Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElinor Gordon Modified over 9 years ago
2
Nuclear Fusion The Possibility
3
Introduction “Every time you look up at the sky, every one of those points of light is a reminder that fusion power is extractable from hydrogen and other light elements” -Carl Sagan, 1991
4
The Future of Fusion While renewables may be the “energy source of tomorrow,” fusion will likely be needed for “the day after tomorrow”
6
Overview Fusion will solve future energy shortfalls Viable fusion power plants will solve pollution problems Investment in fusion research and development will set the stage for future energy independence U.S. involvement in International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) will aid development of fusion technology
7
The Problems Enormous monetary investment Possibility of failure
8
Conclusion The answer is fusion –Although the monetary investment involved is daunting the future benefits of establishing fusion as a viable power source for the U.S. and the world rise far above the obstacles that stand in the way
9
Why Fusion? Problems with current energy producing fuels It is hypothesized that by 2050 we will have run out of economically recoverable fossil fuels
10
Coal Abundant Burns dirty Causes acid rain and air pollution –Greenhouse gas problems
11
Oil Flexible fuel source with many derivatives Transportable Finite supply Causes air pollution
12
Natural Gas Burns cleanly Transportable Finite supply Dangerous to handle
13
Growing Population
14
No More Fossil Fuel? Need For New Energy Sources If we continue to burn fossil fuels for energy, they will only last another few hundred years. This means that an energy shortfall could occur within the next fifty years.
15
Nuclear Power Clean No CO2 No immediate pollution Problems with waste disposal Safety concerns
16
Other Alternative Sources Water Power Solar Power Tidal Power Wind Power Geothermal Power 20% of the energy needed for an estimated world population of 10 Billion in 2050
17
An Answer Nuclear Fusion
18
Our Sun
19
Fusion Advantages Abundant fuel, available to all nations –Deuterium and lithium easily available for thousands of years Environmental Advantages –No carbon emissions, short-lived radioactivity Modest land usage –Compact relative to solar, wind and biomass Can’t blow up –Resistant to terrorist attack –Less than 5 minutes of fuel in the chamber Not subject to daily, seasonal or regional weather variation –No large-scale energy storage nor long-distance transmission Can produce electricity and hydrogen –Compliments other nearer-term energy sources
20
Fusion Disadvantages Huge research and development costs Radioactivity
21
Background Fusion Basics
22
Basic Physics
23
Energy-Releasing Reactions ChemicalFissionFusion Sample Reaction C + O 2 -> CO 2 n + U-235 -> Ba-143 + Kr-91 + 2 n H-2 + H-3 -> He-4 + n Typical Inputs (to Power Plant) Bituminous Coal UO 2 (3% U-235 + 97% U-238)Deuterium & Lithium Typical Reaction Temp. (K) 700100010 8 Energy Released per kg of Fuel (J/kg) 3.3 x 10 7 2.1 x 10 12 3.4 x 10 14
24
What is an atom?
25
Nuclear Power Nuclear fission –Where heavy atoms, such as uranium, are split apart releasing energy that holds the atom together Nuclear fusion –Where light atoms, such as hydrogen, are joined together to release energy
26
States of Matter Plasma is sometimes referred to as the fourth state of matter
27
Plasma makes up the sun and the stars
28
Plasma Atoms In plasma the electrons are stripped away from the nucleus Like charges repel –Examples of plasma on earth: Fluorescent lights Lightning Aurorae Neon signs
29
Typical Plasmas Interstellar Solar Corona Thermonuclear Laser Air Density
30
Characteristics of Typical Plasmas
31
Basic Characteristics Particles are charged Conducts electricity Can be constrained magnetically
32
Fusion Fuel Tritium Deuterium
33
The fuel of fusion
34
Inexhaustible Energy Supply Deuterium –Constitutes a small percentage of the hydrogen in water Separated by electrolysis 1 barrel (42 gallons) water = ¾ oz. D = 32,000 gallons of oil Tritium –n + Li T + He –Lithium is plentiful Earth’s crust Oceans –Savannah, Georgia –Canada, Europe, Japan
35
Fusion Fuel: Deuterium
36
Other Possible Fusion Fuels Helium-3 Nuclear Fusion Proton NeutronProton
37
Where is Helium-3? Helium-3 comes to us from the sun on the solar wind It cannot penetrate the magnetic field around the earth, so it eventually lands on the moon One shuttle load- 25 tons- would supply the U.S. with enough fuel for one year –China
38
HOW FUSION REACTIONS WORK
39
E=mc 2 Einstein’s equation that equates energy and mass –E= energy –M= mass –C= speed of light (3 x 10 8 m/sec) Example: –energy from one raisin = 10,000 tons of TNT
40
Two Main Types of Fusion Reactions: P-P "P-P": Solar Fusion Chain
41
Two Main Types of Fusion Reactions: D-T D + T => He-4 + n
42
More on Fusion Reactions
44
An enormous payoff The fraction of “lost” mass when H fuses into He is 38 parts out of 10,000 This lost mass is converted into energy The energy released from 1 gram of DT = the energy from about 2400 gallons of oil
46
The result Inexhaustible fuel source –Seawater & Lithium The MOST “bang for your buck” Inexpensive to produce Widely distributed fuel source –No wars No pollution –Helium is not polluting Fuel that is non-radioactive –Residue Helium-4 is non-radioactive Waste reduction
47
