Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMagdalen Watts Modified over 9 years ago
1
Keir Opie National Center for Transportation and Industrial Productivity (NCTIP) New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) Paramics North American User Group Meeting New Brunswick, NJ July 14, 2008 Cape May County Hurricane Evacuation And Elevation Study
2
Project Sponsor & Client Sponsored by: NJDOT Bureau of Research South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization Clients: New Jersey State Police, Office of Emergency Management NJDOT, Office of Emergency Management South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization Cape May County
3
Project Objectives Elevation Surveys: Conduct accurate GPS elevation surveys of county roadways that will feed into the NJ 47 / 347 Corridor Determine category of hurricane that will cause roadway inundation by storm surge Evacuation Simulations: Determine total evacuation times for the corridor Different lane reversal treatments Different evacuation demand and evacuee response scenarios
4
Background – Cape May County Southern peninsula of New Jersey Off-season population of 100,000 Peak-season daytime population of 1 million or more 4 Roads in and out (5 total lanes per direction)
5
Background – Cape May County Very low-lying terrain A hurricane strike on the area could cause storm surges that would inundate much of the county A major hurricane would force a mandatory evacuation of the entire county USACE SLOSH Flood Modeling
6
Background – Cape May County Density of Different Types of Housing
7
No FloodingCategory 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
8
Evacuation – Study Area NJ Route 47 / 347 highlighted in yellow Simulation study area shown in green Pink region is the secondary study area (external zones)
9
Evacuation – Scenario Constants Constant in all scenarios: Number of different types of housing units from household inventory in USACE HES, plus 2005 campground survey by NJIT Number of housing units vulnerable to inundation from different level of hurricanes from the USACE HES No day-trippers included in evacuation demands
10
Evacuation – Scenarios: Traffic Operations (3) Normal operations (No reversal) Police control overrides signal controls Reversal as currently planned (NJ 83 – NJ 55) Follows existing NJ 47 / 347 Reverse Lane Plan Extended Reversal (US 9 to NJ 55) New reversal section assumed to operate similar to current reversal plan Note: New Parameter in Extension Study
11
Evacuation – Scenarios: Area Population (2) Peak Season 100% Permanent Residents 100% Occupancy of Seasonal / Tourist Off-peak Season 100% Permanent Residents 50% Occupancy of Seasonal / Tourist In both cases: Household Inventory from USACE HES used to determine type and number of housing units in various inundation zones No day-trippers included in evacuation demands
12
Evacuation – Scenarios: Vehicle Demands (2) Census-based Vehicle Demands Data from Census 2000 used to estimate evacuating vehicles per housing unit Permanent and Seasonal Housing Units:1.54 veh/hh Hotel / Motel / Campground: 1.0 veh/hh Higher Estimate of Vehicle Demands Higher number of vehicles per household is assumed Permanent and Seasonal Housing Units:3.0 veh/hh Hotel / Motel / Campground:1.0 veh/hh Note: New Parameter in Extension Study
13
Evacuation – Scenarios: Routing Assumptions (2) Balanced NJ 47/347 and Other Corridors Routing Assumed balance of traffic between NJ 47/347 corridor and other corridors (US 9 / Parkway, NJ 50 / NJ 49) Manual assignment of traffic from each evacuation district to available evacuation corridors Heavy NJ 47/347 Corridor Routings All households south of NJ 83 forced into NJ 47/347 corridor All households north of NJ 83 use other corridors Note: New Parameter in Extension Study
14
Evacuation – Scenarios: Hurricane Intensity (2) Category 1 Hurricane Evacuation of category 1 inundation areas Additional volunteer evacuees from other inundation areas Category 2 (and up) Full scale evacuation of county Evacuation of category 4 inundation area
15
Evacuation – Scenarios: Behavior Response (3) Hourly vehicle rate of departing evacuees calculated from behavioral response curves (Sigmoid or S-Curves) Fast Response Rate (approx. loading time 12 hours) Medium Response Rate (approx. loading time 18 hours) Slow Response Rate (approx. loading time 24 hours)
16
Evacuation – Analysis Scenarios Parameters Traffic Operations 3 Area Populationx 2 Vehicle Demandsx 2 Routing Assumptionsx 2 Hurricane Intensityx 2 Behavior Response x 3 Total Scenarios144
17
Evacuation – Scenarios for Paramics Files Scenario Parameters Traffic OperationsNetwork Structure Area Population Vehicle Demands Routing Assumptions Hurricane Intensity Behavior Response Profile Demands File
18
Evacuation – Total Vehicle Demands Census Based Vehicles, Balanced Routing Census Based Vehicles, Heavy NJ 47 Routing Higher Estimate of Vehicles, Balanced Routing Higher Estimate of Vehicles, Heavy NJ 47 Routing
19
Paramics Network 450 miles of roadway Just under half of county’s roadways Centered along a 30-mile stretch of the NJ 47/347 corridor Approximation of Police Officer override of signals
20
Multi-day Simulation in Paramics Some evacuations would take more than 24 hours One simulation run for each 24-hr period Data to be passed to the next day Queued traffic on the roadways Snapshots taken at end of first sim period (23:59:59) Queued traffic in zones Releases Counts file counts blockages and releases (calculate queue)
21
Multi-day Simulation in Paramics Next Day Demands Scheduled releases Matrix 1, hourly profile releases Snapshot loads vehicles en-route Loaded at time 0:00 In-zone queue traffic Matrix 2, profile releases all in first 10 minutes of sim period Run for 24 hours sim period Process next 24-hour period (if needed)
22
Multi-day Simulation in Paramics Multiple Iterations Day 1: Processor runs 5 iterations of each assignment Day 2: Modeller run (one iteration for each of day 1 iterations) Day 3: Modeller run (if needed) Many Runs 144 Scenarios needed nearly 1500 individual 24-hour long simulations
23
Scenarios: Evacuation Times Total Evacuation Times (in hours): Ranges from 16 to 89 hours
24
Scenarios: Lane Reversal Savings Shortening of Evacuation Times vs. No Reversal (in hours):
25
Effects of Lane Reversals - Example Hours after Call for Evacuation Cumulative Percentage of Vehicle evacuated via NJ 47/347 Corridor
26
Study Conclusions Total evacuation time ranges from 16 to 89 hours (from time of call to evacuate) Current lane reversal has very limited benefits Most traffic assumed to enter NJ 47/347 corridor south of NJ 83 Current lane reversal plan will not help this bottleneck Extending the current lane reversal plan further south will help remove this bottleneck In order to best utilize the existing plan, some traffic must be diverted from points south of NJ 83 to use US 9/GSP to NJ 83 to access the contraflow section
27
Modeling Conclusions Paramics can be used to simulate multi-day events Some data loss is seen moving between days Delays of vehicles unreleased from zones Beneficial aspects of simulation in evacuation assessment Detailed vehicle flow modeling in contraflow lanes Detailed queue analysis for extensive queues Addition of a multi-day profile would make multi-day simulation much easier
28
Thanks & Contact Information Keir Opie Manager, Simulation & Modeling NCTIP / IITC New Jersey Institute of Technology University Heights Newark, NJ 07102 eopie@njit.edu ph.973.596.5259 fx.973.596.6454 www.transportation.njit.edu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.