Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Expanded file -- July 2, 2003 1 ARB – Exhaust Emissions – Tier 3 Small Off-Road Engine Workshop – Expanded file EMA / OPEI Engine Manufacturers Association.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Expanded file -- July 2, 2003 1 ARB – Exhaust Emissions – Tier 3 Small Off-Road Engine Workshop – Expanded file EMA / OPEI Engine Manufacturers Association."— Presentation transcript:

1 Expanded file -- July 2, 2003 1 ARB – Exhaust Emissions – Tier 3 Small Off-Road Engine Workshop – Expanded file EMA / OPEI Engine Manufacturers Association / Outdoor Power Equipment Institute Clean Air Act Committee

2 Expanded file -- July 2, 20032 ARB – Exhaust Emissions – Tier 3 Production Catalyst Systems –Small Off-Road Engine experience ARB Test Program –Southwest Research Institute High Efficiency Catalysts –Thermal energy management

3 Expanded file -- July 2, 20033 Small Off-Road Engine -Production Catalyst Systems International Catalyst System – B&S –Quantum & Mod. 9/10 Side valve 1.3 in 3 ceramic -or- wire mesh substrate 10-15% Engine Displacement –20-30% HC+NOx Efficiency (0 hrs) 2-3 g/hp-hr (minimum) –10-15% CO Efficiency (0 hrs) Tier I Carburetor calibration (moderate CO levels) 50 g/hp-hr CO conversion (maximum) Limited secondary air / controlled heat release –International Market Product Feature

4 Expanded file -- July 2, 20034

5 5

6 6 Small Off-Road Engine -Production Catalyst Systems Tecumseh TVM220 21.8 in 3 Vertical L-Head Certified EPA Phase II 4.2 in 3 Reducing Catalyst / 19% Engine Displacement 15% HC+NOx Efficiency at 0 Hours Tecumseh H35 9.5 in 3 Horizontal L-Head Certfied EPA Phase I, CARB Tier II 4.2 in 3 Reducing Catalyst / 44% Engine Displacement 29% HC+NOx Efficiency at 0 Hours

7 Expanded file -- July 2, 20037 Small Off-Road Engine -Production Catalyst Systems Emission Sentry System - Kohler –Automotive type system 12.2 in 3 substrate / 50% of Engine displacement LPG application 3-way catalyst loading –Full Engine control unit Closed-loop feedback fuel control O 2 sensor –Low CO levels / High NO x reductions –Low volume production –High-end commercial market

8 Expanded file -- July 2, 20038 ARB / SwRI Test Program Emission Strategies –Enleanment (2 of 5 engines) Modified to improve catalyst efficiency - SwRI Increased NOx / Reduced HC Engine performance/durability concerns –Secondary Air (all 5 engines) Needed to achieve target HC reductions - SwRI Increased CO% efficiency / energy release 40 to 60% CO conversion (4 of 5 engines) B&S Intek #2 - 29% CO converted @ 0 hrs.

9 Expanded file -- July 2, 20039 ARB / SwRI Test Program Emission Strategies –Large Metallic Catalyst substrates (4 of 5 engines) ensured substrate mechanical/emission durability 75% to more than 185% of engine displacement Removed all sound reduction and cooling chamber capacity => “Catalyst container” per SwRI – Honda GCV160 retained cooling B&S Intek #2 - 32% of engine displacement catalyst

10 Expanded file -- July 2, 200310 ARB / SwRI Test Program Emission Strategies –Remote mounted containers (3 of 5 engines) Provided “package space” for Secondary Air Reduced engine/ catalyst temperature interaction –Reduced catalyst system temperatures pre-catalyst, substrate mid-bed, container surface & exhaust temperatures Reduced vibration interaction – system durability Both B&S Inteks close mounted

11 Expanded file -- July 2, 200311 Catalyst Secondary Air – % CO reductions

12 Expanded file -- July 2, 200312 Catalyst Secondary Air – % CO reductions

13 Expanded file -- July 2, 200313 Catalyst Secondary Air – % CO reductions Engine Description HC + NOx %CO%Exhaust Temp Surface Temp 1 – Honda. Stock 8.79293850-424570-350 Cat J w/o secondary air 5.9233%24127%Temps Not Recorded 504-304Remote Mounting Cat J with secondary air 2.5171%10863%763-418685-465 2 B&S Intek 2. Stock 9.45307815-385618-352 Cat L w/o secondary air 6.7029%26912%799-548580-441 Cat L with secondary air 4.0857%21829%846-596568-407Thermo- couple ?