More on Fusion Radioactivity Aneutronic Fusion Fuels –More costly –Not enough science yet Neutronic Fusion Fuels –D-T Reaction Most of the neutrons are absorbed into a lithium blanket which is then used to replace the tritium fuel Stray tritium atoms The Reactor Structure
48
More of Fusion Radioactivity Stray Tritium –Relatively benign Doesn’t emit strong radioactivity when it decays –So only dangerous when ingested or inhaled Shows up in one’s body as water –Easily and frequently flushed out Half-life of 12 years –No long-term waste problem –Won’t decay while in one’s body –Less than natural exposure to radon, cosmic rays and much less than man-made x-rays
49
More on Fusion Radioactivity Reactor Structure –Development of special “low-activation” structural materials Vanadium Silicon-carbide –Wait ten to fifteen years after shutdown The reactor will be less radioactive than some natural materials (particularly uranium ores) Recycle into a new fusion reactor
50
Waste Reduction Power Source Total Waste (m3) High-Level RAD Waste Coal 10,000 (ashes) 0 Fission 440 120 Fusion: Today’s Materials 2000 30 Advanced Materials 2000 0
51
So why aren’t fusion plants already in operation? How fusion works and the obstacles in the way
52
The Problems Harnessing the Energy Achieving & sustaining high temperatures –The reaction takes place at a temperature hotter than the surface of the sun –0.1 seconds Containing the fuel & the reaction Money for research and development
53
Harnessing the Energy
54
Achieving ignition temperatures 45
55
Methods to Heat Deuterium- Tritium Fuel Compressing the Fuel Internal Electric Current Neutral Particles Microwaves Lasers X-rays [recent development]
56
Plasma Confinement & Heating Magnetic Electromagnetic Waves Ohmic Heating (by electric currents) Neutral Particle Beams (atomic hydrogen) Compression (by magnetic fields) Fusion Reactions (primarily D+T) Tokamak Schematic Laser-beam-driven Fusion Inertial Compression (implosion driven by laser or ion beams, or by X-rays from laser or ion beams) Fusion Reactions (primarily D+T) Gravity Compression (gravity) Fusion Reactions (such as the p-p chain) Stars & Galaxies
57
Inertial Confinement Fusion
58
Recent Developments: Sandia National Laboratories Two Purposes: –Weapons research –Pursue the ignition of fusion Z Accelerator (inertial confinement) –Wagon wheel-like design –Uses blasts of X-rays crashing into a hydrogen (deuterium) capsule at the center 200 trillion watts of x-rays (10 x electrical energy than entire generating capacity of the world) 15 million degrees centigrade –Likened to an internal combustion engine Cheaper than Tokamaks and Lasers
59
The Z Accelerator Challenges: A machine that can detonate controlled thermonuclear explosions and survive Timeline: electricity on a national grid in 35 years Dr. Stewart C. Prager, “It’s premature to judge which is the winner” Dr. Quintenz says, “We’re in the game” For More Information: The New York Times, April 8, 2003 “New Fusion Method Offers Hope of New Energy Source”
60
Fusion By Magnetic Confinement
63
Where are the Current major Fusion Energy Projects? JET from the European Community JT-60U in Japan NOVA at Lawrence Livermore Labs in California TFTR at PPL in Princeton, New Jersey DIII-D at General Atomics in San Diego, CA Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM
64
NOVA Machine- Inertial Confinement
65
TFTR is located at PPPL (Princeton, NJ)
66
DIII-D is located at General Atomics (San Diego, CA)
68
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) Cooperative Effort by European Union, Japan, U.S. and Russia First proposed in 1986 (Hopefully) Operational 2014 Magnetic confinement design concept
69
Energy Secretary Abraham Announces U.S. to Join Negotiations on Major International Fusion Project
70
ITER Design
71
To achieve extended burn in inductively driven plasmas with the ratio of fusion power to auxiliary heating power (Q) of at least 10 for a range of operating scenarios and with a duration sufficient to achieve stationary conditions on the timescales characteristic of plasma processes; To aim at demonstrating steady-state operation using non-inductive current drive with a ratio of fusion power to input power for current drive (Q) of at least 5. ITER Physics Design Principal Physics Goals
72
Issues still unresolved Site Selection Construction of components Timeline
73
Site Selection: Enter Politicians European Union –Cadarache, France –Vandellos, Spain Canada –Clarington (near Toronto) Japan –Rokkasho (northern tip of Honshu, the main island)
74
Financial Commitment Total Construction Costs= 5 Billion Total Operating Costs= 5.5 Billion (twenty years) Dismantling Costs= 450 million Countries offering to host the site –EU, Canada, Japan –20%-25% Countries offering to be full partners –Russia, China, U.S –10%
75
Component Construction Superconducting coils Plasma-heating system Vacuum pumps Cryogenics Diagnostic devices
76
Timeline May 20 & 21 –Negotiation session of ITER partners in Vienna End of 2003/early 2004 –Ratify an agreement amongst participating nations 2005-2006 –Construction begins –Ten years 2014 –Facility operational
77
Concluding Remarks “We definitely need more physics”
78
Concluding Remarks Fusion is possible Fusion will solve many environmental problems Fusion will solve political problems Fusion will solve future fuel needs Fusion is the answer
79
Questions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.