Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMargaretMargaret Miller Modified over 9 years ago
1
2010-03-19 Chart 1 Why Intermodal Traffic Volume in Germany (More Than) Doubled Within 10 Years! Rainer Mertel KombiConsult GmbH, Frankfurt am Main Email: rmertel@kombiconsult.comrmertel@kombiconsult.com MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS Conference on „Infrastructure Of Intermodal Transport“ Bratislava – 19 March 2010
2
2010-03-19 Chart 2 Budapest Bucuresti Beograd Sofia Istanbul Bratislava Ljubljana Wien Rotterdam Duisburg München Nürnberg Hannover Hamburg Bremen Thessaloniki A H RO GR BG TR IT D NL Köln Praha Triest SLO HR Zagreb SCG MK Antwerp B Skopje Project corridor CREAM Project FP6 project, co-financed by European Commission www.cream-project.eu
3
2010-03-19 Chart 3 Project objectives Achieve competitive rail freight and intermodal rail/road services on CREAM corridor by: Catching new freight markets such as temperature-controlled cargo for intermodal services by applying innovate technology Improving border crossing processes and enabling interoperable operations Developing quality management system(s) Enhancing data exchange and information flow Implementing efficient and customer-oriented rail operation schemes such as gateway/hub systems Upgrade intermodal terminals and management CREAM Project
4
2010-03-19 Chart 4 Unaccompanied intermodal rail/road traffic 1998-2008 Intermodal Traffic In Germany Source: Statistisches Bundesamt; KombiConsult calculations
5
2010-03-19 Chart 5 Unaccompanied intermodal barge/road traffic 1998-2008 Intermodal Traffic In Germany Source: Statistisches Bundesamt; KombiConsult calculations
6
2010-03-19 Chart 6 Why doubled intermodal traffic volume? Domestic traffic in Germany: implementation of block train systems shifting responsibility for service profiling and economic risks from railways to intermodal operators International traffic: extension of block train systems to virtually all corridors: Catching new European markets Faster, road-competitive services Cost-effective rail production: shuttle and gateway services Synchronized time-schedules Multiple daily departures Building European networks Improvement in rail infrastructure: loading gauge etc. Intermodal Traffic In Germany
7
2010-03-19 Chart 7 Why doubled intermodal traffic volume? Competition on rail traction services on domestic network since 2000, and on important international lanes such as the Brenner as of 2001: Cost control Service quality improvement Competition on intermodal operator level: Innovations in services, technologies and business models Tapping new freight market potentials Booming economy Growth of global container flows Intermodal Traffic In Germany
8
2010-03-19 Chart 8 Why doubled intermodal traffic volume? EU enlargement driving especially marine container traffic Improved cost competitiveness with road: Fuel cost increase Saturated truck capacities Limitations on truck drivers Restrictions on truck drivers’ working hours Massive enlargement of intermodal terminal capacities (not only) in Germany Intermodal Traffic In Germany
9
2010-03-19 Chart 9 4 categories of intermodal terminal investments Intermodal Terminal Investment Programme In Germany Ownership Financial sources / state subsidy 2007 share of total handling capacity (estimated) DB Netz Federal state (BSchwAG): 100% of eligible cost 24 % Private companies Federal state (FKV): up to 85% of eligible cost 56 % Private companies Various (regional funds, EU): 30-50 % of investment 15 % Private companies 100% privately financed 5 % Source: KombiConsult Since 1998 the overwhelming majority of investments has been implemented under the FKV funding regime.
10
2010-03-19 Chart 10 General information on Directive “FKV” First coming into effect: March 1998 Currently, the 4 th edition is being applied due to expire on 31 Dec 2011. Prerequisites for every renewal: Evaluation study (carried out by Hacon and KombiConsult) Notification by European Commission Germany is committed to promoting intermodal traffic only through the funding of the construction of terminals. There are no other instruments such as operational subsidies; discounts on fuel or infrastructure access fees; funding of intermodal equipment or information technology. Directive For Funding Intermodal Terminals
11
2010-03-19 Chart 11 Principles of funding Eligible beneficiaries: only private companies Terminal categories: rail/road; barge/road; trimodal facilities Measures: new terminals and enlargement measures Purpose: ensuring handling rate in line with market What’s funded: all items and facilities required for enabling the transhipment of intermodal units. Max. funding rate: 85% of eligible costs Directive For Funding Intermodal Terminals
12
2010-03-19 Chart 12 Principles of funding Prerequisites for funding: Private capital doesn’t ensure viability (10y business plan) Ensuring non-discriminatory access (public terminal) No cannibalization of existing terminals, also cross-border Public tendering of terminal management (investor may not hold more than 50% of shares of operating company) Public tendering of all investments Bank guarantee corresponding to funding amount Commitment to operate facility for 10/20 years Procedure: Application at any time (no call!) Formal application to federal authorities Directive For Funding Intermodal Terminals
13
2010-03-19 Chart 13 Impacts of directive Directive For Funding Intermodal Terminals Total subsidies 1998 – 2007: € 510 million Total handling capacity created: 3.6 million loading units Annual traffic shift effect (2006):34 million tonnes 2.1 million truckloads Environmental benefit (2006):€ 465 million
14
2010-03-19 Chart 14 Intermodal Traffic In Germany Germany’s terminal map 2008 Source: KombiConsult
15
2010-03-19 Chart 15 Intermodal Traffic In Germany
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.