1. Computer Architecture- 1 Ping-Liang Lai ( 賴秉樑 ) Chapter 1 Fundamentals of Computer Design Computer Architecture 計算機結構

2. Computer Architecture- 2 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

3. Computer Architecture- 3 1.1Introduction Old Conventional Wisdom: Power is free, Transistors expensive New Conventional Wisdom: “Power wall” Power expensive, Xtors free (Can put more on chip than can afford to turn on) Old CW: Sufficiently increasing Instruction Level Parallelism via compilers, innovation (Out-of-order, speculation, VLIW, …) New CW: “ILP wall” law of diminishing returns on more HW for ILP Old CW: Multiplies are slow, Memory access is fast New CW: “Memory wall” Memory slow, multiplies fast (200 clock cycles to DRAM memory, 4 clocks for multiply) Old CW: Uniprocessor performance 2X / 1.5 yrs New CW: Power Wall + ILP Wall + Memory Wall = Brick Wall  Uniprocessor performance now 2X / 5(?) yrs  Sea change in chip design: multiple “cores” (2X processors per chip / ~ 2 years) » More simpler processors are more power efficient

4. Computer Architecture- 4 Crossroads: Uniprocessor Performance VAX : 25%/year 1978 to 1986 RISC + x86: 52%/year 1986 to 2002 RISC + x86: ??%/year 2002 to present From Hennessy and Patterson, Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, 4th edition, October, 2006

5. Computer Architecture- 5 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

6. Computer Architecture- 6 1.2Classes of Computers Desktop Computing: optimize price-performance. Servers: provide larger-scale and more reliable file and computing services. Embedded Computers: real-time performance requirement. FeatureDesktopServerEmbedded Price of system $500-$5,000$5,000- $5,000,000 $10-$100,000 (including network routers at the high end) Price of microprocesso r module $50-$500 (per processor) $200-$10,000 (per processor) $0.01-$100 (per processor) Critical system design issues Price- performance, graphics performance Throughput, availability, scalability Price, power consumption, application-specific performance

7. Computer Architecture- 7 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

8. Computer Architecture- 8 Instruction Set Architecture: Critical Interface Properties of a good abstraction  Lasts through many generations (portability)  Used in many different ways (generality)  Provides convenient functionality to higher levels  Permits an efficient implementation at lower levels instruction set software hardware

9. Computer Architecture- 9 Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) ISA is the actual programmer-visible instruction set.  Class of ISA;  Memory addressing;  Addressing modes;  Types and sizes of operands;  Operations;  Control flow instructions;  Encoding on ISA.

10. Computer Architecture- 10 Organization, Hardware, and Architecture Organization: includes the high-level aspects of a computer’s design.  Memory system, the memory interconnect, and the design of the internal processor or CPU (arithmetic, logic, branching, and data transfer).  For example: AMD Opteron 64 and Intel P4 have same ISA, but they have different internal pipeline and cache organizations. Hardware: detailed logic design and the packaging technology.  For example, P4 and Mobile P4 have same ISA and organization, but they have different clock frequency and memory system. Architecture: covers all three aspects of computer design – instruction set architecture, organization, and hardware.  Designer must meet functional requirements as well as price, power, performance, and availability goals.

11. Computer Architecture- 11 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

12. Computer Architecture- 12 1.4Trends in Technology A successful new ISA may last decades, for example, IBM mainframe. Four critical technologies  Integrated circuit logic technology: transistor density increased by about 35% per year, quadrupling in somewhat over four years;  Semiconductor DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory): capacity increases by about 40% per year, doubling roughly every two years;  Magnetic disk technology: roller coaster of rates, disk are 50-100 times cheaper per bit than DRAM (chapter 6).  Network technology: network performance depends both on the performance of switches and transmission.

13. Computer Architecture- 13 Performance Trends: Bandwidth over Latency Bandwidth or throughput: the total amount of work done in a given time.  Such as megabyte per second for a disk transfer. Latency or response time: the time between the start and the completion of an event.  Such as milliseconds for a disk access.

14. Computer Architecture- 14 Scaling of Transistor Performance and Wires Feature size: the minimum size of a transistor or a wire in either the x or y dimension.  From 10 microns in 1971 to 0.09 microns (90 nm) in 2006;  The density of transistors increases quadratically with a linear decrease in feature size;  Transistor performance improves linearly with decreasing feature size;  Since improvement in transistor density, thus CPU move quickly from 4- bit to 8-bit, to 16-bit, to 32-bit microprocessors;  However, the signal delay for a wire increases in proportion to the production of its resistance and capacitance.

