Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Severe Myocarditis: A 2012 update…

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Severe Myocarditis: A 2012 update…"— Presentation transcript:

1 Severe Myocarditis: A 2012 update…
Alain Combes Service de Réanimation iCAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6

2 Definition - Etiologies
«Myocarditis» is defined as inflammation of the heart muscle Histology: cellular infiltrate and myocyte necrosis Etiologies: Infectious diseases Viruses: Coxsackie, Adenovirus, HIV, Parvovirus B19, HHV6, (H1N1) Bacteria Parasites (Toxoplasma, Chagas) Fungi Hypersensitivity (Drugs) Autoimmune and systemic diseases Lupus, Wegener, Eosinophilic, Sarcoidosis, Giant cell Myocardial toxins (Cocaine, chemotherapy) Peripartum

3 6.3 millions military recruits over 25 yrs
126 non-traumatic sudden deaths, autopsy performed 10% of myocarditis-related deaths

4 Clinical manifestations
From asymptomatic EKG abnormalities to overt cardiac failure… Clinical features: Preceding viral illness, flu-like syndrome Fever Chest pain, mimicking acute coronary syndromes Tachycardia Arrhythmia Sudden death: 10% of cases (Eckart, AnnIntMed, O4) Clinical signs of heart failure Minimal, slow evolution Fulminant, leading to refractory cardiogenic shock in a few days

5 EKG EKG findings May be normal… Sinus tachycardia
Diffuse ST-T wave abnormalities Prolonged QT interval Bundle branch block (LBBB++) Myocardial infarction pattern Complete heart block Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias Ventricular tachyarrhythmias May be normal…

6 EKG mimicking AMI

7 EKG: LBBB

8 Laboratory Findings

9 Biology: Troponin (Smith, Circ, 97)

10 Many patients with acute/fulminant myocarditis will undergo coronary artery angiography…

11 Other laboratory findings
Non specific tests Leucocytosis/leucopenia, Eosinophilia+++ Mononucleosic syndrome Sedimentation rate, CRP, PCT… Specialized tests Virological diagnosis Serology (limited value) Cultures: throat and stools PCR (blood, CSF, tissues) Inflammation: Antinuclear Ab, ANCA, Angiotensin Conversion Enzyme Research tests Autoantibodies (mitochondria, myosin, b-receptor) Immunohistochemical myocardial studies (research)

12 Doppler Echocardiography

13 Fulminant myocarditis
Markedly decreased LV EF Near normal LV dimension Increased septal thickness Acute myocarditis Dilated LV Normal septal thickness

14 Doppler Echocardiography
Other findings Regional wall motion abnormalities Diastolic dysfunction Change in echocardiographic image texture: Increased brightness Heterogeneity Thrombi Pericardial effusion

15 The new diagnostic gold standard?
Cardiac MRI… The new diagnostic gold standard?

16 Cardiac MRI Combination of T1-weighted and T2-weighted
Gadolinium contrast-enhanced MRI +++ Visualize localization, activity and extent of inflammation One or several foci in the myocardium Foci most frequently located in lateral free wall Frequent subepicardial lesions Can guide myocardial biopsies+++

17

18 Still indication for myocardial biopsies?

19 Histology: Dallas Criteria
3 histological grades (Aretz, Hum Pathol, 87) Active Myocarditis : Cellular infiltrate +, myocyte necrosis + Borderline Myocarditis : Cellular infiltrate +, myocyte necrosis - Negative Biopsy : Cellular infiltrate -, myocyte necrosis - Distribution and diffusion of the cellular infiltrate Focal, confluent or diffuse Mild, moderate, severe However, low to moderate sensitivity/specificity

20 Histology: Dallas Criteria
Borderline Active

21

22

23 Grade 1, Level B: .

24 Prognosis

25 Prognosis McCarthy, NEJM, 2000 Survie sans transplantation P=0.05
(15 patients) P=0.05 (132 patients)

26

27

28 41 patients refractory cardiogenic shock due to fulminant myocarditis
41 patients refractory cardiogenic shock due to fulminant myocarditis Mean age 38±12 years 66%, women Mechanical assistance Thoratec BiVAD (n=6) or ECMO (n=35)

29

30 4 (10%) patients had heart transplantation
Long term survival: 68% 4 (10%) patients had heart transplantation Independent predictors of ICU death determined at admission: SAPS II >56 (OR, 10.23) and troponin Ic >12 microg/L (OR, 7.49)

31 Complete follow-up for 26 survivors
Median follow-up was 525 [92–2400] days Mean LVEF was 57±9% ≥60% for 12 non-transplant and all 4 transplanted 40–60% for 10 nontransplanted survivors 21 patients had percutaneous femoral ECMO 10 still complained of paresthesia/peripheral neurological defect 2 had persistent leg ischemia requiring surgical repair for 1 and amputation for the other

32

33

34

35

36 Treatment

37 Treatment Supportive care always indicated Mechanical assistance +++
Bed rest Diuretics, vasodilators ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers Aldosterone antagonists b-blockers, (with caution in the acute phase) Vasopressors/inotropic agents in case of shock Mechanical assistance +++ May be urgently needed if fulminant form or rapid deterioration of hemodynamic status Patients should rapidly be transferred to experienced centers Bridge to recovery: ECMO+++, First line assistance (Heart transplantation)

38 ECMO vs. BiVAD for fulminant myocarditis?

39 P = ns

40

41 T bilirubin mol/dl Creatinine mol/dl

42

43 Long term survival: 68%, 4 (10%) patients had heart transplantation
Independent predictors of ICU death determined at admission: SAPS II >56 (OR, 10.23) and troponin Ic >12 g/L (OR, 7.49)

44 Specific/Novel treatments
Immunosuppression First line therapy if Giant cell Systemic autoimmune diseases Corticosteroids Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus Azathioprine Immunomodulation/Stimulation IV Immune globulins Interferon Antiviral agents, vaccination

45 Myocarditis Treatment Trial
111 randomized patients, LVEF<45% Histologically proven myocarditis Immunosuppression protocol Placebo vs prednisone + Cyclosporine or azathioprine Mason, NEJM, 1995

46 IV immune globulin 62 patients with DCM, randomized, LVEF<40%
McNamara, Circ, 2001 62 patients with DCM, randomized, LVEF<40% Placebo vs IVIg P = NS

47 Tailored immune-modulating strategies
Liu, Circ, 2001 Phase I Phase II Phase III

48 Immunomodulation vs Immunosuppression
Interféron b chez les patients avec persistance virale entero-adénovirus Kuhl, Circ, 2003 22 patients, Dysfonction VG, génome viral + Interféron: Clearance virus, amélioration FE Immunosuppression:prednisone+imurel Frustaci, Circ, 03 41 patients, myocardite active, Dysfonction VG 21 répondeurs, 20 non rep Répondeurs: AutoAC +, génome viral- (sauf Hep C) Wojnicz, Circ 01 84 patients CMD, HLA surexprimé sur myocytes Traitement de 3 mois Amélioration dans groupe traité: 71% vs 31%

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56 Conclusion Myocarditis is a rare and severe condition
Especially the fulminant form Diagnosis based on clinical features, EKG, Echo, Troponin, MRI Myocarditis can mimic acute coronary syndromes Mechanical circulatory assistance may be urgently needed if rapid hemodynamic deterioration Immunosuppression during the acute phase Giant cell Systemic autoimmune diseases Significant progresses in the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease in recent years Help design tailored immune-modulating strategies

57 La Pitié: Louis XIV, 1656… To 2012…
La Chapelle Institut de Cardiologie


Download ppt "Severe Myocarditis: A 2012 update…"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google