Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SupportSat CDR2 April, 2004 SupportSat Critical Design Review University of Colorado Boulder 2 April, 2004 Project Managers: John Chouinard Brian Taylor.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SupportSat CDR2 April, 2004 SupportSat Critical Design Review University of Colorado Boulder 2 April, 2004 Project Managers: John Chouinard Brian Taylor."— Presentation transcript:

1 SupportSat CDR2 April, 2004 SupportSat Critical Design Review University of Colorado Boulder 2 April, 2004 Project Managers: John Chouinard Brian Taylor

2 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission Description Gather magnetometer interference data Test intelligent pixel matching operations

3 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission Goals and NASA Benefits Show effect of flight equipment on magnetometer readings Demonstrate intelligent pixel matching algorithm –Scale and make images linear –Find ground features –Match pixels between subsequent pictures Steps for stereoscopic imaging

4 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 System Requirements Testing equipment to be used on DINO spacecraft –Mission: determine cloud heights from space All sub-systems using DINO equipment except for power and thermal Power and thermal –Must remain powered throughout flight and above 0 o C –Components should be light weight

5 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 System Overview and Interfaces

6 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Project Organization

7 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Attitude and Determination Control Systems Team Lead: Lisa Hewitt

8 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To use gyroscopes to determine attitude of SupportSat aiding intelligent imaging operations To test DINO’s magnetometers, gyroscopes, and their respective interfaces

9 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Honeywell HMC 2003 Magnetic Hybrid The magnetometers were selected in order to test the equipment that DINO will be flying The magnetometers will test interface data to be analyzed for use by DINO Interface Requirements: Three channel analog to digital converter per magnetometer

10 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Analog Devices ADXRS150 The gyroscopes were chosen because DINO will be using them The gyroscopes will take frequent samples of the positioning of the satellite to maintain and monitor camera position Interface Requirements: One channel analog to digital converter per gyroscope

11 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Analog to Digital Converters Multiplexer: ADG426 - 16 channels -Low power -Low resistance Will sample data from each device then relay data through one output to converter A/D Converter Max164 -12 bit -CMOS Will take analog input data from multiplexer and convert to digital data to be sent to the flight computer

12 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Order parts Test interfaces once parts are received Test equipment under wind simulations comparable to flight conditions

13 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Run equipment under similar flight circumstances to ensure proper operation and interface

14 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Possible software incompatibility of the converters with the flight computer

15 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Magnetometers Gyroscopes A/D converter Multiplexer $398 $99 Free (Samples) <200g < 1.5 g ~ 2g ~5g 12V @ 20mA 5V @ 6mA 12V @ 20 mA -40C to 85C

16 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Science Team Team Lead: William Willcockson

17 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission Prepare Canon Digital Rebel camera for flight Develop image analysis algorithm to be used in-flight

18 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Canon Digital Rebel Identical to the cameras to be flown on DINO Terrain features in preview shots will trigger hi-res shots USB for picture downloads, digital I/O for camera configuration

19 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Sub-System Interfaces Digital I/O inputs from the flight controller to receive configuration commands USB for image capture commands and image uploading

20 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Camera must be hooked up to its digital I/O lines Camera must be integrated into the balloon-sat

21 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Image analysis algorithm will undergo ground testing Camera will be tested to confirm its operational readiness within the balloon- sat

22 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Digital I/O lines will need to be routed through the camera body

23 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Canon Digital Rebel <$800 with lens 690 gTBD 0° - 40°C Micro controller <$20<20 g<1 mW -20° - 40°C

24 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Command and Data Handling / Software Team Lead: Joe Wang

25 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To coordinate data handling and satellite operations Requirements: –Collect data from magnetometer, gyros and camera –Create software for subsystems –Create pixel matching software –Interface flight computer (Arcom VIPER) with peripheral devices

26 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Computer: VIPER

27 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Reasons this component was initially chosen: –Low power consumption of 1.6 W –Has most number of serial ports (5) as compared with other boards plus 2 USB –Has 8 general purpose I/O pins with expansion possibilities –Meets all interface and design requirements –Good processing speed of 400MHz –Allows for Compact Flash The flight computer will function as a central control unit, compiling data and running algorithms Flight Computer: VIPER

28 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Compact Flash Card (1 GB)