15. Computer Architecture- 15 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

16. Computer Architecture- 16 Power in IC (1/3) Power also provides challenges as devices are scaled.  Dynamic power (watts, W)in CMOS chip: the traditional dominant energy consumption has been in switching transistors.  For mobile devices: they care about battery life more than power, so energy is the proper metric, measured in joules: †In modern VLSI, the exact power measurement is the sum of, Power total =Power dynamic +Power static +Power leakage †Hence, lower voltage can reduce Power dynamic and Energy dynamic greatly. (In the past 20 years, supply voltage is from 5V down to 1V)

17. Computer Architecture- 17 Power in IC (2/3) Example 1 (p.22): Some microprocessor today are design to have adjustable voltage, so that a 15% reduction in voltage may result in a 15% reduction in frequency. What would be the impact on dynamic power? Answer Since the capacitance is unchanged, the answer is the ratios of the voltages and frequencies: thereby reducing power to about 60% of the original.

18. Computer Architecture- 18 Power in IC (3/3) As we move from one process to the next, (60 nm or 45 nm…)  Transistor switching and frequency ↑;  Capacitance and voltage ↓;  However, power consumption and energy ↑. Static power: an important issue because leakage current flows even when a transistor is off:  Thus, transistor ↑, power ↑;  Feature size ↓, power ↑ (why? You can find out in VLSI area).

19. Computer Architecture- 19 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

20. Computer Architecture- 20 Silicon Wafer and Dies Exponential cost decrease – technology basically the same:  A wafer is tested and chopped into dies that are packaged. Die ( 晶粒 ) Wafer ( 晶圓 ) AMD K8, source: http://www.amd.com dies along the edge

21. Computer Architecture- 21 Cost of an Integrated Circuit (IC) Today’s technology:   4.0, defect density 0.4 ~ 0.8 per cm 2 (A greater portion of the cost that varies between machines) (sensitive to die size) (# of dies along the edge)

22. Computer Architecture- 22 Examples of Cost of an IC Example 1 (p.22): Find the number of dies per 300 mm (30 cm) wafer for a die that is 1.5 cm on a side.  The total die area is 2.25 cm 2. Thus Example 2 (p.24): Find the die yield for dies that are 1.5 cm on a side and 1.0 cm on a side, assuming a defect density of 0.4 per cm 2 and α is 4.  The total die areas are 2.25 cm 2 and 1.00 cm 2. For the large die the yield is For the small die, it is

23. Computer Architecture- 23 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

24. Computer Architecture- 24 Response Time, Throughput, and Performance Response time ( 反應時間 ): the time between the start and the completion of an event – also referred to as execution time.  The computer user is interested. Throughput ( 流通量 ): the total amount of work done in a given time.  The administrator of a large data processing center may be interested. In comparing design alternatives,  The phrase “X is faster than Y” is used here to mean that the response time or execution time is lower on X than on Y.  In particular, “X is n times faster than Y” or “the throughput of X is n times higher than Y” will mean

25. Computer Architecture- 25 Performance Measuring Execution is the reciprocal of performance,

26. Computer Architecture- 26 Reliable Measure – User CPU Time Response time may include disk access, memory access, input/output activities, CPU event and operating system overhead – everything… In order to get an accurate measure of performance, we use CPU time instead of using response time. CPU time is the time the CPU spends computing a program and does not include time spent waiting for I/O or running other programs. CPU time can also be divided into user CPU time (program) and system CPU time (OS). Key in UNIX command time, we have, 90.7s 12.9s 2:39 65% (user CPU, system CPU, total response,%). In our performance measures, we use user CPU time – because of its independence on the OS and other factors.

27. Computer Architecture- 27 Outline 1.1Introduction 1.2Classes of Computers 1.3Defining Computer Architecture 1.4Trends in Technology 1.5Trends in Power in Integrated Circuits 1.6Trends in Cost 1.7Dependability 1.8Measuring, Reporting, and Summarizing Performance 1.9Quantitative Principles of Computer Design 1.10Putting It All Together: Performance and Price-Performance

28. Computer Architecture- 28 Four Useful Principles of CA Design Take advantage of parallelism  One most important methods for improving performance. » System level parallelism and Individual processor level parallelism. Principle of Locality  The properties of programs. » Temporal locality and Spatial locality. Focus on the common case  For power, resource allocation and performance. Amdahl’s law  “The performance improvement to be gained from using some faster mode of execution is limited by the fraction of the time the faster mode can be used.”

29. Computer Architecture- 29 Two Equations to Evaluate Alternatives Amdahl’s Law  The performance gain that can be obtained by improving some porting of a computer can be calculated using Amdahl’s Law.  Amdahl’s Law defines the speedup that can be gained by using a particular feature. The CPU Performance Equation  Essentially all computers are constructed using a clock running at a constant rate.  CPU time then can be expressed by the amount of clock cycles.

