1. 2014 Tech Meeting Dan Fiser

2. 2  Crop: Potatoes  Location: Stockton Ca  Dates: –Harvesting: July 2,2014  Objective: Evaluation of Intracept  Treatments: #1) GSP #2) GSP + 1 pt on seed piece #3) GSP + 1pt on seed + 1pt foliar at tuber initiation #4) GSP + 1 pt foliar at tuber initiation Summary - The addition of Intracept at planting or at hooking or both did not improve overall number of tubers or total yield. However, Intracept treatments increased the number of Class “A” tubers which are the most valuable. Additionally the foliar application of Intracept at hooking reduced the number of low value class “C” tubers

3. 3  Trial : Intracept  Crop: potatoes Treatment and Rep # tube rs Weight (lb) Weight per tuber (lb) 1 - 1668.420.1276 1 – 2676.540.0976 1 – 3415.060.1234 1 – 4344.90.1441 Trt 1 mean526.230.1232 2 – 1626.10.0984 2 – 2445.860.1332 2 – 3524.90.0942 2 – 4535.360.1011 Trt 2 mean 52.7 5 5.550.1067 3 – 1394.460.1144 3 – 2465.540.1204 3 – 3475.080.1081 3 – 4586.540.1128 Trt 3 mean47.55.410.1139 4 – 1486.520.1358 4 – 2587.460.1286 4 – 3405.320.1330 4 - 4465.480.1191 Trt 4 mean486.1950.1291

4. 4  Crop: Potatoes  Location: Stockton Ca  Dates: –Harvesting: July 2,2014  Objective: Evaluation of Intracept  Treatments: #1) GSP #2) GSP + 1 pt on seed piece #3) GSP + 1pt on seed + 1pt foliar at tuber initiation #4) GSP + 1 pt foliar at tuber initiation Summary - The addition of Intracept at planting or at hooking or both did not improve overall number of tubers or total yield. However, Intracept treatments increased the number of Class “A” tubers which are the most valuable. Additionally the foliar application of Intracept at hooking reduced the number of low value class “C” tubers

5. 5  Crop: Cotton  Location: Tulare Lake Basin  Dates(If applicable): –Harvesting: –First pick only  Objective: Evaluation of Brandt Smart Trio® on cotton  Treatments:  1 qt Brandt Smart Trio + –4-28-14 –32oz Honcho + Intrepid –6-12-14 –Wrangler + Steward Brandt Smart Trio Results are within the 95% confidence level,however the treated replications on average yielded higher than the untreated. *Yield (lbs Lint/Acre) Rep 1Rep 2Rep 3Rep 4Rep 5Rep 6Rep 7Rep 8Average Smart Trio183217931850175618021828185417581809 Untreated179118001791174317911806182317951793

6. Steric K on Navel Oranges  Cooperator- Gar Tootelian, Dennis McFarlin  Applied thru micro sprinklers :  10 gpa 8-29-2014  10 gpa 9-12-2014  Pre treat tissue samples taken 8-27- 2014 Dec 2014Tech meeting 6  Treatments  #1) East Rep  #2) West rep  #3) GSP no additional K  Note : CAN 17 applied to all treatments

7. Steric K in Navel Oranges Treatment Area % Nitrogen% Phosphate% Potash Pre-appPost-appChangePre-appPost-appChangePre-appPost-appChang e Steric K - East2.942.97+0.030.13 0.000.970.99+0.02 Steric K - West2.762.82+0.060.130.14+0.011.461.25-0.21 Grower Stand.2.742.67-0.070.13 0.001.401.22-0.18 Dec 20142014 tech mtg 7 Treatment AreaPPM ZnPPM MnPPM B% Ca% MgPPM FePPM Cu Steric K - East89471455.10.4511423 Steric K - West92481665.290.4212720 Grower Stand.93461714.670.3912220 N-P-K Tissue Sample Results Secondary and Micronutrient Tissue Sample Results, Post-Application Treatments may have contributed to an increased uptake of N & Ca

8. 8  Crop: Oranges  Location: Orange Cove CA  Dates –Harvesting: November, 2104  Objective: Steric K on Navel Oranges  Treatments: #1) GSP #2) Rep #1 West #3) Rep #2 East Treatments show a positive effect on fruit size which may have contributed to a Diluted sugar content.

9. Thank you www.brandt.co