14 Expanded file -- July 2, 200314 Catalyst Secondary Air – % CO reductions Engine Description HC + NOx %CO%Exhaust Temp Surface Temp 3 –Tecumseh. Stock 7.58361Temps not Recorded Cat C w/o secondary air 3.9348%19745%842-450765-591Remote Mounting Cat C with secondary air 2.7963%16953%964-550810-668 3 –Tecumseh. Stock 9.93397916-490871-607Stock Temps @ 250 hrs. Cat C with secondary air 3.7662%24040%956-625884-750Remote Mounting

15 Expanded file -- July 2, 200315 Catalyst Secondary Air – % CO reductions Engine Description HC + NOx%CO%Exhaust Temp Surface Temp 4 –Kawasaki. Stock 7.45 5.51+1.94 380847-408Temps not Recorded Cat E w/o secondary air 4.8235%26430%1040-560649-427 Tier 3 Jet secondary air 7.43 3.55+3.89 0%22641%524-330Temps not Recorded Thermo- couple ? Cat E with secondary air 2.8961%10653% vs 226 1110-623468-397Thermo- couple ? 4 - Kawasaki. Stock 6.70 5.59+0.81 422749-380480-307Stock Temps @ 125 hrs. Tier 3 Jet secondary air 7.93 3.77+4.16 -18%19953%808-364553-362Enleanment = Temp rise Cat E with secondary air 1.4582%12338%1080-683725-538Temps vs. 0 hrs.

16 Expanded file -- July 2, 200316 SwRI – Briggs & Stratton Intek #1 Emission Strategies –Enleanment - A/F Ratio modified Performance and Durability concerns –Passive Secondary Air Injection Increased HC and CO efficiency Increased Thermal energy release –9.0 in 3 Substrate = 75% of displacement Replaced Stock Muffler with SLT Optional Muffler Removed sound/cooling chambers Catalyst “container” only

17 Expanded file -- July 2, 200317

18 Expanded file -- July 2, 200318

19 Expanded file -- July 2, 200319

20 Expanded file -- July 2, 200320 SwRI – B&S Intek Catalyst System

21 Expanded file -- July 2, 200321 SwRI – B&S Intek Catalyst System

22 Expanded file -- July 2, 200322 SwRI – Tecumseh OVRM120 Emission Strategies –No Enleanment Engine close to recommended Temperature limits –Passive Secondary Air Injection Increased HC and CO efficiency Increased Thermal energy release –9.0 in 3 Substrate = 75% of engine displacement Replaced Stock Muffler with Briggs & Stratton SLT Optional Intek Muffler Removed sound/cooling chambers Catalyst “container” only Location modified away from engine to allow room for passive air system

23 Expanded file -- July 2, 200323

24 Expanded file -- July 2, 200324

25 Expanded file -- July 2, 200325

26 Expanded file -- July 2, 200326 SwRI – Honda GCV160 Emission Strategies –No Enleanment Manufacturer concerns with startability –Passive Secondary Air Injection Increased HC and CO efficiency Increased Thermal energy release –9.0 in 3 Substrate = 92% of engine displacement Increased muffler/container size 2 times Removed sound reduction capability Catalyst “container” with mixing/cooling chambers Location modified away from engine to allow room for passive air system