29 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Compact flash memory format is compatible with both the VIPER board and digital camera Provides inexpensive storage for large amounts of data, which will be necessary to hold the digital pictures taken in-flight Compact Flash Card (1 GB)

30 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Sub-System Interfaces The following devices are inputs to the flight computer: –Magnetometer –Gyros –Digital Camera –5 volt power supply

31 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Complete software for data transfers from peripheral devices Debug Software Obtain components and wire to the peripheral devices Test hardware and software once successfully implementation

32 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Hardware Testing –Automated scripts will test all functions of all subsystems in a logical and safe manner Low-level Code Testing –Language Unit Test Framework –Automatically tests code to make sure it performs as expected Document all code thoroughly as it is written

33 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns The proficient completion of all necessary software

34 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal VIPER$475.0096 g1.6 W (320 mA @ 5 V) -20° C to +70° C 1.0 GB CF Card (2) $244.9910 gIncluded with VIPER’s power supply 0° C to +70° C

35 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Power / Thermal Team Lead: Paul Roberts

36 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To ensure that all subsystems retain power and temperature requirements throughout the duration of the flight.

37 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Kokam 3.7V Lithium Polymer and Charger Why battery was chosen: –Extremely light weight –Small dimensions –Acceptable cost Provides power to the satellite

38 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Space Blanket Why this was chosen: –Extremely light weight –Inexpensive –80% heat retention Provides insulation for satellite

39 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Ceramic Resistors Why this was chosen: –Extremely light weight –Inexpensive –Ceramic resistors used in the past Provides heat and correct power requirements

40 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Timer Circuit Why this was chosen: –Small –Relatively Inexpensive –Multiple timing periods –Adjusts from one minute to two hours Ensures hinge deployment time

41 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Schematic

42 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Obtain parts Cold tests Interface, wire and solder

43 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Cold Tests –Resistors –Insulation Power –Timer circuit –Energy dissipated by resistors –Correct voltage requirements

44 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Heat from resistors Battery life due to resistors Voltage regulator for hinge deployment

45 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Battery(8)$ 18.2034.02 g3.7V (out)-40° c to 85° c Charger (2)$ 99.90N/A Blanket$ 3.9585 g (max)N/A Timer Circuit$ 16.958 g12VDC 200mA -40° c to 85° c Wiring≈ $ 1/ft≈.1 gN/A Resistors (6)$.50≈ 1 gN/A-40° c min

46 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Structure and Mechanisms Team Lead: Andrew Young

47 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To supply a sturdy structure that will aid in the success of the mission To keep components safe from the elements for reuse To deploy a magnetometer attached to a CTD hinge

48 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 CTD Hinge Chosen for ability to deploy components Mission will be complete upon deployment of the magnetometer Requires 10W at 28V for 3 minutes

49 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Satellite Structure Cube was selected for is stability and efficient use of space The mission will be accomplished if all of the parts can be reused on later missions. The structure must be capable of holding all of the components

50 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Satellite Structure

51 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Sub-System Interfaces The CTD hinge requires 28V of power from the batteries. The satellite is required to hold all of the Sub-Systems inside the structure. –ADCS, Science, Power/Thermal The CTD hinge must be mounted on the outside

52 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness The CTD hinge will be bent to the appropriate angle The structure will be closed up and sealed All of the components will be turned on The structure will be attached to the balloon

53 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Impact testing- terminal velocity Thermal testing- temperature difference Stair pitched test- dropped down the stairs Whip test- circular motion with an abrupt change The CTD hinge will be deployed and bent multiple times

54 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Having the most efficient use of space The mounting of the camera The attachment of the satellite to the balloon The mount for the CTD hinge –Gives to much or not enough

55 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 CTD Hinge Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal CTD Hinge FREE21 grams10W at 28V for 3 minutes Space Blanket

56 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Aluminum$5085gn/a Foam Core $10125gn/a

57 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Total Mass/Cost Budget TeamMass (grams)Cost ADCS208.5497 Science710820 C&DH/Software116965 Power/Thermal373370 Structure21060 Mechanism21None Total1638.52712

58 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Project Schedule

59 SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Questions?


Download ppt "SupportSat CDR2 April, 2004 SupportSat Critical Design Review University of Colorado Boulder 2 April, 2004 Project Managers: John Chouinard Brian Taylor."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google