Operational costs of different cleaning systems
3
Detergent lists Product lists updated for Mar 2011 –Moorepark website-PDF format (www.teagasc. ie ) link-research & innovation/dairy) –Separate table for liquid caustic only products –List: 41 liquid detergent sterilizer & 8 liquid detergent products, 25 powder products (5 contain chlorine) & 12 liquid sterilizer products –7 brands reformulated with higher spec –Only 32% of liquid detergent-sterilizer or sterilizer products are registered with DAFF (Jan/11) – PCS number-new column –(www.pcs.agriculture.gov.ie/biocidalproductregisterJanuary2011.pdf
4
Important points in relation to detergent sterilizers A minimum of 800 ppm in the working solution is suggested for detergent sterilizers where the product is recycled and when hot wash is not used at each milking –Most popular washing system used in Ireland (e.g. 10% caustic @ 360mls/45 litres = 800 ppm or 18% caustic @200 mls/45 litres =800 ppm) or 18% caustic @200 mls/45 litres =800 ppm) Detergents with a lower working solution (< 800ppm) should give satisfactory cleaning when used with hot water daily and not recycled Increasing the usage rate of detergent-sterilizer products to achieve higher caustic levels may result in non- acceptable levels of chlorine in the working solution Acceptable chlorine levels in the working solution may range between 150 and 320 ppm depending on water temp (e.g. 3.5% chlorine@ 360mls/45L =280 ppm (e.g. 3.5% chlorine@ 360mls/45L =280 ppm or 4.% chlorine @ 360 mls/45L =320 ppm) or 4.% chlorine @ 360 mls/45L =320 ppm)
5
Chemical analyses of detergents Caustic range for detergent-sterilizers: –< 1 to 19 % –59% of products with caustic levels below 10% Chlorine range: –<1 to 9.5% –34% above 4.0%
6
Important points in relation to powder detergent products A number of powder products contain acceptable levels of chlorine (20%) Working solutions for cold caustic cleaning greater than 2000ppm are recommended – lower WS when chlorine is present (800PPM) A small number of powder products are recommended to be used as hot wash only (these may also be used at lower working solutions) Some products contain high levels of sodium carbonate while other products contain high levels of non caustic alkaline detergents which have additional cleaning benefits. The usage rates of caustic only powder products may be increased to increase the working solution It is considered that all powder products analysed contain adequate caustic levels
7
Caustic content in liquid detergent products on the Irish market (March, 2011) Product % Caustic w/wW.S* Hot wash W.S* Cold Wash Timac CIP 28.0817472496 P3-mip CIP 27.718482772 Multisan CF** 25.416952542 Parlosan NC** 24.316232704 Quantum x L 22.3558X Alkadex Forte 20.61028X Hypral SP 15.91059x Sanagard10.5524x * Working solutions are calculated based on manufactures recommended usage rates and % caustic measured in products ●** The addition of hydrogen peroxide to these products is recommended by manufacturers
8
Cleaning systems trial 7 washing systems evaluated 3 week period on each of 3 farms (June –Nov) Auto-washer calibrated for each product No re-cycling of detergent for second daily wash Measurements included –TBC (n=1,800) & Thermodurics(n=800) for milk line & bulk tank milk –TCM for milk line – Bacterial swabbing: start of wk 1 and end of wk 3 claw pieces liners stainless steel
9
Cleaning systems evaluated PRODUCTW.SCausticppmWater temp temp Usage rate mls/45L Add. product Once wk AcidDescale 1P3-mipCIP2,772cold450weekly 2P3-mipCIP1,848hot300chlorineweekly 3P3-mipCIP2,772Cold/hot450daily 4 Hypral SP 1,059hot300weekly 5 Liquid Gold 797hot250weekly 6 Multisan CF 2,542cold450 hydrogen peroxide weekly 7 Parlosan NC 2,704cold500 hydrogen peroxide weekly
10
