1. Overview of California’s Accreditation Process Year-Out Pre-Visit Webinar Very Small Institution (1-2 programs) Site Visits Spring 2012 Ensuring Educator Excellence

2. Agenda Overview Steps in the Site Visit Process Planning Program Assessment, Biennial Reports Common Standards Narrative Interview Schedule Two-Month Pre-Visit Site visit and post site visit Role of the Consultant 2

3. 3 Roles and Responsibilities in an Accreditation Site Visit Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) Committee on Accreditation (COA) Your Institution

4. 4 Focus of Accreditation Institution Education Unit as an entity Common Standards address institutional infrastructure and capacities Programs Individual Programs offered by institution Adopted Program Standards: PA reviews to assure that programs are still meeting the standards HO-Sample Org Structure (1)

5. What does Unit Mean for a Very Small Institution? What if we only have one program? Aren’t program and unit the same thing? What if we have more than one program, but limited faculty and instructional personnel, what is our unit? What if we have two programs but they don’t have anything in common? 5

6. A Pictorial Approach to Unit Assessment 6

7. Multiple Subject OR Induction Fertilizer Water Transportability Rancher Yield Tractor THE UNIT 7

8. Multiple Subject OR Induction Fieldwork Institution Provides Resources THE UNIT 8

9. Comparing Across the Unit A Matrix Approach to Unit Assessment 9

10. Fieldwork MS/SS or Induction Resources THE UNIT 3-Way Survey ? ? ? ? Programs 10

11. 11 Common Standards (2008) 1. 1. Educational Leadership 2. 2. Unit and Program Assessment and Evaluation 3. 3. Resources 4. 4. Faculty and Instructional Personnel 5. 5. Admission 6. 6. Advice and Assistance 7. 7. Field Experience and Clinical Practice 8. 8. District-Employed Supervisors 9. 9. Assessment of Candidate Competence

12. 12 Program Review Each credential program is reviewed through Program Assessment and by the site visit team CTC needs a FINAL Program Assessment document prior to the site visit Standard Options available to programs Adopted California Standards National or Professional Program Standards Experimental Program Standards—only if operating an approved Experimental Program HO: Program Review (2)

13. Accreditation Cycle Yr. 1 Yr. 2Yr. 3Yr. 4Yr. 5Yr. 6Yr. 7 Biennial Report Follow up to the site visit Site Visit Program Assessment Biennial Report 13 Collect and Analyze Data Annually

14. 14 Continuing Accreditation Visit Cycle   Consultant Assigned   Institutional Overview webcast: ~1 Year Prior   Preconditions Report: 6 mo. to 1 year prior   Team Structure: Team Leader, Team Members, and Program Clusters   Planning for the Team Visit   Accreditation Team Visit   Committee on Accreditation

15. Team Composition Size and structure of the team is negotiated between the institution and the Commission Team Lead (1) Common Standards Cluster (1-2) Program Sampling team members (1-2) CTC Consultants (1) Total individuals on the your visit will range from 4-6 15

16. Planning Team Approach Logistics CTC pays for transportation to the review, lodging, and meals for team members and consultants Program Specific Preparation Institution Preparation Checklists 16

17. Logistics Lodging Meals Develop and sign a contract with the CTC to get reimbursed for lodging and meal expenses for team members Plan for Transportation during the site visit For team members: hotel to campus and back 17 HO-Hotel-Meals planning (3-4)

18. 3-6 Month Out Phone Call Have all logistics information ready Hotel identified Lodging rate Team room rate Parking fee, if applicable Identify who at institution will sign the contract— 2 weeks to 1 month prior to the site visit Notify State Consultant if you need a phone conversation 6 months prior to visit 18

19. Presenting Evidence to the Team Electronically/Web pages: Organize by both Common Standards and approved program standards All documentation should be electronic whenever possible 19 HO-Site Visit Documentation (5)

20. 20 Preconditions Report Due six months to 1 year before the visit Report includes Characteristics of the Institution—including matrix of programs, number of candidates, and number of program completers Addresses all Preconditions*—General (state law and Commission Policy) and Program Specific * Includes evidence to support meeting the Preconditions HO-Preparing Preconditions Report (6-7)

21. Preconditions Report (cont.) Matrix of Approved Programs Report is reviewed by CTC Staff http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/STDS- preconditions.html 21

22. What Programs are Reviewed? All CTC Approved Educator Preparation Programs Teaching Credentials Services Credentials Certificate Programs, added authorizations All programs offered by the institution that lead to a California credential or certificate 22

23. Program Sampling Most programs will do Program Sampling after having completed Program Assessment Some programs will not have done Program Assessment (transitioning or new programs) If many standards have More Information Needed, a full Program Review will take place What documentation will then be needed? 23 HO: Program Sampling or Full Program Review (8)

24. 24 Program Sampling Cluster Complete Program Summary is needed for each program Review team member(s) will be looking across groups of approved programs through the lens of Program Design Course of Study (Curriculum & Fieldwork) Assessment of Candidates HO: Program Review (2)

25. Biennial Report An additional Biennial Report (Year 5) is due before your site visit Be sure to turn it in by your self-selected submission date (August 15, or Sept. 15, 2011). It may be turned in earlier. Staff will return the feedback as quickly as possible – site visits have priority Biennial Report Part B—provide evidence for Common Standard 2 25

