1. IR-4 Headquarters Update Van Starner – Assistant Director, Research Planning (w/Jerry Baron & Dan Kunkel) (IR-4 Western Region 2013 SLR/CLC Meeting - 3/26-27/2013, Santa Cruz, CA)

2. HQ Update Outline

3. 2012/2013 Deliverables Food Crop Program – YES/Annual Report (http://ir4.rutgers.edu/)http://ir4.rutgers.edu/ Facilitating Registrations - 2012 266 new tolerances 1087 new clearances (= potential new use registrations; 60% on commercial labels by early Jan. 2013) Submissions to EPA/Mfg will address ~160 PCRs (supporting registrations on 31 chemicals) 80 new residue studies Facilitating Registrations – 2013 (thru early March) ~50 new clearances approved (6 new tolerances) ~360 clearances/70 tolerances in NOFs <70 new residue studies (~500 US trials + ~50 in CN)

4. 2012/2013 Deliverables Food Crop Program Crop Grouping Tree nut/Stone fruit group revisions approved 8/2012 (total revised + new = 9) Crop group 1 (root/tuber veggies) revision proposal submitted to EPA 10/2012 Crop group 2 (leaves of root/tuber veggies) revision proposal submitted to EPA 3/2013 HED analysis completed 3/2013 for Crop groups 23/24 (tropical fruits edible/inedible peel) Crop group 6 (legumes) - revision prepared/being debated

5. 2012 Deliverables Food Crop Program International Global Minor Use Summit II - Feb. 2012 Completed/submitted 2 nd global residue study – blueberry (part of first ever submission by Bayer for BYI-02960 [flupyradifurone]) Codex MRL’s (submitted 73 data packages for 6 AI’s – to help reduce residues as trade barriers) Capacity building (SE Asia, Central/South America, Africa) – getting other countries involved in global studies

6. BYI 02960 Blueberry Global Residue Project LOWBUSH Blueberry: –3 trials in Nova Scotia (one decline) –1 trial in Maine HIGHBUSH Blueberry: –2 trials in New Jersey –3 trials in Michigan (one decline) –2 trials in North Carolina –1 trial in Oregon –1 trial in Quebec European trials –1 trial in Spain - decline –1 trial in Denmark –2 trials in the U.K. – decline –1 trial in Italy - decline –Note:2 trials using “protected” crop. Other sites (HIGHBUSH) –3 trials in Australia –2 trials in New Zealand –3 trials in Chile (one decline)  Study conducted under one protocol (one GAP), IR-4 was the Sponsor and Study Director (K. Dorschner)  All samples were shipped to/analyzed by Bayer Crop Science Laboratory ____________________________________________________________________ 26 total field sites in 9 countries

7. enGLOBAL RESIDUE STUDY GLOBAL RESIDUE STUDY-Blueberry

8. Analysis Using the OECD MRL Calculator NAFTA sites only 13 field trials Lowest residue 0.290 ppm Highest residue 2.59 ppm Median residue 0.834 ppm Mean residue 0.912 ppm SD 0.630 Unrounded MRL3.431 ppm Rounded MRL4 ppm Global data (all sites) 26 field trials Lowest residue 0.193 ppm Highest residue 2.59 ppm Median residue 0.867 ppm Mean residue 0.974 ppm SD 0.632 Unrounded MRL3.504 ppm Rounded MRL4 ppm

9. 2012 Deliverables Biopesticide and Organic Support Program Funded 19 grant proposals (7 early, 7 advanced, 5 demonstration) 12 additions of crops to biopesticide labels (via reg. assistance and data submission) Supported 26 bird repellency Sec. 18’s Avipel liquid for corn (10 states) Avipel dry for corn (13 states) AV-1011 for rice (FL, LA) Avipel liquid for sunflower (SD)

10. 2012 Deliverables Ornamental Horticulture Program - IR-4 data supported 7 registrations/label amendments which expanded the use of pesticides on 644 species of non-food crops - 21 data summaries were written/submitted to registrants to expand future uses - $900K APHIS grant for invasive species research

11. 2012 Deliverables Public Health Pesticides Published a unique inventory of over 600 current/potential public health pesticides (includes regulatory status around the globe and efficacy in a range of uses) Continued efforts to secure from EPA removal of “drift to cropland” restriction on etofenprox mosquito adulticide label Initiated major review of volatile insect repellents/toxicants – to assist military, WHO, CDC, etc., in selection of area-wide vector control agents Working to ensure new data requirements don’t create major gaps in PHP toolbox