Summary of results Treatment TBC(average)Thermodurics(average) Tank TBC (24hr) (average) Tank Thermodurics (average) P3-mipCIP cold 2,181(410-6700)92(0-2,700)14,247161 P3-mipCIP hot/chlorine 2,166(190-7,200)67(0-790)12,81469 P3-mipCIP-cold acid- hot 1,252(180-3,500)39(0-360)6,85659 Hypral SP hot 2,173(110-7,100)112(0-790)8,165140 Liquid Gold hot 2,010(210-4,300)90(0-610)5,86486 Multisan CF cold/hp 1,956(400-6,300)104(0-2,600)11,437252 Parlosan NC cold/hp 2,019(230-9,400)123(0-720)13,635205
11
Bacterial numbers on milk liners and stainless steel Low bacterial numbers observed on stainless steel & milk liners No significant difference for any washing system at wk 3 compared to wk 1 SS, wk1= 100cfu, wk3= 200cfu Liners, wk1=100cfu, wk3= 140cfu
12
Increase in bacterial numbers observed on ‘plastic’ from week 1 to week 3 Week 1Week 3sig P3-mipCIP- cold 13,00039,000< 0.01 P3-mipCIP- hot/chlorine 7,20027,500< 0.05 P3-mipCIP- acid 17,00016,500NS Hypral SP- cold 52,00070,000NS Liquid Gold- hot 17,00045,000NS Multisan CF- cold 34,00074,000< 0.05 Parlosan NC- cold 59,000280,000< 0.01
13
Thermoduric category 010-20>20-40 50- 200 >200 No of samples 174246308282137 Average Thermoduric count 0102895521 TBC1,4631,7692,0342,2492,378 Relationship between Thermoduric count and TBC Milk samples taken during milking (no bulk tank samples included)
14
Treatment PPM-Chlorine in wash solution TCM TCM P3-mipCIP cold 00.000 P3-mipCIP hot/chlorine 00.000 P3-mipCIP acid 00.000 Hydral/hot 00.000 Liquid Gold/hot 2110.000 Multisan CF/cold/p 00.000 Parlosan NC/cold/p 00.000
15
Cost of cleaning products PRODUCT Price of product used in calculations used in calculationslitres Descaler5825 P3-mipCIP29.9520 Boost/blast12.55 Hypral SP 6822 Liquid Gold 37.5020 Multisan2920 Parlosan3020 Chloras2125 ESB€/litreNight-rate0.017 Day-rate0.0087 Source; John Upton Cost of products may vary depending on the source and may be lower if large quantities are purchased
16
Weekly costs (€) per unit associated with 9 washing systems detergent chlorine Hydrogen peroxide Descale Acid Hot water (night Rate) Total cost 10 units Lactation (NR) Total cost 10 units Lactation (DR) P3mipCIP P3mipCIP cold 1.890.000.240.08950 982 P3mipCIP P3mipCIP hot/ch 1.260.030.241.101128 1578 P3mipCIP P3mipCIP acid 0.940.001.700.551372 1597 Hypral SP/hot 2.040.000.241.101452 1902 Liquid Gold/hot 1.050.000.241.101028 1477 Multisan CF/c/p 1.830.070.240.16990 1054 Parlosan NC/c/p 2.100.070.240.161104 1168 LiquidGold/h/c 1.440.000.240.63993 1250 Liquid gold/h/rec 0.660.000.240.63658 915
17
Discussion All cleaning systems gave satisfactory cleaning performance when used as recommended for the period tested-longer test time may be necessary New cold cleaning systems more expensive than existing Teagasc recommended cleaning system (NR,10 units, year €658 v €1014) Cold wash systems have similar running costs as twice-daily hot detergent sterilizer systems if using NR ( 10 units, year €1014 v € 1028) Lowest TBC & Thermoduric levels observed with daily hot acid wash PM -but at a cost ! (NR, 10 units, year, €658 v €1372) Could reduce the usage rate of some detergent sterilizers if products have a high caustic content and if using hot water and not re-cyling solution
18
Conclusions Increased occasions of acid cleaning and hot water usage had the biggest impact on TBC & Thermodurics Cleaning systems had no impact on TCM when used correctly Cold wash systems –Longer term evaluation –Recycling of product not evaluated Caution- Caustic only cold wash systems require contact time to be effective – suitability for bulk tank cleaning?
19
Future cleaning system studies Evaluation of re-cycling liquid hot/cold wash detergent-sterilizers and detergent only cleaning solutions on TBC, Thermodurics & TCM residues Evaluation of using disinfectant products like peracetic acid in the final rinse water
20
Thank You Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.