27 Expanded file -- July 2, 200327 SwRI – Honda GCV160

28 Expanded file -- July 2, 200328

29 Expanded file -- July 2, 200329

30 Expanded file -- July 2, 200330

31 Expanded file -- July 2, 200331 SwRI – Honda GCV160

32 Expanded file -- July 2, 200332 SwRI –Honda GCV160

33 Expanded file -- July 2, 200333 SwRI – Kawasaki FH601V (V-Twin) Emission Strategies –Enleanment – A/F Ratio modified Engine sensitive to intake air temp/humidity –Passive Secondary Air Injection Increased HC and CO efficiency Increased Thermal energy release –77 in 3 Substrate =190% of engine displacement Removed sound reduction capability Catalyst “container” with mixing/cooling chambers Location modified away from engine to allow room for passive air system

34 Expanded file -- July 2, 200334 SwRI –Kawasaki Catalyst

35 Expanded file -- July 2, 200335

36 Expanded file -- July 2, 200336

37 Expanded file -- July 2, 200337

38 Expanded file -- July 2, 200338 SwRI – Briggs & Stratton Intek #2 Emission Strategies –No Enleanment –Passive Secondary Air Injection Increased HC and CO efficiency Increased Thermal energy release –3.7 in 3 Substrate = 31% of engine displacement Replaced Stock Muffler with SLT Optional Muffler Removed sound/cooling chambers Catalyst “container” only Baseline vs. Developed –New Baseline vs. Oct ’02 – Increased HC –Potential Fuel/Oil contamination

39 Expanded file -- July 2, 200339

40 Expanded file -- July 2, 200340

41 Expanded file -- July 2, 200341

42 Expanded file -- July 2, 200342 Ignition Time vs. Temp – selected Forest Fuels U.S Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service TempMaterialTimeNoted Effect 518°FPunky Wood5 min. Smoke, Glowing, Combustion 518°FCheat Grass5 min. Substantial Browning 572°FCheat Grass3 min. Smoke 518°FSawdust10 min. Smoke & Browning

43 Expanded file -- July 2, 200343 Catalyst Application - SORE Reference Ignition Temp, Gasoline 850°FFire Protection Handbook, 14 th Edition Gasoline Ignition on Hot Surface, Open Air 1250°FAPI PSD 2216, 1980 Max Exposed Surface Temp, Combustion 550°FU.S.D.A. Forest Service, SAE J335 Max Exhaust Gas Temp, Combustion 475°FU.S.D.A. Forest Service, SAE J335 Max Exposed Surface Temp, Skin Burns 175°FDIN Standards, B&S

44 Expanded file -- July 2, 200344 Catalyst Application – Small Off-Road Engines Safe & Functional Design Criteria Increased Temperatures –Exhaust gas & surface “Over-Rich” conditions –Choke, primers, dirty air cleaners Field Application concerns –Temperatures, Fuel spillage, Debris V-twin & High Inertia applications –Additional Problems

45 Expanded file -- July 2, 200345 Catalyst Application - Performance System durability w/application –High % Class 2 sold w/o mufflers –“Best-in-Class” vs. Mass Market Catalyst durability/reliability –Thermal Failures Sintering, Melting, Loosening –Poisoning Metallic Oil additives

46 Expanded file -- July 2, 200346 Catalyst Application – Other Major Issues Application Concerns –Increased package size, shielding, weight –Increased development / qualification to ensure compliance – Emissions & Safety –Reduced reliability & Increased variability ( 2 systems => engine/catalyst ) –OEM “Add-on” – Certification & audit –Increased costs – component & equipment

47 Expanded file -- July 2, 200347 Catalyst Application – Cost Impact High conversion efficiency will require new engines (new tooling) –Current average engine-out levels in production must be met by nearly all production units if high-efficiency converters are to perform according to design –Thermal management for safety and engine durability Other impacts –Equipment manufacturers –California consumers and businesses

48 Expanded file -- July 2, 200348 ARB – Exhaust Emissions – Tier 3 High HC+NOx conversion efficiency catalysts are not possible without high CO conversion efficiency.  Thermal Management Engine & Equipment manufacturers cannot meet standards based on high conversion efficiency without major engine and equipment modifications –New tooling for most lawn & garden engines    not an add-on package.


Download ppt "Expanded file -- July 2, 2003 1 ARB – Exhaust Emissions – Tier 3 Small Off-Road Engine Workshop – Expanded file EMA / OPEI Engine Manufacturers Association."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google