12. IR-4 Funding - 2012 Direct Contributions ~$19 million USDA-NIFA$11,916,000 USDA-ARS$ 3,850,000 USDA-ARS/DoD$ 250,000 USDA-FAS (TASC Grant)$ 500,000 World Bank Funds$ ?? USDA-APHIS$ 900,000 State Ag. Exp. Stations$ 481,182 Donations from Industry$ 1,100,000 Indirect Contributions Valued at ~$19 million (1:1 with direct funding)

13. IR-4 Funding Future Administration’s Proposal –Consolidated Crop Protection Program - IR-4 w/IPM Stakeholder Response – Save IR-4 (http://www.saveir-4.org/)http://www.saveir-4.org/ –Maintain a dedicated IR-4 Project with dedicated funding at “functionally equivalent” levels Congress Response –Senate and House rejected USDA’s proposal for 2013; 2014? Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy (NIFA Director) - comments at IR-4 PMC/CLC mtg 3/12/13

14. Staffing Changes at HQ Study Directors –T. Switek moved on; C. Jolly on-board Plant Pathology –D. Thompson left early February (hole in pathology expertise) Quality Assurance –D. D’Angelo started mid-February –K. Hackett-Fields & B. Patel both to retire by May 1 –New NE QA to be partially coordinated thru HQ –eQA launch – May? Rutgers significant fringe increase – impact?

15. FUW - 2013 The 2013 FUW: September 17-18: Sheraton Albuquerque Uptown, 2600 Louisiana Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM (http://www.sheratonalbuquerqueuptown.com/albuquerq ue-nm-hotel)http://www.sheratonalbuquerqueuptown.com/albuquerq ue-nm-hotel Info on website: (http://ir4.rutgers.edu/FoodUse/FUWorkshop/index.html)http://ir4.rutgers.edu/FoodUse/FUWorkshop/index.html For 2014 FUW: east coast (Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Portsmouth????)

16. Plans/deadlines for 2013 FUW Aug. 12 – EPA red/yellow/green light project assessment complete Aug. 14 – last day for receipt of new PCRs, for consideration at FUW Aug. 16-Sept. 4 – project nominations on the IR-4 website (organized by discipline) Sept. 9 – project reports/spreadsheets for workshop available on IR-4 website

17. “A” Priority Criteria Criteria for a project gaining an “A” priority: - Availability and efficacy of alternative pest management tools (including ongoing projects for the same need) - Pest damage potential of target pest(s) - Performance and crop safety of the chemical tool in managing the target pest(s) - Compatibility of the proposed chemical candidate with Integrated Pest Management - Uses currently covered by Section 18 emergency exemptions - Harmonization implications due to lack of Int’l MRLs - Capacity of IR-4 research resources

18. FUW to NRPM Schedule Aug. 15-Oct. 10 – PUPs accepted for new PCRs Oct. 1 – 2014 tentative project list available for on-line field/lab site entries Oct. 10 – deadline for proposed upgrades/PUPs Oct. 15 – HQ/RFC conf. call to confirm carryover trials & upgraded additional priorities (regional and PUPs) for 2014 research plan Oct. 28 – deadline for field/lab site assignments Nov. 5-6 – NRPM at U.C. Davis

19. Public Interest Finding March 21, 2013 In This Update: EPA Criteria for IR-4 Public Interest Finding Now Available on the Web The EPA has posted the criteria that it will use in determining when a pesticide registration application will be exempt from paying the registration service fee under the Pesticide Registration Improvement Extension Act (PRIA 3). Under PRIA 3, pesticide registration applications that are solely associated with a tolerance petition submitted in connection with the Interregional Research Project No. 4 and is in the public interest is exempt from registration service fees.PRIA 3 Factors for IR-4 Public Interest Findings are available at: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees/questions/factors-for-public-interest- finding.pdf. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/fees/questions/factors-for-public-interest- finding.pdf

20. COMMODIT Y PRODUCER S FOOD PROCESSORS CONSUMERS ANNIVERSARY-2013 5 th

21. Economic Impact of IR-4 The Michigan State University Center for Economic Analysis (Dec. 2011) report For a combined total budget of ~$18 million, the IR-4 Project contributes –over $7.2 billion to annual US Gross Domestic Product –support 104,650 jobs throughout the United States.