Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilfred Norris Modified over 9 years ago
1
Kamran Shamaei Prof. Gregory S. Sawicki Prof. Aaron M. Dollar
Subject-Specific Predictive Models of Lower-limb Joint Quasi-Stiffness and Applications in Exoskeleton Design Kamran Shamaei Prof. Gregory S. Sawicki Prof. Aaron M. Dollar
2
Scope and Application: Prostheses and Orthoses
C-Leg from Ottobock Underactuated Exosksleton from MIT (fig. from scientificamerican.com) HULC from UC Berkeley Compliant SC Orthosis from Yale Ankle-Foot Prosthesis from U. Michigan (fig. from PLoS One) Ankle-Foot Prosthesis from MIT (fig. from MIT news)
3
Challenge: How to size the components of these devices for a specific
user size and gait speed?
4
a randomized sample population
Common Approach: Use average values for joint stiffnesses obtained from gait lab data for a randomized sample population
5
Drawbacks Sample population body stature is not necessarily representative of the user’s Costly and time-consuming Design centers usually do not have a gait lab
6
Drawbacks Sample population body stature is not necessarily representative of the user’s Costly and time-consuming Design centers usually do not have a gait lab
7
Drawbacks Sample population body stature is not necessarily representative of the user’s Costly and time-consuming Design centers usually do not have a gait lab
8
Alternative Framework
9
Design Example: A Quasi-Passive Knee Exoskeleton
Shamaei K, Napolitano P., and Dollar A. (2013) A Quasi-Passive Compliant Stance Control Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis, ICORR, Seattle, Washington, USA.
10
Linear Moment-Angle Behavior of
the Knee in Stance Design: Compliantly support the knee by an exoskeletal spring Shamaei et al., PLoS One 2013a Shamaei et al., ICORR 2011
11
Yale Quasi-Passive Stance Control Orthosis
Shamaei K, Napolitano P., and Dollar A. (2013) A Quasi-Passive Compliant Stance Control Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis, ICORR, Seattle, Washington, USA.
12
Challenge: How to size the spring for a specific user and gait speed?
K (Nm/rad)~ [80 , 800] Shamaei et al. (2013) PLoS One Challenge: How to size the spring for a specific user and gait speed?
13
Linear Moment-Angle Behavior of the Knee in Stance, a Closer Look
K is: User-specific Gait-specific (Shamaei, ICORR 2011) K Tune the stiffness of the device according to the body size and gait speed Ke Kf
14
measurable parameters
Framework : Mathematical/Statistical models that estimate knee quasi-stiffnesses using a set of measurable parameters Gait Speed Weight Height Joint Excursion Kf Ke K
15
Start with Inverse Dynamics Analysis
MKnee MAnkle ,FAnkle GRF, GRM
16
Linking to Gait and Body Parameters
MKnee MKnee~ f(W,V,H) Ke MKnee~ Kiθi Kf Ki ~ f(WVH/θi -WV/θi - WH/θi - W/θi - 1/θi - WVH- WH)
17
Statistical Analysis Regression on Experimental Data
Ki ~ f(WVH/θi, WV/θi, WH/θi, W/θi, 1/θi, WVH, WH) Regression on Experimental Data
18
Springy Behavior at the Optimal Gait Speed
Support the knee using a spring
19
Adjust the Stiffness at Higher Gait Speeds
Assist the knee using a combination of a spring and an active component
20
Comparison with Models that Use Average Values
From: Shamaei K, Sawicki G, and Dollar A. (2013) Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Knee in the Stance Phase of Walking, PLOS ONE.
21
Moment-Angle Performance of Hip
From: Shamaei K, Sawicki G, and Dollar A. Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Hip in the Stance Phase of Walking, in review.
22
Moment-Angle Performance of Ankle
From: Shamaei K, Sawicki G, and Dollar A. (2013) Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness and Propulsive Work of the Human Ankle in the Stance Phase of Walking, PLOS ONE.
23
Similar Approach for Hip and Ankle
MHip Quasi-Stiffness Mknee , FKnee MAnkle ,FAnkle Quasi-Stiffness Work GRF, GRM
24
Models for Ankle Quasi-Stiffness and Work
From: Shamaei K, Sawicki G, and Dollar A. (2013) Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness and Propulsive Work of the Human Ankle in the Stance Phase of Walking, PLOS ONE.
25
Models for Hip Quasi-Stiffness
From: Shamaei K, Sawicki G, and Dollar A. Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Hip in the Stance Phase of Walking, in review.
26
Conclusions Models accurately predict the stiffnesses compared with average values Utilize these equations in design of exoskeletons and prostheses Ideally adjust the stiffness of the device according to the gait speed
27
Conclusions Models accurately predict the stiffnesses compared with average values Utilize these equations in design of exoskeletons and prostheses Ideally adjust the stiffness of the device according to the gait speed
28
Conclusions Models accurately predict the stiffnesses compared with average values Utilize these equations in design of exoskeletons and prostheses Ideally adjust the stiffness of the device according to the gait speed
29
Thanks for Your Attention
Experimental data: 26 subjects 216 gait cycles Gait speed (m/s): [0.75 , 2.63] Height (m): [1.45 , 1.86] Weight (kg): [57.7 , 94.0] Data granted by: Prof. DeVita, Prof. Sawicki, and Prof. Frigo Funding: US Defense Medical Research and Development Program, grant #W81XWH
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.