26. Biennial Report—Part B Part B of the Biennial Report requires the unit head to reflect upon the program specific data— for Common Standard 2 consider Aggregating data up to the unit Report on unit level analysis of data and decisions to act on the analysis 26

27. 27 Common Standards Narrative Document that addresses the Common Standards Supporting evidence should be available electronically Hot links are great, but also lists of exhibits are helpful HO: Program and Common Standard Review (2)

28. 28 Post a minimum of 60 days prior to visit Include links to supporting documentation Common Standards Narrative Program Documents including Preliminary Report of Findings Program Summaries Biennial Reports and CTC Feedback Please ensure these items are on a flash drive, delivered to the team members 1 month in advance, if website not being used Site Visit Documentation (5)

29. 29 Team Composition Size and structure of the team is negotiated between the institution and the Commission Team Lead(1) Common Standards Cluster (1-2) Program focused team members (1-2) Consultant (1) If necessary, specific program focused team members

30. 30 Sample Interview Schedule Common Standards Program Sampling Program specific issues, if needed See Accreditation Handbook: Appendix B

31. 31Interviews Focus on Institutional and Unit support for all programs Who can answer or demonstrate how the programs are supported by the larger unit and institution? Resources, Leadership, Quality Faculty/Instructional Personnel, etc. CTC Common Standards Approved Programs Organized into clusters Preliminary Teaching Programs Special Education Programs Advanced Teaching Programs Services Programs Talk with your State Consultant

32. Focus of the Interviews Common Standards—interview across the education unit focusing on concepts in the Common Standards Programs—interview one stakeholder constituency at a time within the assigned cluster of programs The Schedule: Columns—for Each Reviewer: Program cluster and Common Standard cluster Rows—time of day, room, constituency 32

33. Schedule Essentials Program Sampling team members need 1 ½ hours on the first morning with the Program Coordinators, organized by Program Cluster 1 ½ hours for lunch each day for the team to eat and have a team meeting Provide 10-15 minutes between interviews Each team member needs a minimum of 1 hour per day not to be in a scheduled interview Mid-Visit Report needs to be on the schedule (First thing, Tuesday/Day 2 a.m.)—formal meeting with unit head on the progress and what is still needed 33

34. 34 Planning for the Team Visit Interview Schedule includes Candidates Graduates Master teachers/Supervisors Employers/Administrators Administration and Faculty of the Institution Collaborative partners in governance (advisory) Off Campus/Satellite visits Credential Programs outside the School/Department of Education

35. Two Month Out Pre-Visit On-site visit to your institution by State Consultant Team Lead Purpose: Finalize all logistics including interview schedule 35

36. Site Visit Sunday noon through Wednesday noon or Monday noon through Thursday noon Sunday Interviews for constituencies not available on other days Day 2 morning through Day 3 morning/early afternoon, i.e. employers, advisory board, completers, district-employed supervisors. Day 3 morning, Mid-Visit Report Leave campus Day 3 with all data and interviews completed Plan for Exit Report around 1:00 pm on Day 4 36

37. Team Report Team makes decisions on all standards— Common and Program Team makes a recommendation on the accreditation status COA hears the report within 1-2 months COA makes an Accreditation Decision 37

38. Accreditation Team Report Each Common Standard Addressed Separately Each Credential Program Area Addressed Program Design; Course of Study (Curriculum/Fieldwork) Candidate Assessment 38

39. 39 Accreditation Team Report Team makes DECISIONS about all standards: Common and Program Common and Program Standard Findings Standard Met Standard Met with Concerns Standard Not Met

40. 40 Accreditation Team Report Team makes an Accreditation Recommendation to the COA on the unit and all of its approved programs Accreditation Accreditation with Stipulations Accreditation with Major Stipulations Accreditation with Probationary Stipulations

41. 41 Presentation to COA Consultant - Introduces Report Team Leader - Presents Report Institutional Representative - Responds to Report Committee Discussion Committee on Accreditation Decision Appeals Available on the process

42. 42 Accreditation Decision Committee on Accreditation accepts and reviews the team report Committee on Accreditation makes the Accreditation Decision Accreditation Accreditation with Stipulations (Stipulations, Major Stipulations, Probationary Stipulations)

43. 43 After the Site Visit Accreditation Decision by COA Report due next year addressing any and all Stipulations Concerns Questions Continue in the accreditation cycle, completing the activities of the Red Cohort – See Cohort Map Cohort Map (10)

44. Consultant Monthly contact video conference Skype phone calls emails ask any question! Webinar software—if you need a presentation to advisory board or others 44

45. CTC Webcasts http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/webcasts.html Accreditation 101 Common Standard 2 Unit and Program Evaluation System 45

46. 46 Additional Information www.ctc.ca.gov (Program Sponsors) www.ctc.ca.gov Site Visit Web page: http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator- prep/program-accred-site-visits.htmlhttp://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator- prep/program-accred-site-visits.html Accreditation Framework Accreditation Handbook http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/accred-handbook.html http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/accred-handbook.html Cheryl Hickey, Administrator of Accreditation Assigned State Consultant