30. Computer Architecture- 30 Amdahl's Law (1/5) Speedup is the ratio  Alternatively,  Two major reasons of Speedup enhancement » Fraction enhanced : the fraction of the execution time in the original machine that can be converted to take advantage of the enhancement ( ≦ 1). » Speedup enhanced : the improvement gained by the enhanced execution mode ( ≧ 1). This fraction enhanced

31. Computer Architecture- 31 Amdahl's Law (2/5) Thus, Execution Time overall = the time of the unenhanced portion of the machine + the time spent using the enhancement, i.e. that is, ExTime old ExTime new This fraction enhanced

32. Computer Architecture- 32 Amdahl's Law (3/5) Example 3 (p.40): Suppose that we want to enhance the processor used for Web serving. The new processor is 10 times faster on computation in the Web serving application than the original processor. Assuming that the original processor is busy with computation 40% of the time and is waiting for I/O 60% of the time, what is the overall speedup gained by incorporating the enhancement? Answer Fraction enhanced = 0.4, Speedup enhanced = 10 †Amdahl ’ s Law can serve as a guide to how much an enhancement will improve performance and how to distribute resources to improve cost- performance.

33. Computer Architecture- 33 Amdahl's Law (4/5) Example 4 (p.40): A common transformation required in graphics processors is square root. Implementations of floating-point (FP) square root vary significantly in performance, especially among processors designed for graphics. Suppose FP square root (FPSOR) is responsible for 20% of the execution time of a critical graphics benchmark. One proposal is to enhance the FPSQR hardware and speed up this operation by a factor of 10. The other alternative is just to try to make all FP instructions in the graphics processor run faster by a factor of 1.6; FP instructions are responsible for half of the execution time for the application. The design team believes that they can make all FP instructions run 1.6 times faster with the same effort as required for the fast square root. Compare these two design alternatives. Answer We can compare these two alternatives by comparing the speedups: Improving the performance of the FP operations overall is slightly better because of the higher frequency.

34. Computer Architecture- 34 Amdahl's Law (5/5) Example 5 (p.41): The calculation of the failure rates of the disk subsystem was Therefore, the fraction of the failure rate that could be improved is 5 per million hours out of 23 for the whole system, or 0.22. Answer The reliability improvement would be Despite an impressive 4150X improvement in reliability of one module, from the system’s perspective, the change has a measurable but small benefit.

35. Computer Architecture- 35 CPU Performance (1/5) Essentially all computers are constructed using clock (all called ticks, clock ticks, clock periods, clocks, cycles, or clock cycles) running at a constant rate.  Clock rate: today in GHz  Clock cycle time: clock cycle time = 1/clock rate  Ex. 1 GHz clock rate = 1 ns cycle time Thus, the CPU time for a program can be expressed two ways: Or,

36. Computer Architecture- 36 CPU Performance (2/5) We can also count the number of instructions executed – the instruction path length or instruction count (IC). If we know the number of clock cycles and IC, then the average number of clock cycles per instruction (CPI). CPI is computed as Thus, clock cycles can be defined as IC × CPI, this allows us to use CPI in the execution time formula: †This figure provides insight into different styles of instruction sets and implementations.

37. Computer Architecture- 37 CPU Performance (3/5) The pieces fit together of CPU time A α% improvement in any one of three pieces leads to a α% improvement in CPU time.  Unfortunately, it is difficult to change one parameter in complete isolation form others, because the technologies of them are interdependent: » Clock cycle time: Hardware technology and organization; » CPI: Organization and instruction set architecture; » Instruction count: Instruction set architecture and compiler technology. †Processor performance is dependent upon three characteristics: instruction count, clock cycles per instruction and clock cycle (or rate). †Computer architecture is focus on CPI and IC parameters.

38. Computer Architecture- 38 CPU Performance (4/5) To calculate the number of total processor clock cycles as To express CPU time again  And overall CPI as IC i : the number of times instruction i is executed in a program. CPI i : the average number of clocks per instruction for instruction i. †IC i /IC presents the fraction of occurrences of that instruction in a program. †It is useful in designing the processor. Hint: CPI i should be measured because pipeline effects, cache misses, and any other memory system inefficiencies.

39. Computer Architecture- 39 CPU Performance (5/5) Example 6 (p.43): Suppose we have made the following measurements: Frequency of FP operations = 25%, Average CPI of FP operations =4.0, Average CPI of other instructions = 1.33, Frequency of FPSQR = 2%, CPI of FPSQR =20. Assume that the two design alternatives are to decrease the CPI of FPSQR to 2 or to decrease the average CPI of all FP operations to 2.5. Compare these two design alternatives using the processor performance equation. Answer First, observe that only the CPI changes; the clock rate and instruction count remain identical. We start by finding the original CPI with neither enhancement; We can compute the CPI for the enhanced FPSQR by subtracting the cycles saved from the original CPI:

40. Computer Architecture- 40 Amdahl's Law vs. CPU Performance CPU performance equation is better than Amdahl’s Law  Possible to measure the constituent parts;  To measure the fraction of execution time for which a set of instructions is responsible;  For an existing processor, to measure execution time and clock speed is easy;  The challenge lies in discovering the instruction count or the CPI. » Most new processors include counter for both instructions executed and for clock cycles.